Sounds like the Hunter Biden court hearings are getting spicy.you Nazi piece of shit!
Charges
Re: Charges
Nero is an angler in the lake of darkness
Re: Charges
oh, I thought you were just quoting Qusdahl and I was wondering what I did this time....
Just Ledoux it
Re: Charges
I am happy to have Schiff do his thing in the House, and soon, in the Senate, and keep doing it for a long time. Becoming President would diminish his power to hold the hacks accountable.Shirley wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 1:11 pm I often find myself wondering if Adam Schiff wouldn't make a good president someday.
This is excellent. It's beginning to look like a campaign strategy for Democrats, from Biden down, is to make those convicted-felon supporting "law and order party" cowards, wear their shame.
Good, more of this, please:
Adam Schiff Slams House Republicans for Anti-Justice Antics at Merrick Garland Hearing
Re: Charges
He'd make a great President, if and when the party gets over its need to unilaterally defang itself out of a misplaced expectation of even good faith from the other side.
Re: Charges
According to Phil Bump of the WaPo, a Survey Monkey poll shows that 1/3rd of independents haven't heard the Trump election fraud (hush money) trial verdict.
smh
smh
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Derek Cressman
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12444
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: Charges
1/3 of Independent voters probably have a better life than I do because they don't know about the verdict. I'm confident more often than not, ignorance is (or at last can be) bliss.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: Charges
Bliss ends at the concentration camp. Information is golden.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13876
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Charges
some 80% of pub voters believe that Biden orchestrated the NY trial
jfc
jfc
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Charges
I genuinely don't know how we recover from this brain rot.KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:13 am some 80% of pub voters believe that Biden orchestrated the NY trial
jfc
-
- Posts: 5028
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:35 pm
Re: Charges
Yikes.KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:13 am some 80% of pub voters believe that Biden orchestrated the NY trial
jfc
Was it possibly/partially politically motivated? Sure. Almost everything seems to be in one way or another nowadays. But orchestrated? Come on.
And it's not like he didn't actually do most of/all of what they're accusing him of doing.
Re: Charges
The histrionics over selective prosecution/bias are profoundly silly. Particularly in light of, you know, everything we're learning about at least two of the sitting R justices, and in light of Hunter Biden being subject to a fair trial as we speak, and in light of Trump's express promises to vindictively and selectively prosecute - with or without evidence.DeletedUser wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:29 amYikes.KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:13 am some 80% of pub voters believe that Biden orchestrated the NY trial
jfc
Was it possibly/partially politically motivated? Sure. Almost everything seems to be in one way or another nowadays. But orchestrated? Come on.
And it's not like he didn't actually do most of/all of what they're accusing him of doing.
-
- Posts: 5028
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:35 pm
Re: Charges
I'm with you.jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:34 amThe histrionics over selective prosecution/bias are profoundly silly. Particularly in light of, you know, everything we're learning about at least two of the sitting R justices, and in light of Hunter Biden being subject to a fair trial as we speak, and in light of Trump's express promises to vindictively and selectively prosecute - with or without evidence.DeletedUser wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:29 amYikes.KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:13 am some 80% of pub voters believe that Biden orchestrated the NY trial
jfc
Was it possibly/partially politically motivated? Sure. Almost everything seems to be in one way or another nowadays. But orchestrated? Come on.
And it's not like he didn't actually do most of/all of what they're accusing him of doing.
Re: Charges
Hush money sentencing delayed from July 11 til at least September
Re: Charges
Trump is all over the Epstein documents. Many "massages"
Re: Charges
Too bad those can't be 'leaked.'
Re: Charges
There’s gonna be a fairly-YOLO emptying of the books over the next few months. All bets are off.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 6120
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: Charges
And, it won’t matter.
Not one single bit
Not one single bit
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13876
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Charges
MSNBC:
There was very bad news for Donald Trump in Monday’s Supreme Court decision, and arguably even worse news for candidate Trump. That’s because Mike Pence is going to walk into a federal courtroom, raise his right hand, take an oath to tell the truth, and testify against Trump in this case in September for an evidentiary hearing.
What Monday’s decision did was give Trump absolute immunity applying to one paragraph of the indictment. The rest of the indictment goes back to Judge Tanya Chutkan’s courtroom, where the Supreme Court has ordered her to have a hearing about the evidence in the case to determine whether Trump’s actions were “official acts,” meaning they may be protected by immunity, or not. That goes for everything in the case, except for one conversation that Trump had with the acting attorney general...
There was very bad news for Donald Trump in Monday’s Supreme Court decision, and arguably even worse news for candidate Trump. That’s because Mike Pence is going to walk into a federal courtroom, raise his right hand, take an oath to tell the truth, and testify against Trump in this case in September for an evidentiary hearing.
What Monday’s decision did was give Trump absolute immunity applying to one paragraph of the indictment. The rest of the indictment goes back to Judge Tanya Chutkan’s courtroom, where the Supreme Court has ordered her to have a hearing about the evidence in the case to determine whether Trump’s actions were “official acts,” meaning they may be protected by immunity, or not. That goes for everything in the case, except for one conversation that Trump had with the acting attorney general...
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?