Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Kansas Football.
Post Reply
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35875
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by pdub »

Bean would have scored there.
User avatar
AlOerter
Contributor
Posts: 3216
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:02 pm

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by AlOerter »

Gotta believe Bean would have scored on that one.
User avatar
Back2Lawrence
Posts: 3162
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by Back2Lawrence »

Omg. If we score on 3rd, they might have :26 to go downfield.

PTSD engaged
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35875
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by pdub »

AlOerter wrote: Sat Nov 18, 2023 7:32 pm Gotta believe Bean would have scored on that one.
Yup.
lwh69ku
Posts: 595
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 3:03 pm

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by lwh69ku »

Don’t call timeout at 30 seconds. This half needs to end in a touchdown or field goal with 0 on the clock.
User avatar
Back2Lawrence
Posts: 3162
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by Back2Lawrence »

pdub wrote: Sat Nov 18, 2023 7:32 pm Bean would have scored there.
Yes
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35875
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by pdub »

Back2Lawrence wrote: Sat Nov 18, 2023 7:33 pm
pdub wrote: Sat Nov 18, 2023 7:32 pm Bean would have scored there.
Yes
Yea.
lwh69ku
Posts: 595
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 3:03 pm

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by lwh69ku »

Should have been 3 power runs. Why look to pass and leave time on the clock when Neal’s already got 2 TD??
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 17333
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by Sparko »

Interference in the endzone should have been at the 1 I thought.
User avatar
Back2Lawrence
Posts: 3162
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by Back2Lawrence »

This clock management is bullshit.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35875
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by pdub »

lwh69ku wrote: Sat Nov 18, 2023 7:34 pm Should have been 3 power runs. Why look to pass and leave time on the clock when Neal’s already got 2 TD??
Agree.
Or maybe one run wide.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 17333
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by Sparko »

Short side hash spot. And I agree. Three runs were needed
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17470
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by jhawks99 »

Wavin the wheat
Defense. Rebounds.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 17333
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: Sunflower Showdown Late Starting Game Thread. Pdub Approved, but it’s only because we starting 3rd string QB

Post by Sparko »

Whoo hoo! Dirty hit though
Post Reply