who ya got?

Ugh.
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Mjl »

He'll be the main target at the next debate, will be interesting to see how he handles it.
Deleted User 289

Re: who ya got?

Post by Deleted User 289 »

At times probably like this.....

Image

Image


Other times like this.....

Image

Image
Deleted User 289

Re: who ya got?

Post by Deleted User 289 »

When you are projected to struggle getting African American votes you have to search elsewhere.

User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21064
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by twocoach »

lobster wrote: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:51 pm Pete will never be accepted by the left. He's a successful white male.
That's dumb even for you.
User avatar
MICHHAWK
Posts: 6090
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:01 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by MICHHAWK »

Mayor Pete should hunt for votes elsewhere. Guessing the Sikh population in the US is not high. Guessing 99% of the non Sikh population here in the US does not know what a Sikh is or what they do or where the come/came from.

Maybe mayor Pete should pimp himself out to the Gremlin drivers club of America. Be one of two or three votes for him there.
seahawk
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 7:38 pm

Re: who ya got?

Post by seahawk »

The Florida Democratic Party is often mostly a circular firing squad of the highest order, but the one thing they got right was in 2008 trying to move their primary to first in the nation. It's ridiculous that such unrepresentative states as Iowa and New Hampshire have such a strong role in determining the outcome of the primaries.

ETA: Which is not to say anything negative about Buttigegg, just listening to the endless pundit talk about Iowa is craziness.
Don't inject Lysol.
User avatar
zsn
Contributor
Posts: 3808
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

Re: who ya got?

Post by zsn »

MICHHAWK wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:23 am Mayor Pete should hunt for votes elsewhere. Guessing the Sikh population in the US is not high. Guessing 99% of the non Sikh population here in the US does not know what a Sikh is or what they do or where the come/came from.
What a sad commentary on the intelligence and knowledge of the US voting age public (I doubt that the number is as high as 99%, but probably still very high - I nevertheless agree with your broader point). Explains why Sikh shopkeepers were confused for being Muslim and were targets of assault after 9/11 by mobs-who-couldn't-hate-correctly! Also explains why we have some of the elected officials that we do!!
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Mjl »

Supporting minority groups in general is a good strategy - it gains trust from other minority groups. I mentioned it in another thread as to one of the reasons why Jews still tend to be Democrats despite Republicans pandering to them and being stronger on Israel support.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Mjl »

It's almost like someone has been on here saying that Pete's the real front-runner...

After Iowa and New Hampshire it'll come down to whether or not African Americans will vote for a homosexual. I think I agree with Pete that that is overblown by the analysts... But, who knows.
Deleted User 289

Re: who ya got?

Post by Deleted User 289 »

75% of those polled prefer someone other than Pete.
84% prefer someone other than Liz.
85% prefer someone other than Joe.
85% prefer someone other than Bernie.
You get the picture. Am I the only one concerned it's not a pretty one?
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Shirley »

Well, she had to do something:

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
MICHHAWK
Posts: 6090
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:01 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by MICHHAWK »

robo feral has been meddling in the election since way before today.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18672
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by jfish26 »

It would be insanely stupid for the DNC to hold a debate tonight.
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by DCHawk1 »

jfish26 wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:18 am It would be insanely stupid for the DNC to hold a debate tonight.
Which is, of course, why they will do so.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Deleted User 89

Re: who ya got?

Post by Deleted User 89 »

DCHawk1 wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:19 am
jfish26 wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:18 am It would be insanely stupid for the DNC to hold a debate tonight.
Which is, of course, why they will do so.
too easy to just let it proceed

in actuality, it would probably further their cause by underscoring the gravity of the situation
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18672
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by jfish26 »

DCHawk1 wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:19 am
jfish26 wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:18 am It would be insanely stupid for the DNC to hold a debate tonight.
Which is, of course, why they will do so.
Sure. But the smart play is to sit back and let this have all the oxygen. Shit, issue some joint statement that injects more gasoline.

But, Jesus, the last thing they should do is draw attention away from reasons Trump should go, and toward what's bad about each candidate (which is, cumulatively and essentially, the only argument for why Trump should stay).
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by DCHawk1 »

jfish26 wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:25 am
DCHawk1 wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:19 am
jfish26 wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:18 am It would be insanely stupid for the DNC to hold a debate tonight.
Which is, of course, why they will do so.
Sure. But the smart play is to sit back and let this have all the oxygen. Shit, issue some joint statement that injects more gasoline.

But, Jesus, the last thing they should do is draw attention away from reasons Trump should go, and toward what's bad about each candidate (which is, cumulatively and essentially, the only argument for why Trump should stay).
You'll get no argument from me.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Post Reply