Here we go....

Ugh.
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by DCHawk1 »

It's almost like the last two years nevar happened.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
dolomite
Contributor
Posts: 1897
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:26 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by dolomite »

defixione wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:27 pm I find it telling that they won yet they're still whining about Obama and Hillary. lol
They're the ones probably responsible for starting the whole investigation mess in the first place.
Dossier, FBI, JFC.
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
dolomite
Contributor
Posts: 1897
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:26 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by dolomite »

defixione wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:27 pm I find it telling that they won yet they're still whining about Obama and Hillary. lol
I'd say it's more crowing than whining.
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
User avatar
defixione
Contributor
Posts: 2841
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:42 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by defixione »

dolomite wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2019 12:50 am
defixione wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:27 pm I find it telling that they won yet they're still whining about Obama and Hillary. lol
I'd say it's more crowing than whining.
That's what you think it sounds like.
seahawk
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 7:38 pm

Re: Here we go....

Post by seahawk »

21 million people losing their health insurance, 133 million subject again to pre-existing condition exclusions.

Seems like the whining could get quite loud.
Don't inject Lysol.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16509
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by Shirley »

dolomite wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 4:29 pm
Feral wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:57 am

And, considering how important healthcare was to voters in 2018, the fact that the ACA has 50% support and only 37% are against it in a Kaiser poll this month, Democrats will gladly take those odds.
I love it when people bring up polls. Cankles had been given what, a 90% chance to win the election. Thank God for collusion. I guess that dossier backfired on her. LOL
I know you'd rather talk about the 2016 election, but the abject idiocy of Trump making a 180 degree turn by threatening cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, and exposing Americans to the uncertainty and even greater financial predation by health insurance companies by removing protection for pre-existing conditions, children from their parent's insurance, et al., is hard to quantify, or exaggerate. In the 2018 election where democrats made historic gains, > 50% of media spots for democrats emphasized our nation's tenuous health care system. We can't thank the drama queen in the WH enough, whose reality TV mentality obsession/compulsion to incite friction and conflict in the populace is an act that's getting old, even for republicans.

House GOP leader urged Trump to hold off on latest ObamaCare assault

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) recently told President Trump he didn't agree with the administration's effort to have the Affordable Care Act deemed invalid in federal court, according to a source familiar with the conversation.

...Some Republicans have been more vocal about their frustrations with the administration’s decision.

House Republican Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) argued the president’s timing hurt what could have been one of the best messaging weeks of his administration following the outcome of special counsel Robert Mueller's report and success in holding up his veto on a bill admonishing his national emergency declaration.

“He didn’t have to do it now," she told Fox News.
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by DCHawk1 »

Image
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
seahawk
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 7:38 pm

Re: Here we go....

Post by seahawk »

Heard Sibelius yesterday saying it was actually closer to 150 million that will be back in the pre-existing condition group.
Don't inject Lysol.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by ousdahl »

yeah, but discussing the facts is no match for DC's gif of a squirrel dressed like a horse!
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by DCHawk1 »

Shouldn't you be screeching at Seahawk and Feral to get back on topic?
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
dolomite
Contributor
Posts: 1897
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:26 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by dolomite »

DCHawk1 wrote: Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:10 am Shouldn't you be screeching at Seahawk and Feral to get back on topic?
Shirley's (I mean Feral's) law.
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
User avatar
defixione
Contributor
Posts: 2841
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:42 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by defixione »

Yeah, let's get back on topic. What's to loose if the full report, minus national security redactions, is turned over to John Doe?
dolomite
Contributor
Posts: 1897
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:26 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by dolomite »

defixione wrote: Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:58 am Yeah, let's get back on topic. What's to loose if the full report, minus national security redactions, is turned over to John Doe?
Hey defix, just wondering, do you not know the difference between “lose” and “loose”?
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by DCHawk1 »

defixione wrote: Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:58 am Yeah, let's get back on topic. What's to loose if the full report, minus national security redactions, is turned over to John Doe?
Two weeks, apparently.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Deleted User 62

Re: Here we go....

Post by Deleted User 62 »

dolomite wrote: Fri Mar 29, 2019 9:32 pm
defixione wrote: Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:58 am Yeah, let's get back on topic. What's to loose if the full report, minus national security redactions, is turned over to John Doe?
Hey defix, just wondering, do you not know the difference between “lose” and “loose”?
You must be new here
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16509
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by Shirley »

url=https://thehill.com/homenews/news/43588 ... ler-report]84 percent want Mueller report made public[/url]

A large majority back the public release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report, according to a new Quinnipiac poll released Tuesday.

Eighty-four percent of respondents said the report should be made public, according to the survey, with only 9 percent saying it should not. Among Republicans, the divide was slightly smaller, but still stark, with 75 percent supporting release of the report and 17 percent opposing it.

[...]
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
dolomite
Contributor
Posts: 1897
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:26 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by dolomite »

Feral wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2019 8:53 am url=https://thehill.com/homenews/news/43588 ... ler-report]84 percent want Mueller report made public[/url]

A large majority back the public release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report, according to a new Quinnipiac poll released Tuesday.

Eighty-four percent of respondents said the report should be made public, according to the survey, with only 9 percent saying it should not. Among Republicans, the divide was slightly smaller, but still stark, with 75 percent supporting release of the report and 17 percent opposing it.

[...]
Releasing and analyzing the report will only cause more second guessing. If Mueller couldn't find enough evidence then no one can.
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
User avatar
defixione
Contributor
Posts: 2841
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:42 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by defixione »

Not if Barr is honest and neutral in his assertion. Mueller never said that, Barr, the store bought AG, did. You're not interested in seeing it first hand?
dolomite
Contributor
Posts: 1897
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:26 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by dolomite »

defixione wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2019 12:31 pm Not if Barr is honest and neutral in his assertion. Mueller never said that, Barr, the store bought AG, did. You're not interested in seeing it first hand?
Sure, why not.
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
dolomite
Contributor
Posts: 1897
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:26 am

Re: Here we go....

Post by dolomite »

A voice of reason: Gabbard, who lags in 2020 polls behind better-known rivals, said in a video posted to her Twitter account that “now that Mueller has reported that his investigation revealed no such collusion, we all need to put aside our partisan interests and recognize that finding that the president of the United States did not conspire with Russia to interfere with our elections is a good thing for our country.”
https://news.yahoo.com/tulsi-gabbard-ca ... 18063.html
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
Post Reply