Women’s track and field controversy
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:22 am
Women’s track and field controversy
Are these parents right that it’s unfair?
https://usatodayhss.com/2018/connecticu ... k-athletes
For some context, compare:
Women’s world records in track and field:
https://www.thoughtco.com/womens-world-records-3259435
U.S. high school boys’ records in track and field:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U ... _and_field
https://usatodayhss.com/2018/connecticu ... k-athletes
For some context, compare:
Women’s world records in track and field:
https://www.thoughtco.com/womens-world-records-3259435
U.S. high school boys’ records in track and field:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U ... _and_field
“When you think of the good old days, think one word: dentistry.” — P.J. O’Rourke
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
If I had a daughter who finished 2nd I bet I would think it was unfair.
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:22 am
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
That’s the only way, huh?
“When you think of the good old days, think one word: dentistry.” — P.J. O’Rourke
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
Well, I don't really care about track, so I was just imagining a circumstance where i'd have a stronger stance on the issue.
I can see why people think it's unfair.
I can see why people think it's unfair.
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
would the situation and perceptions be different if we were talking about chromosomal anomalies?
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:22 am
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
I don’t understand the question.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:49 am would the situation and perceptions be different if we were talking about chromosomal anomalies?
For those who think that it’s just a question of hormones, there’s this, stating that the unfair advantages are not limited to hormones, but to differences in physiology:
https://spectator.org/the-testosterone- ... ns-sports/
“When you think of the good old days, think one word: dentistry.” — P.J. O’Rourke
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
i guess my point was that not all trans-gender people are the same, as far as what's going on in their body/mindkubandalum wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:31 amI don’t understand the question.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:49 am would the situation and perceptions be different if we were talking about chromosomal anomalies?
For those who think that it’s just a question of hormones, there’s this, stating that the unfair advantages are not limited to hormones, but to differences in physiology:
https://spectator.org/the-testosterone- ... ns-sports/
i don't know that i'd say there is an "unfair" advantage. there is an advantage, sure, but there are physiological differences among those that are "men" and "women" in classic sense. so, at what point to those differences become "unfair"?
i don't recall all the facts, but there were similar conversations surrounding Brittany Griner when she was at baylor. and yes, i know Griner isn't trans-gender.
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:22 am
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
More power to Griner. If it was unfair for her to compete then it also would have been unfair for Wilt to have competed in high school and college in his day.
You can’t go by just the exceptions. “According to a 2004 study of medical students and their spouses, the average male in his 20s can out-jump 95 percent of females in the same age group.” “...average male...”
https://slate.com/culture/2012/03/britt ... tball.html
You can’t go by just the exceptions. “According to a 2004 study of medical students and their spouses, the average male in his 20s can out-jump 95 percent of females in the same age group.” “...average male...”
https://slate.com/culture/2012/03/britt ... tball.html
“When you think of the good old days, think one word: dentistry.” — P.J. O’Rourke
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
Difficult subject with a lot at play.
One of the more memorable stories that relates to this issue was a story that came out about a year ago in what I believe was Texas:
There is a law/rule that student athletes must compete in the leagues according to the sex that is listed on their birth certificates. The spirit of the rule could very well be genuine, the discussion before the rule was presumably lacking, and the execution, of course, led to problems. A transgender student athlete that identified as male had long taken testosterone injections for reasons personal to him. He wanted to play soccer on the boys team, but hey they have that ironclad birth certificate rule. So he plays against the girls and dominates them. The parents get pissy and now hate the rule. Cuts both ways. Can't please anyone.
One of the more memorable stories that relates to this issue was a story that came out about a year ago in what I believe was Texas:
There is a law/rule that student athletes must compete in the leagues according to the sex that is listed on their birth certificates. The spirit of the rule could very well be genuine, the discussion before the rule was presumably lacking, and the execution, of course, led to problems. A transgender student athlete that identified as male had long taken testosterone injections for reasons personal to him. He wanted to play soccer on the boys team, but hey they have that ironclad birth certificate rule. So he plays against the girls and dominates them. The parents get pissy and now hate the rule. Cuts both ways. Can't please anyone.
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
I think this is one area where things are going a bit off the rails. I don't think a person born male with male body chemistry should be allowed to compete in girls sports. I don't think a person born female with artificially-male body chemistry should be allowed to compete in girls sports.
I recognize this creates a hole - a person born female with abnormally-but-naturally-male body chemistry competing against females. Them's the breaks (for the other females).
I recognize this creates a hole - a person born female with abnormally-but-naturally-male body chemistry competing against females. Them's the breaks (for the other females).
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
If you're born will balls and a dick you play men's sports. Or Trans sports. But not girls sports. Because you're not a girl in the sporting world....makes no difference which bathroom you pee in, who you fuck, or who you marry. Sports that are divided by gender should be divided by gender..not what you identify as.
Otherwise dedric should throw in some titty implants, slap in some hair extensions, and go be the best WNBA player in the history of the world.
Or make all sports coed and then there's no controversy. But then there's also going to be less female participation because in many sports they'd get dominated by male counterparts.
I'd like to see if there is a difference in world record time for various Olympic events in a sport like swimming.
Otherwise dedric should throw in some titty implants, slap in some hair extensions, and go be the best WNBA player in the history of the world.
Or make all sports coed and then there's no controversy. But then there's also going to be less female participation because in many sports they'd get dominated by male counterparts.
I'd like to see if there is a difference in world record time for various Olympic events in a sport like swimming.
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:22 am
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
Olympic records:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_O ... n_swimming
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_O ... n_swimming
“When you think of the good old days, think one word: dentistry.” — P.J. O’Rourke
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
I only needed to make it thru 3...
50M freestyle: 21.3 for men. 24.05 for women.
100M freestyle: 47.05 for men. 52.7 for women.
200M freestyle: 1:42.96 for men. 1:53.61 for women.
If you're born with a dick and balls then you should compete against men. Clearly men have an advantage based on world record times.
What a bizarre time we are living in. I should have played women's golf. I'd have been D1 and had a shot at the tour.
50M freestyle: 21.3 for men. 24.05 for women.
100M freestyle: 47.05 for men. 52.7 for women.
200M freestyle: 1:42.96 for men. 1:53.61 for women.
If you're born with a dick and balls then you should compete against men. Clearly men have an advantage based on world record times.
What a bizarre time we are living in. I should have played women's golf. I'd have been D1 and had a shot at the tour.
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
Well if your aunt had balls...
Re: Women’s track and field controversy
They should cut almost all tit sports except gymnastics, tennis, and any other ones where the chicks are not bulldykes.
Just my opinion, I'm cool with other ppl's perspectives.
Just my opinion, I'm cool with other ppl's perspectives.