SCOTUS
Re: SCOTUS
i will trust that you and the other keyboard commanders will have it under control.
godspeed to you.
godspeed to you.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12449
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: SCOTUS
I think you are correct, and yet, I also think the opposite is true too.
That things are too much in control, by people who I feel shouldn't be making the decisions that they are making.
So, where if anywhere do we go from here?
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13888
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: SCOTUS
presuming everything is going to be “ok” (not that you are) seems willfully ignorant
what recourse is there?
it seems the only one is the ballot box
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12449
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: SCOTUS
Maybe. Hopefully? Hopefully not? My head spins a bit thinking about it.KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 12:02 pmpresuming everything is going to be “ok” (not that you are) seems willfully ignorant
what recourse is there?
it seems the only one is the ballot box
Yes, helps make me want to vote for Biden more than Trump but I am just one moron. What will all the other morons in our country do?
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: SCOTUS
The ballot box, this fall.KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 12:02 pmpresuming everything is going to be “ok” (not that you are) seems willfully ignorant
what recourse is there?
it seems the only one is the ballot box
It is amazing, to me, that people will simply not listen to what Trump and Project 2025 are TELLING YOU OUT LOUD they will do. And for which the path has been very graciously paved for him/them, and which path they will burn to the ground behind them to keep anyone from catching them from behind.
I am very concerned that we are so polarized that people will not take even the five minutes needed to understand just how dramatically the Court has moved our country toward unrestrained authoritarianism in just the last WEEK.
There now is no recourse at law in the case the President uses "core" powers to punish his enemies - including by imprisoning them, or worse - or enrich himself and his friends.
None.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 6128
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: SCOTUS
So, this Novembers election will be monitored by Right Wing goons, empowered and swooning with the pardon promise.
Tabulations NOT in their favor will likely be met with violence.
If indeed Trump loses, there is no way the Right will accept the result.
Trump gets back into power, one way or the other.
I said a year ago that the US probably had its’ last actual election in 2020.
I was made fun of.
Tabulations NOT in their favor will likely be met with violence.
If indeed Trump loses, there is no way the Right will accept the result.
Trump gets back into power, one way or the other.
I said a year ago that the US probably had its’ last actual election in 2020.
I was made fun of.
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
Re: SCOTUS
I think this one will be fair, so long as "real" margins are significant.Overlander wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 1:15 pm So, this Novembers election will be monitored by Right Wing goons, empowered and swooning with the pardon promise.
Tabulations NOT in their favor will likely be met with violence.
If indeed Trump loses, there is no way the Right will accept the result.
Trump gets back into power, one way or the other.
I said a year ago that the US probably had its’ last actual election in 2020.
I was made fun of.
Failing that, and/or after that, all bets are off.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13888
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: SCOTUS
AOC Looks to Impeach Supreme Court Justices After Trump Immunity Ruling. That’s Only Happened Once, in 1805
https://people.com/aoc-impeach-supreme- ... %20results.
Of the eight articles of impeachment served to Chase [\i](the only justice ever impeached), the final one claimed that he regularly promoted his political ideologies while serving on the Supreme Court, therefore "tending to prostitute the high judicial character with which he was invested, to the low purpose of an electioneering partizan," as per the Senate's website.
https://people.com/aoc-impeach-supreme- ... %20results.
Of the eight articles of impeachment served to Chase [\i](the only justice ever impeached), the final one claimed that he regularly promoted his political ideologies while serving on the Supreme Court, therefore "tending to prostitute the high judicial character with which he was invested, to the low purpose of an electioneering partizan," as per the Senate's website.
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13888
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: SCOTUS
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: SCOTUS
aoc is the biggest dingbat in Washington. and that is saying something.
Re: SCOTUS
Yea, but that had nothing to do with pols bored prophecies, that was just cuz you…nm
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13888
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: SCOTUS
hold my beer…
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: SCOTUS
^^^^^
Talk to me if AOC ever has a sex move named after her
Talk to me if AOC ever has a sex move named after her
Re: SCOTUS
you still leaving for a couple months in November? got room for 4 more? ha....I kid, but...not really. I fear it's gonna get ugly no matter what happens. I'm not looking forward to the next 2-15 years depending on how things shake outOverlander wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 1:15 pm So, this Novembers election will be monitored by Right Wing goons, empowered and swooning with the pardon promise.
Tabulations NOT in their favor will likely be met with violence.
If indeed Trump loses, there is no way the Right will accept the result.
Trump gets back into power, one way or the other.
I said a year ago that the US probably had its’ last actual election in 2020.
I was made fun of.
Just Ledoux it
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 6128
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: SCOTUS
Honestly thinking about it. Will Trump force an Executive Order that people who voted Dem can never re-enter the country?TDub wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:34 pmyou still leaving for a couple months in November? got room for 4 more? ha....I kid, but...not really. I fear it's gonna get ugly no matter what happens. I'm not looking forward to the next 2-15 years depending on how things shake outOverlander wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 1:15 pm So, this Novembers election will be monitored by Right Wing goons, empowered and swooning with the pardon promise.
Tabulations NOT in their favor will likely be met with violence.
If indeed Trump loses, there is no way the Right will accept the result.
Trump gets back into power, one way or the other.
I said a year ago that the US probably had its’ last actual election in 2020.
I was made fun of.
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
Re: SCOTUS
there are innumerable concerns I have about how the essential King commandment will play outOverlander wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:46 pmHonestly thinking about it. Will Trump force an Executive Order that people who voted Dem can never re-enter the country?TDub wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:34 pmyou still leaving for a couple months in November? got room for 4 more? ha....I kid, but...not really. I fear it's gonna get ugly no matter what happens. I'm not looking forward to the next 2-15 years depending on how things shake outOverlander wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 1:15 pm So, this Novembers election will be monitored by Right Wing goons, empowered and swooning with the pardon promise.
Tabulations NOT in their favor will likely be met with violence.
If indeed Trump loses, there is no way the Right will accept the result.
Trump gets back into power, one way or the other.
I said a year ago that the US probably had its’ last actual election in 2020.
I was made fun of.
Just Ledoux it
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12449
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: SCOTUS
I would say she is undoubtably ONE of the biggest dingbats. That's not really saying much.
P.S. After I made my post I see Trad provided 2 examples of "big" dingbats. There are more. Both female and male.
Back to the SCOTUS.
As I have been doing often lately, I typed in a word/subject/whatever in to the search on X/Twitter to see what is the first thing that pops up. Shockingly, today, this didn't have a "rightwing" bias.
Supreme Court resulted in this......
https://twitter.com/marlene4719/status/ ... 3664864340
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12449
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: SCOTUS
Question for anyone to answer.
I admit my ignorance. Supposedly Congress (and "the states"?) have SOME power over the Supreme Court.
I have read that "Congress" does NOT have the authority to "abolish" the Supreme Court but let's say the Supreme Court went especially nutso and made horrible decisions that would lead to the destruction of the country. What powers are in place to prevent it from happening?
I admit my ignorance. Supposedly Congress (and "the states"?) have SOME power over the Supreme Court.
I have read that "Congress" does NOT have the authority to "abolish" the Supreme Court but let's say the Supreme Court went especially nutso and made horrible decisions that would lead to the destruction of the country. What powers are in place to prevent it from happening?
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: SCOTUS
In general, the idea is that the legislative branch makes the law, the executive branch enforces the law and the judicial branch interprets the law.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 10:09 am Question for anyone to answer.
I admit my ignorance. Supposedly Congress (and "the states"?) have SOME power over the Supreme Court.
I have read that "Congress" does NOT have the authority to "abolish" the Supreme Court but let's say the Supreme Court went especially nutso and made horrible decisions that would lead to the destruction of the country. What powers are in place to prevent it from happening?
So in theory, the judicial branch should fill in the gaps in laws passed by Congress.
That theory falls apart some when the judicial branch takes an expansive view of its role, including by overzealously (and I would say selectively) declaring some laws to be illegal in the womb (sorry).
No law that is not the Constitution trumps the Constitution.
And so if your question is specific to - can Congress legislate away from this week’s Supreme Court holding as to the President’s immunity under the Constitution as it sits…the answer is probably not. And it will be the Court that answers the question…so you tell me how you think that goes.
And so the short answer to that question is that fixing this problem - which is now the law of the land - almost certainly requires an amendment to the Constitution. Which, considering the approval threshold for those, seems highly unrealistic any time soon.