You can make an argument for either. But I think it is being done because the real polls have her leading so they can prop this nonsense Polymarket poll as an example of their "we only lost because it's rigged" argument.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 6:55 am You guys are smarter than me. Does a candidate having rigged polls in their favor help the candidate more or hurt the candidate more - and why?
2024
Re: 2024
Re: 2024
Agreed. Maybe it depresses turnout knowing they have such a lead. Maybe it motivates those with a "more, more, more!" attitude. But I honestly think it is just being done to seek "look what I did for you" favor with Trump to win attention and praise to get an audience to eventually seek an expected reward.
Re: 2024
You're constantly trying to impress. It's obvious and obnoxious. I'm also not surprised that you can't see it.Overlander wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 10:25 pmNever made an attempt to impress anyone. Although I have clearly made quite the impression on you.
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander
Re: 2024
I agree that it is absurd, and I've tried to refrain. Some people I've just determined to ignore; others, however, have proven to be so egregious that I refuse to let them slide. It's ridiculously simple: leave me alone, and I leave you alone; address me respectfully and I will extend the same courtesy.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 6:16 am Overlander and JK being assholes to each other. Again. And Again. And Again. And Again.
The not funny thing is that while I admit it makes me roll my eyes and is semi annoying, I admit I do laugh at some absurd unaware things they post about themself and each other.
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander
Re: 2024
The only thing that bothers me about you is that you are, at your core, a bully. You expect - even demand - to be able to treat others cruelly and contemptuously and not get the same in return. I refuse to stand by and act like that is okay.Overlander wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 10:24 pmMaybe a bunch of us chose better careers…better partners… better investments.JKLivin wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 10:17 pmFunny, but the only people I know of who keep saying that are the same ones who keep insisting that we’re doing great economically now and that having 10 million + illegals running around is actually good for our nation. That pretty much tells me all I need to know.TDub wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2024 9:33 pm
I'm not sure how we live on the same planet, speak the same language, are theoretically both capable of reading and writing.....and you've somehow come to the conclusion you have with any justification.
He did nothing for the economy, that's a myth perpetuated by people who can't read and don't understand economics. How's that wall going....how many Pesos did Mexico chip in?
We don’t have to hate women, brown people, people who have more assets…because we made our own way and left the likes of you in our wake.
It really seems to bother you what I do for a living. It definitely bothers you that I have never had a partner cheat on me. And it definitely bothers you that no matter how superior in intellect that you claim to be… no matter how strong you pretend to be, you project a sad and pathetic image to all here.
Well, except Randy. You are clearly smarter than him.
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13386
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: 2024
KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 7:32 am it’ll be no different, locally, than it is now - psych and randi posting lies like they’re going out of style
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12086
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: 2024
YesKUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 7:04 amin this particular instance, i think it serves to set up the narrative that benefits trump should he lose…it provides “evidence” of Dem shenanigansRainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 6:55 am You guys are smarter than me. Does a candidate having rigged polls in their favor help the candidate more or hurt the candidate more - and why?
i can’t think of another instance (not involving trump), where there was the appearance of such things
randylahey wrote: Thu Sep 26, 2024 7:33 pm
Rainbows I'm sorry you have nothing better to do than to go digging stuff up on a message board.
Rainbows I'm sorry you have nothing better to do than to go digging stuff up on a message board.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12086
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12086
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: 2024
Yes.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 7:32 amYou can make an argument for either. But I think it is being done because the real polls have her leading so they can prop this nonsense Polymarket poll as an example of their "we only lost because it's rigged" argument.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 6:55 am You guys are smarter than me. Does a candidate having rigged polls in their favor help the candidate more or hurt the candidate more - and why?
But - Are there no "real" polls that have Trump leading? I typically try to pay attention to polls but I have lost interest in polls after the Trump/Hillary debacle.
randylahey wrote: Thu Sep 26, 2024 7:33 pm
Rainbows I'm sorry you have nothing better to do than to go digging stuff up on a message board.
Rainbows I'm sorry you have nothing better to do than to go digging stuff up on a message board.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13386
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: 2024
nationally?
i haven’t seen one
one might claim Rasmussen, but i hardly consider that poll unbiased
edit: fwiw… https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/
but even if the national polls were “right”, that hardly matters (much like the eventual popular vote). swing state polling, and results unfortunately, are all that matters
i haven’t seen one
one might claim Rasmussen, but i hardly consider that poll unbiased
edit: fwiw… https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/
but even if the national polls were “right”, that hardly matters (much like the eventual popular vote). swing state polling, and results unfortunately, are all that matters
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: 2024
Who knows, I dont find them to be relevant. They haven't been accurate in either of the last 2 elections.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 11:32 amYes.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 7:32 amYou can make an argument for either. But I think it is being done because the real polls have her leading so they can prop this nonsense Polymarket poll as an example of their "we only lost because it's rigged" argument.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 6:55 am You guys are smarter than me. Does a candidate having rigged polls in their favor help the candidate more or hurt the candidate more - and why?
But - Are there no "real" polls that have Trump leading? I typically try to pay attention to polls but I have lost interest in polls after the Trump/Hillary debacle.
Re: 2024
I met my MO State Rep today. She knocked on my door and introduced herself, Rep. Jamie Johnson. We talked for about 15 minutes and I told her we voted for her in the 2020 election and would again this year.
It wasn't until I shut the door that I remembered the 2020 race. She was running against an R ultra-MAGA jackass who I know well. We figured he would win in a red county in a red state. But the Dem black woman who had never run for office before, won in a 90% white, red voting county. Hopefully she pulls off the upset again.
It wasn't until I shut the door that I remembered the 2020 race. She was running against an R ultra-MAGA jackass who I know well. We figured he would win in a red county in a red state. But the Dem black woman who had never run for office before, won in a 90% white, red voting county. Hopefully she pulls off the upset again.
Nero is an angler in the lake of darkness
Re: 2024
2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
MICHIGAN
51,463 Votes for Stein
10,704 Trump’s lead over Clinton
PENNSYLVANIA
49,941 Votes for Stein
44,292 Trump’s lead over Clinton
WISCONSIN
31,072 Votes for Stein
22,748 Trump’s lead over Clinton
Just a reminder what voting “third-party” gets you.
MICHIGAN
51,463 Votes for Stein
10,704 Trump’s lead over Clinton
PENNSYLVANIA
49,941 Votes for Stein
44,292 Trump’s lead over Clinton
WISCONSIN
31,072 Votes for Stein
22,748 Trump’s lead over Clinton
Just a reminder what voting “third-party” gets you.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 5799
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: 2024
Just as Steve Bannon planned. The Trump campaign pumped tons of money into the Jill Stein campaign to get that result.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 2:52 pm 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
MICHIGAN
51,463 Votes for Stein
10,704 Trump’s lead over Clinton
PENNSYLVANIA
49,941 Votes for Stein
44,292 Trump’s lead over Clinton
WISCONSIN
31,072 Votes for Stein
22,748 Trump’s lead over Clinton
Just a reminder what voting “third-party” gets you.
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time