JKLivin wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2024 12:21 pm
pdub wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2024 12:16 pm
There is no proof the election was "stolen".
There has been countless hours put into confirming this even when it was already clear.
The analogy is very valid.
But validity is not your ( or your candidate's ) strong suit, clearly.
The people in charge of "investigating" are also the ones in whose best interest it is to find no evidence of wrongdoing. It is no different than North Carolina athletics "investigating" itself for evidence of academic fraud and finding nothing. Completely illegitimate.
It's not at all.
Because there was actual proof of academic fraud in the UNC case -- the NCAA just didn't have any power ( or didn't want to bite the hand that feeds them/wake the bear ) to rule on the case. In fact, the AP had plenty of smoke where there was fire but they clearly couldn't force a judgement.
Several independent organizations, including the AP ( no, it's not a puppet of the Democrats or the Deep State ) did exhaustive digging into the claims of voter fraud -- no evidence was found. On top of that, firms that DONALD TRUMP HIRED to investigate, all came out and said all claims were false. Were those firms part of the DEEP STATE?!
So no, your analogy sucks, much like you.