Can we assume that Putin has access to this database now?Aides to Elon Musk charged with running the U.S. government human resources agency have locked career civil servants out of computer systems that contain the personal data of millions of federal employees, according to two agency officials.
Since taking office 11 days ago, President Donald Trump has embarked on a massive government makeover, firing and sidelining hundreds of civil servants in his first steps toward downsizing the bureaucracy and installing more loyalists.
Musk, the billionaire Tesla CEO and X owner tasked by Trump to slash the size of the 2.2 million-strong civilian government workforce, has moved swiftly to install allies at the agency known as the Office of Personnel Management.
The two officials, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, said some senior career employees at OPM have had their access revoked to some of the department's data systems.
The systems include a vast database called Enterprise Human Resources Integration, which contains dates of birth, Social Security numbers, appraisals, home addresses, pay grades and length of service of government workers, the officials said.
"We have no visibility into what they are doing with the computer and data systems," one of the officials said. "That is creating great concern. There is no oversight. It creates real cybersecurity and hacking implications."
Officials affected by the move can still log on and access functions such as email but can no longer see the massive datasets that cover every facet of the federal workforce.
Musk, OPM, representatives of the new team, and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
OPM has sent out memos that eschew the normal dry wording of government missives as it encourages civil servants to consider buyout offers to quit and take a vacation to a "dream destination."
Don Moynihan, a professor at the Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan, said the actions inside OPM raised concerns about congressional oversight at the agency and how Trump and Musk view the federal bureaucracy.
"This makes it much harder for anyone outside Musk's inner circle at OPM to know what's going on," Moynihan said.
A team including current and former employees of Musk assumed command of OPM on Jan. 20, the day Trump took office. They have moved sofa beds onto the fifth floor of the agency's headquarters, which contains the director's office and can only be accessed with a security badge or a security escort, one of the OPM employees said.
The sofa beds have been installed so the team can work around the clock, the employee said.
Musk, a major donor to a famously demanding boss, installed beds at X for employees to enable them to work longer when in 2022 he took over the social media platform, formerly known as Twitter.
"It feels like a hostile takeover," the employee said.
The new appointees in charge of OPM have moved the agency's chief management officer, Katie Malague, out of her office and to a new office on a different floor, the officials said.
Malague did not respond to a request for comment.
David Lebryk, the top-ranking career U.S. Treasury Department official, is set to leave his post following a clash with allies of Musk after they asked for access to payment systems, the Washington Post reported on Friday.
The new team at OPM includes software engineers and Brian Bjelde, who joined Musk's SpaceX venture in 2003 as an avionics engineer before rising to become the company's vice president of human resources. Bjelde's role at OPM is that of a senior adviser.
The acting head of OPM, Charles Ezell, has been sending memos to the entire government workforce since Trump took office, including Tuesday's offering federal employees the chance to quit with eight months pay.
"No-one here knew that the memos were coming out. We are finding out about these memos the same time as the rest of the world," one of the officials said.
Among the group that now runs OPM is Amanda Scales, a former Musk employee, who is now OPM's chief of staff. In some memos sent out on Jan. 20 and Jan. 21 by Ezell, including one directing agencies to identify federal workers on probationary periods, agency heads were asked to email Scales at her OPM email address.
are we there yet?
Re: are we there yet?
The hits keep coming! What could possibly go wrong?
Nero is an angler in the lake of darkness
Re: are we there yet?
Don’t mind me—just painting over values:
Re: are we there yet?
I will say....if there is blame for the dems...and there is. The most damning indictment i see at the moment from the left is the inexplicable lack of action by elected officials. They appear to be politely following along with orders and just saying oh shucks....what can we do? Perhaps there are some nefarious thing happening behind the scenes to ensure they don't speak up to much...I dont know. But I am surprised at the lack of resistance from the only ones who can make a difference at the highest levels.
Just Ledoux it
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 15127
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: are we there yet?
i’m torn
there’s a big part of me that thinks the ousdahls, psychos, randis, mich’s, and dodos of the country have a lesson to learn…and they NEED to learn it the hard way
there’s a big part of me that thinks the ousdahls, psychos, randis, mich’s, and dodos of the country have a lesson to learn…and they NEED to learn it the hard way
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: are we there yet?
perhaps, but not at the expense of the rest of the worldKUTradition wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 11:27 am i’m torn
there’s a big part of me that thinks the ousdahls, psychos, randis, mich’s, and dodos of the country have a lesson to learn…and they NEED to learn it the hard way
Just Ledoux it
Re: are we there yet?
Psych especially. Can't imagine online education will thrive as an impoverished subset.
Re: are we there yet?
You’re starting to see at least some of them - Schiff and Raskin in the Senate, a bigger handful (Crockett most effectively so far) in the House - speak to the gravity of the situation.
Things will need to galvanize around someone.
And it will not be anyone in the Booker/Schumer/Klobuchar set.
Things will need to galvanize around someone.
And it will not be anyone in the Booker/Schumer/Klobuchar set.
Re: are we there yet?
Bernie and AOC. Because they have guts.
Re: are we there yet?
I’m hoping and praying that Trump in 2024-26 is to the country/world what Pete Wilson 1994-96 was to California. It would then be all worth it.
Re: are we there yet?
for every action there is a gross overreaction.
that is the lesson of the new year.
that is the lesson of the new year.
Re: are we there yet?
Yep. Fish for the win
Re: are we there yet?
it's a good thing I don't need many clothes and I wear stuff until it shreds apart...because clothes are going to get more expensive too......hecho in Mexico
Just Ledoux it
Re: are we there yet?
I only buy American made.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 15127
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: are we there yet?
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: are we there yet?
it’s easy. and it’s fun.
Re: are we there yet?
I've seen and read number of Democrats coming out and speaking adamantly against what's happening.TDub wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 11:17 am I will say....if there is blame for the dems...and there is. The most damning indictment i see at the moment from the left is the inexplicable lack of action by elected officials. They appear to be politely following along with orders and just saying oh shucks....what can we do? Perhaps there are some nefarious thing happening behind the scenes to ensure they don't speak up to much...I dont know. But I am surprised at the lack of resistance from the only ones who can make a difference at the highest levels.
They just aren't getting any major coverage for it.
Re: are we there yet?
Right.jfish26 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 11:32 am You’re starting to see at least some of them - Schiff and Raskin in the Senate, a bigger handful (Crockett most effectively so far) in the House - speak to the gravity of the situation.
Things will need to galvanize around someone.
And it will not be anyone in the Booker/Schumer/Klobuchar set.
And everyone's favorite AOC ( who I've now instantly found myself liking just because she's so anti-trump-totalitarianism ) has been very active.