The link he shared simply said that he was a funder, which is accurate. If you drew some sort of meaning out of it that it was implying that he was the primary funder or a major funder then that's on you for once again failing at reading comprehension. You should stop trying to read into things and just take the words for what they say because your ability to read between the lines and find some deeper inferred meaning is terrible.randylahey wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:30 pm Jfish is the dumbass. He begged me in a separate thread to look at his post about Fabian marta. And his info wasn't even accurate. Lol. Dumbass
Child sex trafficking
Re: Child sex trafficking
- randylahey
- Posts: 8981
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: Child sex trafficking
It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news
Re: Child sex trafficking
Felony kidnapping is no big deal to them.twocoach wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 11:05 amThe link he shared simply said that he was a funder, which is accurate. If you drew some sort of meaning out of it that it was implying that he was the primary funder or a major funder then that's on you for once again failing at reading comprehension. You should stop trying to read into things and just take the words for what they say because your ability to read between the lines and find some deeper inferred meaning is terrible.randylahey wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:30 pm Jfish is the dumbass. He begged me in a separate thread to look at his post about Fabian marta. And his info wasn't even accurate. Lol. Dumbass
Re: Child sex trafficking
A felony kidnapping case, whether related to child custody or not, is not a non story if you care about children like you claim.randylahey wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:55 pm It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news
Re: Child sex trafficking
But they don't care. See Trump's family "separation"
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12526
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: Child sex trafficking
Thanks fish and 2coach! I was thinking similar thoughts and admit I was sort of baiting randy.
I felt to a LESSER extent fish MAYBE did something randy often does and randy the "dumbass" (his word - not mine) was too stupid to realize calling out fish for it makes him an even bigger hypocrite.
Then randy went on to say - "It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news".
Which of course proves randy is a bigger "dumbass" (his word - not mine) than he was before he made that post.
Thanks to defix, 2coach, and Sparko for helping point that out.
I felt to a LESSER extent fish MAYBE did something randy often does and randy the "dumbass" (his word - not mine) was too stupid to realize calling out fish for it makes him an even bigger hypocrite.
Then randy went on to say - "It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news".
Which of course proves randy is a bigger "dumbass" (his word - not mine) than he was before he made that post.
Thanks to defix, 2coach, and Sparko for helping point that out.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: Child sex trafficking
We're in this weird social media cycle where pointing anything out is "making a big deal of it" or "being in your head". A Chiefs fan posts something that mentions the Bengals and Bengals fans spazz out about it being proof that the Bengals are all Chiefs fans think about. Someone rightly points out that a person who was a funder of a movie was arrested for a charge and it's "someone making a huge deal of it trying to sabotage the movie". People are so in their social media echo chambers of arguing and ignorance that everything is taken to the nth degree without hesitation. It's exhausting to be honest.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:26 am Thanks fish and 2coach! I was thinking similar thoughts and admit I was sort of baiting randy.
I felt to a LESSER extent fish MAYBE did something randy often does and randy the "dumbass" (his word - not mine) was too stupid to realize calling out fish for it makes him an even bigger hypocrite.
Then randy went on to say - "It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news".
Which of course proves randy is a bigger "dumbass" (his word - not mine) than he was before he made that post.
Thanks to defix, 2coach, and Sparko for helping point that out.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13941
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Child sex trafficking
shocked that our resident child safety advocate hasn’t posted the recent news of the trafficking bust and children being rescued
shocked, i tell you
shocked, i tell you
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Good news rarely draws any attention.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Yep, just another case of "Biden's" FBI that doesn't do anything about child sex trafficking doing something about child sex trafficking.KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 10:02 am shocked that our resident child safety advocate hasn’t posted the recent news of the trafficking bust and children being rescued
shocked, i tell you
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/08/australi ... index.html
Our local Omaha FBI field office played a major part in one of these busts last year. Thank goodness they actually care about busting sex traffickers unlike Randy's version of them.
https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-of ... -operation
Re: Child sex trafficking
Another recent case here in Omaha, this one the sentencing of a former Omaha police officer who was arrested for production and possession of child pornography to 36 years in federal prison.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ne/pr/form ... sion-child
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ne/pr/form ... sion-child
Re: Child sex trafficking
But see there’s this movie.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Good!
(But this doesn't get at the issue you assiduously avoid, which is that (1) whether or not child sex trafficking is bad (it is!) is simply not the same thing as (2) where this movie came from, and why, and from whom, and what the movie is being used for.)
Re: Child sex trafficking
Why is the deep state working in Australia instead of the USA?
- randylahey
- Posts: 8981
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: Child sex trafficking
These are issues you created. My whole point was that it's bad. You're the one trying to argue semantics about a movie that highlights a bad issuejfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:24 pmGood!
(But this doesn't get at the issue you assiduously avoid, which is that (1) whether or not child sex trafficking is bad (it is!) is simply not the same thing as (2) where this movie came from, and why, and from whom, and what the movie is being used for.)
Re: Child sex trafficking
I created nothing. The very first time this stupid movie was mentioned on this board was you complaining about liberals taking a skeptical eye toward the movie.randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:38 pmThese are issues you created. My whole point was that it's bad. You're the one trying to argue semantics about a movie that highlights a bad issuejfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:24 pmGood!
(But this doesn't get at the issue you assiduously avoid, which is that (1) whether or not child sex trafficking is bad (it is!) is simply not the same thing as (2) where this movie came from, and why, and from whom, and what the movie is being used for.)
In fact, the ONLY reason this thread exists is you (later) tried to move the goalposts.
Re: Child sex trafficking
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Child sex trafficking
Yes, that is the case I linked the story to above and that others were referencing.
No one here is doubting that there are various child pedophilia rings operating all over the world. There are no people here or anywhere else claiming otherwise. Good grief. It's the next phase of "logic" that jumps to the conspiracy theory level of stupidity.
Re: Child sex trafficking
More specifically, using the stupid movie as a form of loyalty test; if you DON'T support this stupid movie, that makes you PRO CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING.twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pmYes, that is the case I linked the story to above and that others were referencing.
No one here is doubting that there are various child pedophilia rings operating all over the world. There are no people here or anywhere else claiming otherwise. Good grief. It's the next phase of "logic" that jumps to the conspiracy theory level of stupidity.