We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Ugh.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18703
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by jfish26 »

Here's this thread in a nutshell.

I don't want to barber it or editorialize by giving it the tl;dr treatment, at least ahead of simply posting it in its entirety:

‘Our System Needs to Be Broken, and He Is the Man to Do It’

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/ ... r-00136850
BEDFORD, N.H. — “This,” Ted Johnson told me, “is what I hope.” We were here the other day at a bar not far from his house, and we were talking about Donald Trump and the possibility he could be the president again by this time next year. “He breaks the system,” he said, “he exposes the deep state, and it’s going to be a miserable four years for everybody.”

“For everybody?” I said.

“Everybody.”

“For you?”

“I think his policies are going to be good,” he said, “but it’s going to be hard to watch this happen to our country. He’s going to pull it apart.”

The notion that somebody might wish for the country’s dismantling would have sounded shocking coming from anybody, but it was especially jarring coming from Johnson. Because I was at a Nikki Haley town hall at the VFW in nearby Merrimack in the first week of September when Johnson stood up and asked her a question. He introduced himself as an independent voter and a retired soldier and said it felt like the nation was “in a civil war” and that some of his neighbors would hate him if he so much as put up a sign for her in his yard. On his mind, too, was his estrangement from his older brother — a rift the former president had done nothing but widen. He wanted to hear Haley’s plan “to pull us all back together.”

Haley at that moment was beginning to become the top non-Trump pick in the Republican primary process, slowly, steadily replacing Gov. Ron DeSantis. She pitched conservative policies with a more moderate mien, a split-the-difference escape hatch for MAGA movables to not have to outright denounce Trump but still turn the page. Could she finish second in Iowa? Could she win New Hampshire? Could she actually topple Trump? To do any of that, though, she needed a mix of GOP-leaning independents, Trump-averse Republicans and at-all-open-minded Trump voters. She needed Ted Johnson. And Ted Johnson was listening.

So Johnson’s journey from that VFW last fall to how he says he’s set to vote this week — a four-and-a-half-month turnabout from literally wanting to “pull us back together” to literally wanting to “pull it apart” — offers as instructive an insight as I’ve yet encountered into how on earth we are where we are. Trump could be just a disgraced ex-president facing time in prison. Instead, at least for now, he is a durably dominant political force credibly eyeing a return to the White House. And if Trump wins in New Hampshire on Tuesday (and polls say he probably will), and if he beats Joe Biden come November (and polls say he certainly might), it will be because of Johnson and the many thousands of others like him who looked for ways to quit Trump but ultimately couldn’t, didn’t and haven’t — and not remotely reluctantly but with an explicit sense of vengeance.

“He’s a wrecking ball,” Johnson told me here at the place he chose called the Copper Door.

“Everybody’s going to say, ‘Trump is divisive,’” he said, “and he’s going to split the country in half.” He looked at me. “We got it,” he said.

It’s what the Ted Johnsons want.

* * *

He’s 58. He’s married to his second wife and has three young adult sons. He was in the Army for 22 years — he retired as a lieutenant colonel — and now he is a senior project manager for an IT security company and works from home. He lives in a classic three-bedroom house he bought almost four years ago for $485,000 that’s now worth roughly a quarter-million dollars more. He’s originally from Centralia, Illinois, a town like too many towns in the more rural interior of the country that isn’t what it was. He was born in a hospital that no longer delivers babies. His father’s gallbladder several years back broke during a snowstorm and so he couldn’t be airlifted to the closest suitable medical facility in St. Louis. “So we just watched him die,” he said. Before he voted for Trump twice, he told me, he voted for Barack Obama twice. By September of 2023, though, he was thinking he was ready for someone else and so he went to the event for Haley.

Her answer was long. Too long. “You have to be able to take the divisions,” Haley said at one point over the course of nearly 10 minutes, and get people “to see the best of themselves to go forward.” The reaction in the room was mixed. But Johnson liked it. He had given her a few small donations before the town hall, according to FEC records, and he gave a few more after the town hall — adding up last year to $120.90 — not a mint but a show of support.

For Johnson, Trump had shifted from “being the rebel” to “being a rebel without a cause,” he told me then. But Haley? He called her “a leader.” He called her “more than qualified.” He was “behind her,” he said. “I’m looking for somebody that can bring us together and move us forward,” he said. “If we redo everything in the past, the country’s going to stay in the past, and it’s going to stay divided.” It was his hope, he said, that “she gets more momentum.”

In retrospect, though, some of what he said during our couple of conversations in the aftermath of that town hall should have been a warning. “You do your own reading and your own research, and you’re like, ‘What the hell’s happened to this country?’” he told me. He told me about one of his last conversations with his brother, Fred, very much anti-Trump. “He goes, ‘Well, what do you think about Jan. 6?’ And I said, ‘I thought it was Patriot’s Day.’” And we talked about polling. Trump’s “going to win, man,” he told me. “I’ve been watching the news tonight, and I was, like, ‘Holy shit, he’s 10 points ahead of Biden.’”

So I wasn’t totally surprised by the text I got earlier this month. But it was still kind of remarkable.

“Going with Trump,” Johnson told me.

He referred to Haley as “a flip flop RINO.” He said she “speaks to one side then to the other and thinks we are not paying attention.” Republicans were “just as crappy” as Democrats, and Trump, he said, “is really the new 3rd party.”

“Our system needs to be broken,” Johnson had concluded, “and he is the man to do it.”

* * *

“What happened?” I asked him now at the Copper Door.

“You know what happened?” he said.

“I got pissed.”

The rift with his brother remains — Ted and Fred Johnson don’t talk — but Ted and I talked for more than three hours.

The more he watched Haley, the less he liked her. She was too “scripted,” he said. She was “weak on the border,” he said. She was “a corporatist,” he said. She was “all in on Ukraine,” he said — echoing knowingly or not some of Trump’s attacks. Chris Sununu, the governor here, endorsed her. “That was a negative,” Johnson said. “He’s an elitist.” He liked the way Haley talked about abortion — “she threaded the needle, and she did a very good job on that.” But he came to not like her tone in her tussles with DeSantis and Vivek Ramaswamy during debates — a forum many felt she excelled in and credited for fueling her rise. “She should’ve took some higher ground when she started sparring with Vivek,” Johnson told me. “She came off worse because he doesn’t know any better,” he said.

“You know what made a big difference? A lot of the ads” that he saw mainly on Fox News, he said. Particularly successful on Johnson was an ad from a pro-Trump super PAC that had Haley “saying that illegal aliens were not illegal,” he told me. “I’m a black-and-white guy. You break the law, you break the law,” he said. “If I go out there and break the law, ain’t nobody going to help Ted Johnson. I’m going to jail.”’

Johnson started talking about “Russia-gate” and “Biden’s scandals” and Hunter Biden. What, I wondered, did Hunter Biden have to do with Nikki Haley? “She’s not going to hold anybody accountable for what they’ve done,” Johnson told me. “People need to be held accountable. That’s why you’ve got to break the system to fix the system,” he said. “Because it’s a zero-sum game right now. And to be honest with you, the Democrats are genius. They did anything they could do to win and gain power, even if they lie, cheat, steal. … What they’re doing is they’re destroying the country. Who could bring it back?” He answered his own question: “Trump’s the only one.”

“Nikki said — she said it — ‘We’re moving on,’ forget the past and what she called the chaos. Trump’s the chaos creator. But I don’t see her holding any of this accountable. I see her getting back in line, being a party swamp creature, continuing business as usual, but not holding all this mess that I see accountable. And I think a lot of people think like that.”

A lot of people do think like that. Not so long ago, though, Ted Johnson wasn’t one of them.

“What happened?” I asked again.

“They started prosecuting Trump for a bunch of crap. And I’ll be honest. I started feeling for the guy. I says, ‘Holy shit, what are they doing to this guy?’”

“Can you help me understand more why the legal actions against President Trump have bothered you so much?” I asked.

“January 6th,” he said. “January 6th was staged.”

“By?”

“The Democratic Party,” he said. “Nancy Pelosi.”

“Did you always think that?”

“At first I thought it was bad,” he said. “Until time came on and I’m starting to watch …”

“What are you starting to watch?”

“The hearings.”

“The actual hearings,” I said, “convinced you not that it was very terrible but that it was …”

“A setup,” he said. “They cherrypicked what they wanted to show. They cherrypicked what Trump actually said.”

And Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the part of the Constitution that prohibits people who tried to overthrow the government from running for office? “He didn’t do that,” Johnson said. “There was no insurrection. He said, ‘Go over there peacefully and protest.’ And so, for a guy like me, I am looking, and I’m saying, ‘Why is everybody so hellbent on getting Trump in jail or getting him not to win?’”

“What’s your answer to that question?” I asked.

“They’re afraid as hell, because this time around he’s going to take the DOJ, he’s going to take the bureaucracy of the FBI, the CIA, all the stupid intel agencies that don’t do shit, and he’s going to upset the apple cart,” he said.

I referred to the argument Trump is now making over and over that he’s going to go after them because he says they’re going after him but really they’re going after you — his supporters.

“That’s exactly the way I feel,” Johnson said.

“Did you feel like that before he said that,” I said, “or did he say that and you said yes?”

“He said that, and I said yes,” he said.

“And trust me, the guy’s a pig, he’s a womanizer — arrogant a-----e,” Johnson said of Trump. “But I need somebody that’s going to go in and lead, and I need somebody that’s going to take care of the average guy.”

“But is taking care of the average guy and breaking the system the same thing?” I said.

“Yes,” he said. “Because they’re all in it for themselves.”

“And if you break the system, what does that look like?”

“Accountability,” he said.

And so I asked about the four criminal indictments against Trump — the attempts to hold him accountable.

The federal election interference case in Washington? “I don’t see it,” he said. “There was no insurrection.” The porn star hush money case in New York? “Totally ridiculous.” The sweeping election interference case in Georgia? “Jury’s out on what’s going on there.” And the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case in Florida? It’s the one that gives Johnson a modicum of pause. “You don’t f--- around with classified material. Whoever advised him he could have that — he should have gave that s--- up,” he said. “But he was being the stubborn, arrogant person that he is.” And he added, “I didn’t like the way the FBI did it. The raid was ridiculous. And that just emboldened me.”

“What if that went to trial and he was convicted?” I asked. “Should he still be electable?”

“What’s the law say?” he said.

“Don’t do that,” I said. “That’s what the law says.”

“Accountability is accountability. But they’re throwing so much stuff at this guy, and it’s almost like I’m rooting for him,” he told me. “This is a whole system of government going after one man who, probably, I bet, right now, 85 million people want to be president.”

“But accountability is accountability,” I said.

“Accountability is accountability,” he said.

“Whether it’s Hunter Biden or Donald Trump,” I said.

“But do I trust the system?” he said. “I don’t.”

“You’re a veteran,” I told him. “You are somebody who doesn’t trust the system that in the broadest sense you served.”

“I have no trust,” he said.

“The system you served,” I said again.

“That’s right. I swore an oath,” he said. “I believed in that oath.”

“When did you stop believing?” I asked Ted Johnson.

“About when Trump became president,” he answered.
There are probably millions of people just like this.

I do not think Johnson is lying about his feelings. I think he has been lied TO, over and over and over and over and over again, and those lies are causing genuinely-held (but wrongly-conceived) feelings that are simply detached from objective reality.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21083
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by twocoach »

It's just sad to see that level of brainwashing. When it suits him he's “She’s not going to hold anybody accountable for what they’ve done,” Johnson told me. “People need to be held accountable. That’s why you’ve got to break the system to fix the system,”

and when it suits him not to hold anyone accountable he's “Accountability is accountability. But they’re throwing so much stuff at this guy, and it’s almost like I’m rooting for him,” he told me. “This is a whole system of government going after one man who, probably, I bet, right now, 85 million people want to be president.”

These people don't even have a moral center any more. Every thought and moral now seems to come with a "my side/their side" slider where their feelings on something change based on whether it benefits their side or punishes the other side of their argument.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 17335
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by Sparko »

Johnson himself fits the deep state monicker. As a real veteran, he draws a pretty large pension and health care entitlements. That they will zero out. Trump hates real veterans. Make him look bad.

He is basically mad at people who disagree with his stupid takes and he thinks they should be punished. Entitlement. His pension and prosperity would go to hell along with his aged radicalism quickly. A man doing well is willing to give it up to deny prosperity to others. Nutshell MAGA
Last edited by Sparko on Tue Jan 23, 2024 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18703
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by jfish26 »

Can't even really articulate who he's mad at, or what he's mad over, or how "breaking the system" could help right whatever the wrong is.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 17335
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by Sparko »

jfish26 wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 12:29 pm Can't even really articulate who he's mad at, or what he's mad over, or how "breaking the system" could help right whatever the wrong is.
The people who see him as a deluded nut. Narcissists don't brook dissent. It is clinically dangerous in him
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16589
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by Shirley »

Thanks fish, that was thoroughly depressing.

Image
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
RainbowsandUnicorns
Contributor
Posts: 12517
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by RainbowsandUnicorns »

Help me out. Is this not worthy of being considered contempt?

https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1749880532366729352
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13916
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by KUTradition »

can we just let tejas secede already?

armpit of the country…
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16589
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by Shirley »

Every time you think DeSantis is the absolute worst, Gregg Abbott says "hold my beer".

Image
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
Overlander
Contributor
Posts: 6190
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by Overlander »

KUTradition wrote: Wed Jan 24, 2024 7:26 am can we just let tejas secede already?

armpit of the country…
That makes Florida the scrotum
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18703
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by jfish26 »

Overlander wrote: Wed Jan 24, 2024 4:14 pm
KUTradition wrote: Wed Jan 24, 2024 7:26 am can we just let tejas secede already?

armpit of the country…
That makes Florida the scrotum
SIMPSONS DID IT

Image
Overlander
Contributor
Posts: 6190
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by Overlander »

Too much credit.
Let Maine be Americas little penis.
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17473
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by jhawks99 »

jfish26 wrote: Wed Jan 24, 2024 5:04 pm
Overlander wrote: Wed Jan 24, 2024 4:14 pm
KUTradition wrote: Wed Jan 24, 2024 7:26 am can we just let tejas secede already?

armpit of the country…
That makes Florida the scrotum
SIMPSONS DID IT

Image
Looks kind of, you know.... flaccid
Defense. Rebounds.
User avatar
zsn
Contributor
Posts: 3808
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by zsn »

Traitorous nature of Republicans haven’t changed in 44 years. Reagan made a deal with the Iranians not to release the hostages until after the election.

Now Trump. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-bo ... 6fc770ae46
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16589
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by Shirley »

zsn wrote: Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:00 am Traitorous nature of Republicans haven’t changed in 44 years. Reagan made a deal with the Iranians not to release the hostages until after the election.

Now Trump. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-bo ... 6fc770ae46
Republicans committing treason goes back even farther than that. It appears to be in their DNA.

Trump encouraging Putin to interfere in the 2016 election by hacking Hillary's emails is merely one of the latest examples that we know of. Republicans have a history of treason stretching back decades. Nixon sabotaging the Paris peace talks during during the 1968 presidential campaign contributed to another ~ 20,000 American deaths, and who knows how many more Vietnamese?

Nixon’s Vietnam Treachery

Richard M. Nixon always denied it: to David Frost, to historians and to Lyndon B. Johnson, who had the strongest suspicions and the most cause for outrage at his successor’s rumored treachery. To them all, Nixon insisted that he had not sabotaged Johnson’s 1968 peace initiative to bring the war in Vietnam to an early conclusion. “My God. I would never do anything to encourage” South Vietnam “not to come to the table,” Nixon told Johnson, in a conversation captured on the White House taping system.

Now we know Nixon lied. A newfound cache of notes left by H. R. Haldeman, his closest aide, shows that Nixon directed his campaign’s efforts to scuttle the peace talks, which he feared could give his opponent, Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey, an edge in the 1968 election. On Oct. 22, 1968, he ordered Haldeman to “monkey wrench” the initiative.

The 37th president has been enjoying a bit of a revival recently, as his achievements in foreign policy and the landmark domestic legislation he signed into law draw favorable comparisons to the presidents (and president-elect) that followed. A new, $15 million face-lift at the Nixon presidential library, while not burying the Watergate scandals, spotlights his considerable record of accomplishments.

Haldeman’s notes return us to the dark side. Amid the reappraisals, we must now weigh apparently criminal behavior that, given the human lives at stake and the decade of carnage that followed in Southeast Asia, may be more reprehensible than anything Nixon did in Watergate.

Nixon had entered the fall campaign with a lead over Humphrey, but the gap was closing that October. Henry A. Kissinger, then an outside Republican adviser, had called, alerting Nixon that a deal was in the works: If Johnson would halt all bombing of North Vietnam, the Soviets pledged to have Hanoi engage in constructive talks to end a war that had already claimed 30,000 American lives.

But Nixon had a pipeline to Saigon, where the South Vietnamese president, Nguyen Van Thieu, feared that Johnson would sell him out. If Thieu would stall the talks, Nixon could portray Johnson’s actions as a cheap political trick. The conduit was Anna Chennault, a Republican doyenne and Nixon fund-raiser, and a member of the pro-nationalist China lobby, with connections across Asia.

“! Keep Anna Chennault working on” South Vietnam, Haldeman scrawled, recording Nixon’s orders. “Any other way to monkey wrench it? Anything RN can do.”


Nixon told Haldeman to have Rose Mary Woods, the candidate’s personal secretary, contact another nationalist Chinese figure — the businessman Louis Kung — and have him press Thieu as well. “Tell him hold firm,” Nixon said.

Nixon also sought help from Chiang Kai-shek, the president of Taiwan. And he ordered Haldeman to have his vice-presidential candidate, Spiro T. Agnew, threaten the C.I.A. director, Richard Helms. Helms’s hopes of keeping his job under Nixon depended on his pliancy, Agnew was to say. “Tell him we want the truth — or he hasn’t got the job,” Nixon said...


Image
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
RainbowsandUnicorns
Contributor
Posts: 12517
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by RainbowsandUnicorns »

Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by ousdahl »

Man, that Nixon story is wild.

If I may ask as non-antagonistically as possible, and we’re once again involved in no shortage of foreign wars, and since it’s an election year…

What would the reaction be among Biden supporters if he started pushing for peace in places like Ukraine or Israel? Or at least pushing the rhetoric of peace?

Would he gain supporters? Loose supporters? Maybe not alienate so many of the younger and more progressive voters he kind of needs? Maybe be knee-jerk ridiculed as a Putin parrot?

Genuinely asking.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16589
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by Shirley »

ousdahl wrote: Thu Jan 25, 2024 7:47 am Man, that Nixon story is wild.

If I may ask as non-antagonistically as possible, and we’re once again involved in no shortage of foreign wars, and since it’s an election year…

What would the reaction be among Biden supporters if he started pushing for peace in places like Ukraine or Israel? Or at least pushing the rhetoric of peace?

Would he gain supporters? Loose supporters? Maybe not alienate so many of the younger and more progressive voters he kind of needs? Maybe be knee-jerk ridiculed as a Putin parrot?

Genuinely asking.
Biden keeps trying to get Bibi to back off and Bibi keeps telling Biden to go fuck himself. So, Biden needs to talk to the Israeli people directly, and tell them the current situation can't go on because it's not in Israel's or anyone else's long-term interests. The majority of Israeli's know Biden has their best interests at heart, know that US support is vital to their very existence, and they will know what they need to do to start bringing about the necessary change.

If I were him, I'd keep it vague and let them wonder what restrictions we'd begin placing on our aide in the future.

I realize it would be fraught with all sorts of problems including for Biden domestically, but Bibi has a vested interest in prolonging the war to stay out of prison, and this can't go on.

If anyone has a better idea, ____________.

As far as Ukraine, doing anything less than defeating Putin sends an undeniable message to all our allies and adversaries. China, N Korea, Iran, Russia, et al, would all be emboldened, and our allies would conclude that we're unreliable and can't be trusted to keep our word.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13916
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by KUTradition »

nothing like wanting to embolden terrorists and tyrants in the name of “peace”

(in quotes purposefully)
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16589
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: We Lost the Battle for the Republican Party’s Soul Long Ago

Post by Shirley »

I'm embarrassed for Tim Scott. I never thought very much of him, but I could barely think less of him now.

Craven pussies like him, Cruz, Rubio, DeSantis, Lindsay Graham, etc., etc., are why we can't have nice things.
Last edited by Shirley on Thu Jan 25, 2024 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
Post Reply