twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:20 amQ needs to at the very least define "quality," in the sense of not having to take the time to hit the Emergicare for a round of antibiotics after the date.Shirley wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 3:00 pm^
Like a million other things that are totally subjective and might not be true for or apply to anyone else...
One of the more valuable lessons I learned very early into the ~ 10 years between my marriages was that, much to my infinite and total surprise, it was actually possible to be bored with an attractive naked woman. It saved me an immense amount of time not feeling the need to go to Westport with my male friends on Fri and Sat nights hoping to get laid, and it dovetailed nicely with my increasing awareness of and insight into infectious diseases, and inclination for quality* over quantity.
* "quality" in the sense of having taken the time to form some emotional attachment first.
Your experience may differ
Rereading what I wrote again this morning, to be fair, in the case of "are you down for car sex" setting the tone...the expectations...and lack thereof, that mitigates the circumstances immensely compared to what I was referring to. In the 80s into the early 90s, at least in my experience, casual sex was but the opening gambit*. An expectation of the future was implicit, and knowing I didn't share the feeling turned the woman into a victim, in my eyes, made me feel like a phony, and took the fun out of it. (I know, right? WTAF?)
When you look at the definition of "gambit", the metaphors for what I'm talking about leap off the page.
*gambit - a device, action, or opening remark, typically one entailing a degree of risk, that is calculated to gain an advantage
(in chess) an opening in which a player makes a sacrifice, typically of a pawn, for the sake of some compensating advantage
“In investing, What is comfortable is rarely profitable.”
Robert Arnott
Which is to say, investments don't give extravagant returns until and unless you take some risk.