zsn wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:02 am
JKLivin wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 7:02 am
jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 9:00 pm
God damn it, these cretins are too dumb to even laugh at.
I may be showing my cretin-ness here, but aren’t the reservoirs in L.A. filled with water that is piped down from the North of the state, where they have had record snowfall/rains/flooding?
Somebody somewhere said “No, thanks. We don’t need any.”
I don’t think cretin-ness is the word you’re looking for.
Once and for all: there’s no water shortage, no matter what ignoranuses (someone who is not just ignorant but also an asshole - eg. Trump, Musk) say. It’s a last-mile problem. The infrastructure was not designed to handle the need for water on this scale. It’s akin you having thousands of dollars in your bank account but you’re short of cash because no bank is open and the ATMs are inoperable.
It's substantially the same issue as brownouts or breached levees.
Our infrastructure was designed - as makes perfect sense - to be able to routinely (and without thought, effort, pain, or even really
noticing) handle problems in the middle of the bell curve.
And, with increasing thought, effort and pain, to handle problems along the narrower ends of the curve.
But we humans have shifted the curve profoundly; we now
routinely see "once-in-a-century" climatological events. And for political reasons, there has never been a will to spend prudently on preemptive measures; instead, we spend MUCH more expensively and unproductively on emergency measures.
And of course: you know who very much
does believe in human-caused climate change? Those notoriously liberal, woke, progressive
insurance companies.