SCOTUS

Ugh.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 15906
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Shirley »

jfish26 wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2024 3:12 pm Yeah, started hearing that back when it happened. Nothing we have seen since cuts against that idea.
^^^
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13151
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by KUTradition »

Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18060
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jfish26 »

Very hard for me NOT to think about monkey business whenever we are talking about a leaked Court decision the day prior to the sole 2024 debate, where the subject matter is probably the difference in the election.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 16970
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Sparko »

Gosh. They have tried to sound reasonable since the 'machine gun kids' decision last week. While shielding Trump as many days as possible
User avatar
zsn
Contributor
Posts: 3750
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

Re: SCOTUS

Post by zsn »

They also ruled that corruption is OK. So, there’s that. At least two “justices” should have recused.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 15906
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Shirley »

zsn wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 9:12 pm They also ruled that corruption is OK. So, there’s that. At least two “justices” should have recused.
It's OK if you do it, as long as you don't talk about or agree to it beforehand.
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 16970
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Sparko »

zsn wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 9:12 pm They also ruled that corruption is OK. So, there’s that. At least two “justices” should have recused.
Oh. I thought they ruled that republicans can't be corrupt unless they fight corruption.
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13151
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by KUTradition »

SCOTUS rules that corruption is ok so long as payment comes after (essentially putting themselves up for sale), but they won’t say whether or not the POTUS can legally murder (or have murdered) a political opponent?

wtf is wrong with this country?
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18060
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jfish26 »

KUTradition wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:28 pm SCOTUS rules that corruption is ok so long as payment comes after (essentially putting themselves up for sale), but they won’t say whether or not the POTUS can legally murder (or have murdered) a political opponent?

wtf is wrong with this country?
The very first line of the dissent was quite a shot across the bow (of the yacht).
Officials who use their public positions for private gain threaten the integrity of our most important institutions.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federa ... ast%20acts.
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13151
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by KUTradition »

emergency abortions allowed…for now
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17088
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jhawks99 »

KUTradition wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:57 pm emergency abortions allowed…for now
Sounds like they decided not to decide, again.
Broham
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18060
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jfish26 »

jhawks99 wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 2:35 pm
KUTradition wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:57 pm emergency abortions allowed…for now
Sounds like they decided not to decide, again.
Alito even bemoaned, in writing, that the Court avoided deciding because (in effect) it's an election year.

Don't tell me the Court isn't political. Not that - eyes July 3 and November 5 on the calendar - we needed any more proof.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 15906
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Shirley »

jhawks99 wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 2:35 pm
KUTradition wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:57 pm emergency abortions allowed…for now
Sounds like they decided not to decide, again.
Like any number of other issues the court is or will be dealing with in the near future, a Trump DOJ will have very different motivations than the Biden DOJ does. So, much like Judge Cannon, why decide anything now, when you can wait?
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13151
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by KUTradition »

prepare for the onslaught of J6 convictions being overturned…sigh
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13151
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by KUTradition »

and…

The Supreme Court overturns Chevron doctrine, gutting federal environmental protections

(but Biden’s old…)
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18060
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jfish26 »

KUTradition wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 1:58 pm and…

The Supreme Court overturns Chevron doctrine, gutting federal environmental protections

(but Biden’s old…)
The impact of this decision cannot be overstated. Just a brazen, enormous power grab by justices that would (performatively, clearly) break out in hives at the mention of the phrase activist judge.
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17088
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jhawks99 »

How will SCOTUS kick the donnie decision down the road?
Broham
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 20233
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by twocoach »

jhawks99 wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 7:43 am How will SCOTUS kick the donnie decision down the road?
They didn't; we now have kings as President who can do whatever they want under the guise of it being an "official act" of their Presidency.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18060
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jfish26 »

twocoach wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 9:52 am
jhawks99 wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 7:43 am How will SCOTUS kick the donnie decision down the road?
They didn't; we now have kings as President who can do whatever they want under the guise of it being an "official act" of their Presidency.
Which means the ONLY protection that remains, is the ballot box. And that protection might become a nullity next January.

The MICHs of the world can joke about protest votes and gas prices and what the fuck ever until the cows come home.

No person who genuinely loves America can vote for anyone but Biden this November. Any other vote is a vote for a king.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: SCOTUS

Post by ousdahl »

Wait…does this mean Biden too has at least the next 6.5 months to officially do whatever the fuck he wants?
Post Reply