Robert f Kennedy jr

[randylahey]

Considering you "literally" made this post.....


Re: Robert f Kennedy jr
Report Quote
Post by randylahey » Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:10 pm

The criteria necessary for being vice president in this administration: must be black woman. They literally said that. Because identity politics is the democrats favorite thing to do

And yes they literally said that was what they were looking for. No kamala Harris isn't a particularly bright politician. But she fit the criteria


......I'm confident you will receive consideration for the award too.
You earned my vote.
Congrats!

How quickly you forget... that happened. Biden narrowed his finalists for vp down to a small group of minority women. If you were not a minority and a woman, you were not eligible to be his potential vp. Because it didn't fit the narrative they were trying to sell

So in other words, you are backtracking and admitting what you said ("The criteria necessary for being vice president in this administration: must be BLACK woman").
is 100% false?

You also said, "They literally said that".
That's 100% false too. Right?
Heck, You had repeated yourself by saying, "And yes they literally said that was what they were looking for".
WRONG.

Now you are saying, "If you were not a minority and a woman, you were not eligible to be his potential vp".
That's different than your original claim. Right? Guess what? You are still WRONG.

--------

How quickly I forget "that happened"? NO, I have NOT forgotten "THAT" did NOT happen.
I remember who many of the people were that were being seriously considered.
Why do I remember? Because I was personally involved in helping to coordinate some of the meetings with the potential "candidates" that were meeting with some of the people who were doing the vetting.
I remember personally welcoming those people to the meetings.
HELLO!
I typically have a not such a good memory but this is something I recall vividly.

Although, I will grant you that after going through the extensive process of choosing the VP, the last few "candidates" being considered were indeed primarily minority women - but NOT all of them were "BLACK - as YOU claimed - and not all were minority.
I fully admit I do NOT know who were the strongest "candidates" of the remaining few that were being considered and it very well may have come down to two or three of the final candidates being Black.

At NO point during at least the beginning, middle, and towards the end of the process, did "THEY" EVER "literally" say "MUST be black woman" and an NO point during at least the beginning, middle, and towards the end of the process, did "THEY" EVER "literally" say that was what "THEY" were looking for.
I challenge you to prove me wrong and more importantly, prove yourself right.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/21/politics ... index.html

[jfish26]

That seems to support gutter’s post, not yours. But marshaling evidence of things is not your strong suit.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

That seems to support gutter’s post, not yours. But marshaling evidence of things is not your strong suit.

randylahey, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post

By reading your (Fish) post I have to assume randy posted something ignorant and can't comprehend he doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.
Go figure. Right?

[Sparko]

Yup.

[randylahey]

Scary concept

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cxm3RjON ... FlYzFmZQ==

[mjl2]

Looks like he's going to do the independent run.

Alright Randy, you voting for Kennedy, or the guy who fast-tracked and promoted the vaccines? The guy who locked down the country for two weeks. The guy who put Fauci in charge of the response. The guy who raised the debt by almost 8 trillion dollars, half of that coming before COVID.

[jhawks99]

LOL

[mjl2]

Thing is, assuming RFKII goes through with this, I expect Democrat donors to form a PAC with an ad saying exactly those things.

Is it ethical? Mehhhhhh... probably not. But I mean, it's politics.

[Shirley]

Thing is, assuming RFKII goes through with this, I expect Democrat donors to form a PAC with an ad saying exactly those things.

Is it ethical? Mehhhhhh... probably not. But I mean, it's politics.

"The next generation is going to have to contend with the fact that we lost every important fight to amoral morons because we insisted on being polite while they cheated."
Michael Green

[Sparko]

Polite won't scour with fascists

[japhy]

I really like Jr as an alternative for those R's who think trumpty dumpty is just not Q enough. Let the R's know they need to promote crazier more drug addled candidates before they get your vote again.

[twocoach]

I really like Jr as an alternative for those R's who think trumpty dumpty is just not Q enough. Let the R's know they need to promote crazier more drug addled candidates before they get your vote again.

Yeah, it is feeling like he will peel more votes from Trump than he will Biden.

[jfish26]

I really like Jr as an alternative for those R's who think trumpty dumpty is just not Q enough. Let the R's know they need to promote crazier more drug addled candidates before they get your vote again.

Yeah, it is feeling like he will peel more votes from Trump than he will Biden.

Showing up at CPAC should help.

https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/06/excl ... wamy-cpac/

[JKLivin]

I really like Jr as an alternative for those R's who think trumpty dumpty is just not Q enough. Let the R's know they need to promote crazier more drug addled candidates before they get your vote again.

Yeah, it is feeling like he will peel more votes from Trump than he will Biden.

Showing up at CPAC should help.

https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/06/excl ... wamy-cpac/

If you look at the poll questions, it is pretty clear that it is NOT an indicator that it will peel Trump votes. Having a favorable impression of RFK is not the same as "I will vote for RFK over Trump."

[japhy]

I really like Jr as an alternative for those R's who think trumpty dumpty is just not Q enough. Let the R's know they need to promote crazier more drug addled candidates before they get your vote again.

Yeah, it is feeling like he will peel more votes from Trump than he will Biden.

Showing up at CPAC should help.

https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/06/excl ... wamy-cpac/

That's wut I'm talking about.

For those undecided voters who say, "I guess Joe is OK but he is just not socialist enough for me." JR is not really an option. But the uncommitted who think, "trumplethinskin is just not crazy enough for me", WELL have we got a DEAL for you!

JR is crazier than anyone else in the election! And now that he is going rogue you don't have to accept the Rs favorite nutter as your only choice. You can vote for Independent Nutcase JR!

Kind of ironic that it was R donors who bolstered his nutcase candidacy thinking he could split Uncle Joe's support.

But then self inflicted wounds seems to be the rule of the day for the tReason party.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

Percentage of THE votes the man will receive because his last name is Kennedy vs. if his last name was Smith?
I'm going to guess between 11% and 13%.

[twocoach]

Yeah, it is feeling like he will peel more votes from Trump than he will Biden.

Showing up at CPAC should help.

https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/06/excl ... wamy-cpac/

If you look at the poll questions, it is pretty clear that it is NOT an indicator that it will peel Trump votes. Having a favorable impression of RFK is not the same as "I will vote for RFK over Trump."

Suddenly you're a believer in the validity of polls.

[JKLivin]

Showing up at CPAC should help.

https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/06/excl ... wamy-cpac/

If you look at the poll questions, it is pretty clear that it is NOT an indicator that it will peel Trump votes. Having a favorable impression of RFK is not the same as "I will vote for RFK over Trump."

Suddenly you're a believer in the validity of polls.

Just pointing out that wording makes a difference. Sampling is another matter altogether.

[KUTradition]

Showing up at CPAC should help.

https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/06/excl ... wamy-cpac/

If you look at the poll questions, it is pretty clear that it is NOT an indicator that it will peel Trump votes. Having a favorable impression of RFK is not the same as "I will vote for RFK over Trump."

Suddenly you're a believer in the validity of polls.

funny how that happens

[randylahey]

Kennedy weighs in on the political divide. Which we obviously see on this board everyday

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/sta ... kVb9Q&s=19