Kamala! Fuck Yeah!

[randylahey]

Trump's refusal to debate Kamala again.

Why would he need to? He has already debated multiple candidates in 2024, which is a ridiculous situation. Democrats got hammered on a few key issues that voters really care about: the economy, inflation, and immigration. They feel their campaign slipping away and if they get desperate enough for another debate, they'll probably have to go on fox News or x to do it. Trump always goes onto left leaning networks to do the debates, and democrats won't agree to go onto a right leaning or even neutral network

[defixione]

I still don't understand your angst behind the selection of Harris, by a political party that you would never vote for. Can you explain?

[twocoach]

It's not an accident that we saw the earliest presidential debate in election cycle history this year when Trump debated biden. Biden did terrible and it's what ended his quest for reelection. It was a way to gage his prospects of reelection and ultimately exposed the need for a switch to a new puppet.

By stringing biden along before the people, if created a path for the dems to forego an actual primary. They didn't have to risk the democrat voters electing a non puppet for the party's nominee, since kamala was horribly unpopular in 2020

So your theory is that the Democratic Party rigged everything so that they could install someone who was unpopular? Got it.

You do realize how stupid that is, right?

Sadly it's what happened. And you dildos are all enthusiastic about a candidate you never voted for, and who was unpopular when she actually ran for nomination is 2020

Yes, it happened "cuz you say so" . OK, cool story.

[jfish26]

Trump's refusal to debate Kamala again.

Why would he need to? He has already debated multiple candidates in 2024, which is a ridiculous situation. Democrats got hammered on a few key issues that voters really care about: the economy, inflation, and immigration. They feel their campaign slipping away and if they get desperate enough for another debate, they'll probably have to go on fox News or x to do it. Trump always goes onto left leaning networks to do the debates, and democrats won't agree to go onto a right leaning or even neutral network

CNN is not (as presently constituted) a left-leaning network. Nor is CBS.

The fact is that Trump got humiliated by Harris (as he was humiliated in other settings, for example at the National Association of Black Journalists panel), and is now deeply afraid of being challenged in public.

He is, and has always been, scared of and by powerful women.

The fact that Harris is also a prosecutor (criminals don't like those) and a minority (Trump doesn't like those) is just more.

[japhy]

He is, and has always been, scared of and by powerful women.

Seems to be a lot of that going around.

A muthafuckin pandemic of it I tell ya!

Somebody should be checking into the records of that secret lab in Ukraine, or the one in China.

[randylahey]

Name one state kamala won a primary in???

[jfish26]

Name one state kamala won a primary in???

Name one election Trump won the popular vote in???

[randylahey]

Kamala did not win a single primary in any state. Why is she even a nominee? That's not how democracy works. If democrat voters actually want to "save democracy" as you guys have been saying, you simply can't vote for kamala

[jfish26]

Kamala did not win a single primary in any state. Why is she even a nominee? That's not how democracy works. If democrat voters actually want to "save democracy" as you guys have been saying, you simply can't vote for kamala

You should direct your newfound passion for the democratic process to the actions and words of the candidate who ACTUALLY tried to disenfranchise 81+ million voters last time around.

[jfish26]

Is this what talked you guys into voting for her? Lol

Your insecurity here makes sense in the broader context of what masculinity - virility, strength, power - means in MAGAland.

Stephen Miller Gives Tips on Women in Vomit-Inducing Fox Segment

Fox News’s Jesse Watters asked Trump adviser Stephen Miller what his tips are as a “sexual matador.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/186971/ber ... mark-cuban

Here’s something no one asked for: sex and dating advice from Donald Trump’s ex-adviser Stephen Miller.

While appearing on Jesse Watters’s Fox News program, Miller, who was seen as “the true driving force” behind Trump’s racist agenda during his presidency, was asked to give relationship advice to the network’s viewers.

Watters claimed that Fox was “getting a lot of texts from women about Miller,” and that his audience sees him as a “sexual matador.”

“What do you have to say for yourself?” asked Watters.

Miller responded with advice for young men.

[…]

“The best thing you can do is to wear your Trump support on your sleeve,” said Miller. “Show that you are a real man, show that you are not a beta. Be a proud and loud Trump supporter and your dating life will be fantastic.”

[japhy]

I still don't understand your angst behind the selection of Harris, by a political party that you would never vote for. Can you explain?

Has your question been answered?

I would like to hear the answer as well? Maybe I missed it.

My guess is the Dems can pick their candidate any way they want, by any rules they decide upon, or change. In the end the voters will decide whether or not they like the candidate and whether the party made a mistake. The point of nominating a candidate is to win the election.

[jfish26]

I still don't understand your angst behind the selection of Harris, by a political party that you would never vote for. Can you explain?

Has your question been answered?

I would like to hear the answer as well? Maybe I missed it.

My guess is the Dems can pick their candidate any way they want, by any rules they decide upon, or change. In the end the voters will decide whether or not they like the candidate and whether the party made a mistake. The point of nominating a candidate is to win the election.

And of course you’re hitting on the most important distinction.

A voter that doesn’t like Harris in 2024, may simply choose not to vote for Harris in 2024.

A voter that didn’t like Trump in 2020, and voted for Biden in 2020, would have been disenfranchised by Trump illegally stealing the election in 2020.

“Apples and hand grenades” has never been more apt.

[DrPepper]

It's mystifying how Randy keeps claiming Kamala was unpopular in 2020, so how could she be the nominee in 2024? Well, I don't listen to his radio stations. But if he would try to think for himself, I think it would be obvious that she has had some wwesome preparation for the job in the last four years. This simply isn't 2020 anymore, Randy.

[twocoach]

I still don't understand your angst behind the selection of Harris, by a political party that you would never vote for. Can you explain?

It is nothing more than a bothsiderism to counter to the claims that Trump is a hazard to the Democratic process. By trying to stand up the nomination of Harris as some sort of attack on the Democratic process, then they can claim that it's really the Democrats that have done it and not the GOP.

[jfish26]

It's mystifying how Randy keeps claiming Kamala was unpopular in 2020, so how could she be the nominee in 2024? Well, I don't listen to his radio stations. But if he would try to think for himself, I think it would be obvious that she has had some wwesome preparation for the job in the last four years. This simply isn't 2020 anymore, Randy.

Critically, not only has Harris improved since 2020, but 2024 calls for something much different than did 2020.

[jfish26]

I still don't understand your angst behind the selection of Harris, by a political party that you would never vote for. Can you explain?

It is nothing more than a bothsiderism to counter to the claims that Trump is a hazard to the Democratic process. By trying to stand up the nomination of Harris as some sort of attack on the Democratic process, then they can claim that it's really the Democrats that have done it and not the GOP.

Ding ding ding.

It’s not any different, really, from contrived uproars in other areas.

[twocoach]

I still don't understand your angst behind the selection of Harris, by a political party that you would never vote for. Can you explain?

It is nothing more than a bothsiderism to counter to the claims that Trump is a hazard to the Democratic process. By trying to stand up the nomination of Harris as some sort of attack on the Democratic process, then they can claim that it's really the Democrats that have done it and not the GOP.

Ding ding ding.

It’s not any different, really, from contrived uproars in other areas.

The powers of the GOP started out questioning whether her rise to be the nominee was legal. They quickly learned that it is. Winning a primary does not mean that the delegates for that state are legally required to promise their support for that person.

Then they started down this whole shtick as a means to just flood the zone with shit and the people like Randy who don't think about what they post have continued to do the heavy lifting on it.

It's just more meaningless noise.

[defixione]

So, Trump appeals to the gullible, the easily proselytized, the non-curious, the moralless and those that set aside morals for personal gain, the racist, and the poorly educated citizens of the US.

[KUTradition]

Trump's refusal to debate Kamala again.

Why would he need to? He has already debated multiple candidates in 2024, which is a ridiculous situation. Democrats got hammered on a few key issues that voters really care about: the economy, inflation, and immigration. They feel their campaign slipping away and if they get desperate enough for another debate, they'll probably have to go on fox News or x to do it. Trump always goes onto left leaning networks to do the debates, and democrats won't agree to go onto a right leaning or even neutral network

CNN is not (as presently constituted) a left-leaning network. Nor is CBS.

The fact is that Trump got humiliated by Harris (as he was humiliated in other settings, for example at the National Association of Black Journalists panel), and is now deeply afraid of being challenged in public.

He is, and has always been, scared of and by powerful women.

The fact that Harris is also a prosecutor (criminals don't like those) and a minority (Trump doesn't like those) is just more.

i’m sure randi is plenty threatened by women like Harris as well

[KUTradition]

Kamala did not win a single primary in any state. Why is she even a nominee? That's not how democracy works. If democrat voters actually want to "save democracy" as you guys have been saying, you simply can't vote for kamala

that’s exactly how OUR CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY works

you’re one proudly (and loudly) ignorant sob