Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Ugh.
User avatar
MICHHAWK
Posts: 6095
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:01 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by MICHHAWK »

Agreed squared. The federal gov’t and dc is where all the principled people go to practice their craft.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16587
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16587
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Shirley »





"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16587
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Shirley »



"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16587
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16587
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Shirley »











"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21079
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by twocoach »

You could tell from Hill's opening statement that she was going to eviscerate anyone who fucked with her. Glad to hear that some of these clowns are being taken to the woodshed.
Deleted User 89

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Deleted User 89 »

my new favorite doctor
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16587
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17473
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by jhawks99 »

Feral wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 6:02 pm
He didn't mean it
Defense. Rebounds.
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by DCHawk1 »

A. lulz at Max Boot
B. double lulz at Max Boot Tweeting John Harwood.
C. Oh. Hi.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/21/politics ... index.html
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Mjl »

I am curious if you took a poll, in how many states would a majority say that even if Trump with 100% certainty withheld foreign aid for personal gain, that he should be removed from office?

I'd guess it's around 20, maybe more. Which means there is basically no chance of the Senate convicting him.
User avatar
defixione
Contributor
Posts: 2841
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:42 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by defixione »

DCHawk1 wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:46 pm A. lulz at Max Boot
B. double lulz at Max Boot Tweeting John Harwood.
C. Oh. Hi.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/21/politics ... index.html
So Barr and Horowitz planted some evidence and hired a fall guy?
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by DCHawk1 »

Easy, there, Sparko.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by DCHawk1 »

Also, weird how there's no mention in this thread about Hill's demolition of the Steele Dossier and the dumbshits who believed it.

I mean...really weird.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
Geezer
Posts: 3474
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:23 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Geezer »

Is there anything that this administration could do that you wouldn't attempt to rationalize?
Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Deleted User 62

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Deleted User 62 »

It's a GOP specific virus.
User avatar
Geezer
Posts: 3474
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:23 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Geezer »

DC has the arrogant part right.
Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by DCHawk1 »

Geezer wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 10:10 pm Is there anything that this administration could do that you wouldn't attempt to rationalize?
Link?
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?

Post by Mjl »

DCHawk1 wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:44 pm Also, weird how there's no mention in this thread about Hill's demolition of the Steele Dossier and the dumbshits who believed it.

I mean...really weird.
Not really. It's like Holmes' answer when being questioned by Jim Jordan about why his initial mention of the call wasn't that memorable to Taylor - it's because it's so obvious
Post Reply