Today in "so much winning"!

Ugh.
User avatar
Geezer
Posts: 3474
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:23 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by Geezer »

The audit was more bullshit from Trump.
Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
dolomite
Contributor
Posts: 1903
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:26 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by dolomite »

Geezer wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:45 pm The audit was more bullshit from Trump.
Proof, link?
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16609
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by DCHawk1 »

I don't believe this shit.

I was assured when Trump was elected that the republic was dead!

How is this possible?
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
zsn
Contributor
Posts: 3816
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by zsn »

DCHawk1 wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2019 1:28 pm I don't believe this shit.

I was assured when Trump was elected that the republic was dead!

How is this possible?
In the immortal words of Miracle Max........"[the republic]....is only mostly dead" :)
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by DCHawk1 »

But...but...but...Trumphitler!
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
defixione
Contributor
Posts: 2842
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:42 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by defixione »

More like Trumpmagoo.
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by DCHawk1 »

I swear, that's not what I was told.

At the risk of being culturally insensitive, I kinda feel ripped off.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Deleted User 89

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by Deleted User 89 »

wow...

https://www.newsweek.com/jared-kushner- ... ls-1371897

and ivanka using personal emails for govt work?

could they be any dumber? particularly after the clinton email bs...
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by ousdahl »

Isn’t this the same shit that DC wanted the FBI to lock up Cankles for?
Deleted User 89

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by Deleted User 89 »

seems worse, but what do i know...
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by DCHawk1 »

ousdahl wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:13 am Isn’t this the same shit that DC wanted the FBI to lock up Cankles for?
link?
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Deleted User 62

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by Deleted User 62 »

Ivanka said it was ok...so....it's ok.
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by DCHawk1 »

jeepinjayhawk wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:52 am Ivanka said it was ok...so....it's ok.
ewe Kant reid?
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Deleted User 62

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by Deleted User 62 »

DCHawk1 wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:54 am
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:52 am Ivanka said it was ok...so....it's ok.
ewe Kant reid?
It's so cute when you do that.
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by DCHawk1 »

Make fun of you for not being able (or willing) to read?
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Deleted User 62

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by Deleted User 62 »

Oh no, it's crazy cool that you do that.

But, it is too bad that you are referencing an article that I wasn't commenting on.

That is the danger you run of constantly trying to prove that you are the smartest guy in the room.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16609
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by Shirley »

Oh good, one of DC's heroes, and one of the architects of republican Gov. Sam Brownback's "economic experiment" in Kansas, that was by any objective measure a calamitous failure, is being nominated for the Fed? Considering Trump is nominating him, this makes perfect sense. smfh

President Donald Trump says he will nominate Stephen Moore, a prominent conservative economist, to fill a vacancy on the Federal Reserve’s seven-member board.

Moore served as an economic adviser to Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign, helping to draft Trump’s tax cut plan...

The other person involved in designing Brownback's economic failure was Arthur Laffer, he of "Trickle Down Economics" fame, who helped Reagan nearly triple America's national debt.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by DCHawk1 »

jeepinjayhawk wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 11:14 am Oh no, it's crazy cool that you do that.

But, it is too bad that you are referencing an article that I wasn't commenting on.

That is the danger you run of constantly trying to prove that you are the smartest guy in the room.
So...when you wrote "Ivanka said it was ok...so....it's ok," you weren't commenting on the article about Ivanka?

Weird.

That is danger you run of being dipshit.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Today in "so much winning"!

Post by DCHawk1 »

Feral wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 12:16 pm
The other person involved in designing Brownback's economic failure was Arthur Laffer, he of "Trickle Down Economics" fame,
I'm certain Plano will be along any minute to explain to me that when you wrote "Laffer, he of "Trickle Down Economics" fame," that you weren't referring to that Art Laffer, but "trickle-down" has nothing to do with Laffer. He didn't use the term. He certainly didn't apply it to supply-side theory or Reaganomics.

You must have him confused with the other Art Laffer, the one named David Stockman.

And BTW, Steve is not my hero.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Post Reply