What's my real argument?
Go back and read the thread.
I'll help you out:
I fully agree with you that he's helped us more than he's hurt us.pdub wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:15 amYou said this last night:
"He's a 1,000pt scorer.
I stand by the statement that he's helped us more than he's hurt us. Even relative to average scholarship players. We've had a lot of guys not do shit, or transfer, or get forced out, etc."
You agree with me but are still arguing.
LOL.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:39 am ended up the 6th most important player on the team during the important part of the season.
With this statement, one can only assume you didn't watch that game.
Shoots 47 and 46 percent from 3 his last 2 years. Inconsistent.NDballer13 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:55 am Ok, but still didn't answer the question. Other that inconsistent scoring numbers, what does he bring to make him "above average" in the Self era?
It depends. Need context. Need to look at roster composition.
I am pretty sure that missing games due to being injured should be viewed differently than missing games due to being an idiot.pdub wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:00 amMan Udoka and Embiid have some really bad stats then.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:58 amActually, Vick’s last game will likely be the last in a consecutive string of DNP-CD’s during the most important part of the conference season and all of the postseason. That’s way worse than the Kansas State game.
Even though box scores don’t do this, every game that Vick misses should be thought of as goose eggs and a hit to his stats per game average.