Well, we do have actual results to discuss. Like getting blown the eff out by a non-tourney team, two weeks ago tomorrow. And, as trad points out, Michigan nosediving.TDub wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2024 10:06 amwe've done this.jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2024 9:23 amOk. But your opinion would, I guess, be different had we won 33 games this year?TDub wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 5:04 pm
the guy is overrated based on empty stats. I dont like him, I'm not gonna like him. I dont think he helps a team win. My point going to high school is that it seems whatever team he is there are 2 constants, his stat line is always good, his team doesn't win.....I dont think those things are coincidences.
Which would have required better players around him, yes?
Or would you be saying, based on his Michigan and high school (???) team success, that clearly what happened is the better players finally dragged him along into winning?
why do we keep doing this what if dance when we have actual results to discuss?
For me personally, my opinion of him wouldn't change. I would be happier with our season results, however, and would have to admit that the roster construction did, indeed, work.
Just like I think the majority of fan anxiety over the changes is really more about the portal (than about money), I think the majority of fan anxiety over Hunter is really more about the changes than Hunter's actual contributions.