JKLivin wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:32 pm
Shirley wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:28 pm
JKLivin wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 9:10 pm
This from a guy who backed an obvious looser to the bitter end and insisted that she was going to win all the way. For such a smart guy, your own "agenda-addled" brain failed to see the inevitable landslide looming ahead. Dum or deceived?
What a lame, desperate, laughable, conflation.
Did I ever say that Harris was going to win? Where? I'll wait...
There's a difference between hoping that a candidate running for an elective office will win, and believing absolute bullshit, just because you want it to be true, and because your delicate cult leader is too fragile to admit he lost, and says it's true.
I'd think you'd be able to recognize the difference, that you can't, says a lot.
I'm smart enough to see and back a winner. That says all there is to say. Enjoy being a looser.
Nice to know you're the same vacuous shell of a human being I "met" when I signed on to .com ~ two decades ago. Don't ever change, you "winner", you...
I couldn't have anything remotely related to do with a piece of shit like Trump, and consider myself a "winner"*. I guess that's the difference between me and you; you lack class, self-respect, and judgement.
Don't ever change, just keep blaming someone else. After all, what else have you've got?
*Which is not to say that, when it comes to benefitting from Trump's upcoming tax cuts for people who don't need them, I won't be a "winner", then. Does that mean I should thank, you?