Dumbfuck in charge

Ugh.
seahawk
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 7:38 pm

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by seahawk »

Perhaps they believe that Tubman aided the wrong side?
Don't inject Lysol.
Deleted User 266

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 266 »

No coincidence that Jackson is one of Trump's idols?

Image
Last edited by Deleted User 266 on Fri May 24, 2019 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16592
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16592
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
Deleted User 89

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 89 »

couple of stable geni-asses right there
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16592
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
Deleted User 89

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 89 »

lmao at the snowflake-in-charge...

so fragile that the sight of one of our own battleships is too much

jfc
Deleted User 62

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 62 »

Lifted this from a Facebook post:

Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"
Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:
"A few things spring to mind.
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.
Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.
I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.
But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.
Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.
And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.
There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.
Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.
He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.
And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.
So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.
This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.
He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.
And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:
'My God… what… have… I… created?
If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16592
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Shirley »

There are innumerable gems in that post, too many to cite them all.

...And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down...
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
Deleted User 89

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 89 »

‘murica
Deleted User 266

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 266 »

Image
Deleted User 266

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 266 »

Image

Image
Deleted User 266

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 266 »

Image
Deleted User 266

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 266 »

Image
Deleted User 89

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 89 »

Paul1 wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:58 am Image
winner
Deleted User 266

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 266 »

Image
Deleted User 266

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 266 »

Deleted User 266

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 266 »

Image
Deleted User 266

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 266 »

Deleted User 266

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 266 »

If Trump were to see this is there any doubt he would insult the Toronto fans?

"
Post Reply