Forcing employees to work on site accomplishes nothing but shrinking the pool of talent that will consider working the job. As a person who lives in Omaha, NE (not exactly a destination location) I have seen this firsthand. When we required living in Omaha to be a developer on our team, our pool of talent that even applied for openings was MUCH smaller than now, when you can do the job from anywhere in the world.JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 2:05 pmI wasn’t trying to imply a one-size fits all solution. My LinkedIn feed is inundated with people posting about the “right to work remotely,” - which I don’t think exists - and that was the basis for my comment. Considering that my taxes pay Federal workers, it is kind of my business.Overlander wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 1:57 pmNo implication.
Just a comment that you consistently seem to enjoy bitching and whining about what others do and don’t do.
Whether workers perform their duties from home or from the office has absolutely no bearing on your life…at all.
You make a comment like this because you need to be mad, you need someone to suffer, someone else to be inconvenienced.
I made my comment about YOU, because you don’t bear the responsibility of managing a large workforce, and therefore don’t have the experience to know that there isn’t a “for one-for all” answer.
And I really don’t “need” someone to be mad at. I definitely do more venting here than I should, but it is not central to my existence, believe it or not.
The people who bitch about remote workers are usually people who either cannot do their job remotely or do not have the skill set necessary to perform their jobs remotely.