You forgot draft dodger.japhy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 2:31 pm Convicted rapist, anti-constitutionalist, former tv show host Donald trump who talks a lot to the people around him about his thoughts on fucking his own daughter is now in DC federal courthouse for arraignment on charges that he conspired to illegally overturn the election and will of the US people.
People were seen on the streets "flipping off" the convicted rapist as he made his way through the city.
Charges
Re: Charges
Defense. Rebounds.
Re: Charges
Witch hunt! Can't believe you rubes are falling for this $*!*
Re: Charges
Nero is an angler in the lake of darkness
Re: Charges
These are just some of the MAGA sycophants who tried to discredit the January 6th committee. They are still in office. The threat still remains.
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Derek Cressman
Re: Charges
Can anyone assure me that Randy isn't Trump's sock?
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Derek Cressman
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13858
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Charges
i’ve come to the opinion that this is a necessary and inevitable processtwocoach wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 7:54 am https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/03/media/ri ... index.html
This is the new normal.
it was bound to happen at some point
be can only hope that we come out of it a stronger democracy, and not a pseudo-autocracy
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Charges
I have concluded that there is no longer a meaningful portion of people who can be persuaded. If you’re not out on The Defendant by now, you are hooked for life. There is nothing you can’t or won’t find a way to justify or excuse or give a pass.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13858
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Charges
there’s at least two of them here
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13858
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Charges
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Charges
Agreed. Trump is not being charged for disputing the results of the election. But we've already seen our resident MAGA parrots share via repost here that same angle of stupidity as soon as it flowed through their social media accounts.KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 9:32 am i’m starting to like Kinzinger more and more
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... rbage/amp/
Re: Charges
This arrogance and stupidity led The Defendant’s lead DC lawyer to go on the teevee last night and admit to a key portion of the government’s allegations. And there is established legal precedent in this context that the lawyer’s statement can be attributed to The Defendant. And the only real way to rebut that…would be for The Defendant to give testimony.twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 9:42 amAgreed. Trump is not being charged for disputing the results of the election. But we've already seen our resident MAGA parrots share via repost here that same angle of stupidity as soon as it flowed through their social media accounts.KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 9:32 am i’m starting to like Kinzinger more and more
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... rbage/amp/
Re: Charges
I'm starting a bottomless pit of popcorn.
Re: Charges
It is becoming apparent that The Defendant’s plan is:
1 - win in 2024 so as to unlock pardon power, or
2 - get the bought-and-paid-for Court to declare the Electoral Count Act to be unconstitutionally vague (to the point of unenforceability)
The problems with 1 are obvious. The main problem with 2 is that the Court is equally as craven as The Defendant, but universes smarter and savvier.
1 - win in 2024 so as to unlock pardon power, or
2 - get the bought-and-paid-for Court to declare the Electoral Count Act to be unconstitutionally vague (to the point of unenforceability)
The problems with 1 are obvious. The main problem with 2 is that the Court is equally as craven as The Defendant, but universes smarter and savvier.
Re: Charges
Didn’t he pretty much try 2 already?
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13858
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Charges
78
that’s the total number of individual charges…so far
(one more than trump’s age lol)
that’s the total number of individual charges…so far
(one more than trump’s age lol)
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?