^^^^
Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
I read Laurenson's thread on Twitter last night.
WTAF?
WTAF?
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
Anybody know what that protestor was shouting as police escorted him out of the hearing?
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
He was merely pointing out that none of the democrats has thought for a second to reflect on why it was perfectly normal, i.e., perfect, for Trump to enlist the help of Putin in 2016 and Zelensky in 2020, to help him win the election.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
If only one of Trump's personal attorneys, Rudy or William Barr, were presenting the minority's case to the Judiciary Committee.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
He was proclaiming Trumps innocence mainly. I noticed Adler's smirk as the protester was escorted out.
smh, very entertaining.
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
I listened for a couple of minutes while getting lunch. Little kids throwing caturds at each other in the sandbox.
Defense. Rebounds.
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
Hey! look what the cat barfed up!
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
Everyone knew there were people like Trump amongst us, we just never imagined that the republican party was so devoid of principles that they would ardently enable them.
AG Barr and Durham instantly leaping to Trump's defense and bastardizing our DOJ into a public relations arm of the Trump Administration immediately after the IG report, which reveals all their "spying" and "witch hunt" conspiracy propaganda bullshit was nothing but lies.
smfh.
AG Barr and Durham instantly leaping to Trump's defense and bastardizing our DOJ into a public relations arm of the Trump Administration immediately after the IG report, which reveals all their "spying" and "witch hunt" conspiracy propaganda bullshit was nothing but lies.
smfh.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
What's the over/under that Trump will fire the FBI Director today? After all, Lavrov's coming to town:
Because, wtaf!?
Is it just me, or is it reasonable to assume that "tough on communism" republicans would be apoplectic, if Obama or another democrat were doing something like this?
President Trump told two senior Russian officials in a 2017 Oval Office meeting that he was unconcerned about Moscow’s interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election because the United States did the same in other countries, an assertion that prompted alarmed White House officials to limit access to the remarks to an unusually small number of people, according to three former officials with knowledge of the matter.
The comments, which have not been previously reported, were part of a now-infamous meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, in which Trump revealed highly classified information that exposed a source of intelligence on the Islamic State. He also said during the meeting that firing FBI Director James B. Comey the previous day had relieved “great pressure” on him...[/url]
Because, wtaf!?
Is it just me, or is it reasonable to assume that "tough on communism" republicans would be apoplectic, if Obama or another democrat were doing something like this?
President Trump told two senior Russian officials in a 2017 Oval Office meeting that he was unconcerned about Moscow’s interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election because the United States did the same in other countries, an assertion that prompted alarmed White House officials to limit access to the remarks to an unusually small number of people, according to three former officials with knowledge of the matter.
The comments, which have not been previously reported, were part of a now-infamous meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, in which Trump revealed highly classified information that exposed a source of intelligence on the Islamic State. He also said during the meeting that firing FBI Director James B. Comey the previous day had relieved “great pressure” on him...[/url]
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
Lavrov is coming to town for the same reason he met with Trump earlier: Putin wants to know if Trump is as genuinely unhinged as he seems like from his recent discussions about light bulbs and toilets might indicate.
Don't inject Lysol.
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
Speaking of "republican enablers":
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
Do I lulz?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... peachment/
Or do I lulz?
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/1 ... ent-080311
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... peachment/
Or do I lulz?
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/1 ... ent-080311
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
It would be unreasonable to think that everyone would be on the exact same page and it would be absurd for all involved to not float out there all possible options to discuss the merits. This is a very serious matter and honestly, I would be disappointed if all options weren't discussed.DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:30 pm Do I lulz?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... peachment/
Or do I lulz?
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/1 ... ent-080311
Re: Where TF is the Impeachment Inquiry Thread?
Laughing at the only impediment to Trump being even more lawless?DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:30 pm Do I lulz?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... peachment/
Or do I lulz?
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/1 ... ent-080311
Of course, makes sense.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit