trump’s promises

[Overlander]

Whatever happens, happens.

And with that, Democracy died.

[twocoach]

Whatever happens, happens.

And with that, Democracy died.

It's just confirmation that it wasn't about any of the issues. Not the economy, not prices, not illegal immigrants. It's only about wanting to be on the "winning team" and the desire to see your way of life and world view "validated" by election results.

[jfish26]

Whatever happens, happens.

And with that, Democracy died.

It's just confirmation that it wasn't about any of the issues. Not the economy, not prices, not illegal immigrants. It's only about wanting to be on the "winning team" and the desire to see your way of life and world view "validated" by election results.

...with profoundly stupid disregard for how much we have all benefited from a US-centric world order.

And how much even the "winning team" has to lose from that disappearing - except for the ultra-wealthy (who have successfully conned the merely rich into thinking are part of a single team).

Patrick Mahomes and, I dunno, Matt Araiza are both on the same team. I presume Araiza doesn't believe he has anything in common with Mahomes, financially speaking.

But in our present situation, the Araizas of the world have been conned into thinking that the interests of the Mahomeses of the world are aligned with theirs. They most certainly are not.

[Overlander]

Startling jolt to the central nervous system of the Trumpistas enroute.

But don’t worry, another scapegoat to blame is in the works

[MICHHAWK]

for the foreseeable future. old uncle and his party will be to blame.

and by "foreseeable" i mean-2-3 years. we will do a deep dive after that period.

so no. we don't have to find another "scapegoat." we have our scapegoat.

[jfish26]

Startling jolt to the central nervous system of the Trumpistas enroute.

But don’t worry, another scapegoat to blame is in the works

Leopards and, like, foxes are on the "consumer" side of the food chain.

Foxes are instinctually aware that leopards will eat foxes.

Your petty tyrants - your assorted rich, but not ultra-wealthy, Trump supporters - seem to have zero awareness that they're on the goddamn menu here.

[jfish26]

for the foreseeable future. old uncle and his party will be to blame.

and by "foreseeable" i mean-2-3 years. we will do a deep dive after that period.

so no. we don't have to find another "scapegoat." we have our scapegoat.

Whoa whoa whoa.

Is this a modified big chair analysis???

[MICHHAWK]

i'm now distracted by leopards and foxes and their sorts. and how they pertain.

[Overlander]

for the foreseeable future. old uncle and his party will be to blame.

and by "foreseeable" i mean-2-3 years. we will do a deep dive after that period.

so no. we don't have to find another "scapegoat." we have our scapegoat.

Of course.
You cannot operate without one.

Pretty handy. When Biden took over, you claimed that everything had to be his fault, because he was in the "Big Boy Chair".

That goal post has now been moved, it seems?

[MICHHAWK]

in case you forgot. old uncle is still in the big boy chair.



i know. it's hard to tell.

[Overlander]

So, does his tenure as the scapegoat end mid January 2025?

[MICHHAWK]

was dt off the hook the day old uncle was sworn in.

[KUTradition]

so, NOW we get analyze a presidency for 2-3 years after it ends?

[MICHHAWK]

it would seem that this board has spent more time analyzing dt's presidency than they have old uncles.

dontcha think.

[Overlander]

was dt off the hook the day old uncle was sworn in.

At the time, and according to you?
Yes

[twocoach]

for the foreseeable future. old uncle and his party will be to blame.

and by "foreseeable" i mean-2-3 years. we will do a deep dive after that period.

so no. we don't have to find another "scapegoat." we have our scapegoat.

Sorry, but your rule was "the guy in the big chair is responsible". You don't get to change the rule once you like the guy in the big chair.

[jfish26]

for the foreseeable future. old uncle and his party will be to blame.

and by "foreseeable" i mean-2-3 years. we will do a deep dive after that period.

so no. we don't have to find another "scapegoat." we have our scapegoat.

Sorry, but your rule was "the guy in the big chair is responsible". You don't get to change the rule once you like the guy in the big chair.

Big guy changes rules all the time. If changing rules all the time is good for the big guy, it's good for MICH.

[Overlander]

In some ways, I envy Mich.
Going through life with the awareness of a toddler HAS to have some benefits.

[jfish26]

In which the war on brown people becomes a grift (at the expense, we can be sure, of Democrat-led cities and states).

[dolomite]

Taking a lot for granted here?