Today in "so much winning"!
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
The audit was more bullshit from Trump.
Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
I don't believe this shit.
I was assured when Trump was elected that the republic was dead!
How is this possible?
I was assured when Trump was elected that the republic was dead!
How is this possible?
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
More like Trumpmagoo.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
I swear, that's not what I was told.
At the risk of being culturally insensitive, I kinda feel ripped off.
At the risk of being culturally insensitive, I kinda feel ripped off.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
wow...
https://www.newsweek.com/jared-kushner- ... ls-1371897
and ivanka using personal emails for govt work?
could they be any dumber? particularly after the clinton email bs...
https://www.newsweek.com/jared-kushner- ... ls-1371897
and ivanka using personal emails for govt work?
could they be any dumber? particularly after the clinton email bs...
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Isn’t this the same shit that DC wanted the FBI to lock up Cankles for?
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Make fun of you for not being able (or willing) to read?
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Oh no, it's crazy cool that you do that.
But, it is too bad that you are referencing an article that I wasn't commenting on.
That is the danger you run of constantly trying to prove that you are the smartest guy in the room.
But, it is too bad that you are referencing an article that I wasn't commenting on.
That is the danger you run of constantly trying to prove that you are the smartest guy in the room.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Oh good, one of DC's heroes, and one of the architects of republican Gov. Sam Brownback's "economic experiment" in Kansas, that was by any objective measure a calamitous failure, is being nominated for the Fed? Considering Trump is nominating him, this makes perfect sense. smfh
President Donald Trump says he will nominate Stephen Moore, a prominent conservative economist, to fill a vacancy on the Federal Reserve’s seven-member board.
Moore served as an economic adviser to Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign, helping to draft Trump’s tax cut plan...
The other person involved in designing Brownback's economic failure was Arthur Laffer, he of "Trickle Down Economics" fame, who helped Reagan nearly triple America's national debt.
President Donald Trump says he will nominate Stephen Moore, a prominent conservative economist, to fill a vacancy on the Federal Reserve’s seven-member board.
Moore served as an economic adviser to Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign, helping to draft Trump’s tax cut plan...
The other person involved in designing Brownback's economic failure was Arthur Laffer, he of "Trickle Down Economics" fame, who helped Reagan nearly triple America's national debt.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
So...when you wrote "Ivanka said it was ok...so....it's ok," you weren't commenting on the article about Ivanka?jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 11:14 am Oh no, it's crazy cool that you do that.
But, it is too bad that you are referencing an article that I wasn't commenting on.
That is the danger you run of constantly trying to prove that you are the smartest guy in the room.
Weird.
That is danger you run of being dipshit.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
I'm certain Plano will be along any minute to explain to me that when you wrote "Laffer, he of "Trickle Down Economics" fame," that you weren't referring to that Art Laffer, but "trickle-down" has nothing to do with Laffer. He didn't use the term. He certainly didn't apply it to supply-side theory or Reaganomics.
You must have him confused with the other Art Laffer, the one named David Stockman.
And BTW, Steve is not my hero.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto