I agree with most of this. That's why the scientific process should have been allowed throughout covid, because it was new.Shirley wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 6:32 pm I forgot how nice it was not to have you two pro-insurrectionists around here today.
And as far as the scientists changing their opinions and recommendations, Randy...
Could you reveal your ignorance any more blatantly? It was called the "Novel" Corona Virus for a reason, because nobody had seen this iteration of it before. It was NEW. Medicine is always, always, ALWAYS, even after a disease or condition has been known for 50 or 100, or 500 years, our current best guess, because that's what science is, you pitiful moron.
Here's a Pro tip for you: Scientists will still be changing their opinions about the Covid-19 virus 100 years from now as they continue to learn more about it. When they do, will that be yet another reason for you to take yet another victory lap, dumbass?
If you weren't so ignorant on the subject, if you knew enough to realize how little you know, you'd shut your stupid mouth, and stop embarrassing yourself.
But you don't, so you won't. Instead, you'll keep spreading your ignorant opinions on the subject around here, like the feces they are.
Instead faucci and the biden admin tried to censor and silence other scientists who had conflicting opinions and studies. Why??? That isn't the scientific way.
At one point if someone said you could have side effects from the vaccine, or you could be vaccinated and still get covid, it was flagged as misinformation and censored. Both of those things were factual