Today in "so much winning"!
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Take it to the: "There's Absolutely Positively No Fvcking Way You Can Make This Shit Up! Thanks, republicans", thread!Geezer wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 7:04 am Sinks, uh, showers, all of this stuff, I did a lot of it. No water comes out. You have areas where there’s so much water you don’t know what to do with it. You turn on the shower, you’re not allowed to have any water anymore. I mean, we do a lot of it. Uh, dishwashers. You did the dishwasher, right? You press it. Remember the dishwasher, you press it? Boom, there’d be like an explosion, five minutes later, you open it, the steam pours out, the dishes. Now you press it 12 times. Women tell me. Again. You know, they give you four drops of water. And they’re in places where there’s so much water they don’t know what to do with it. So we just came out with a reg on dishwashers. We’re going back to you.
... Now we’re doing it with a lot of other things. Uh, dishwashers, and uh, you know. I won’t tell you one of the things because every time I tell you they do a big number on it. You know the one I’m talking about, right? Sinks, right? Showers? And what goes with a sink and a shower?
[Crowd chants, “A toilet!”]
Ten times, right? Ten times. [Trump does flushing motion while saying something that sounds like ‘bah, bop.’] Not me of course, not me, but you. You. But I never mention that. Because one time I mentioned all three. I said, sinks, showers, and toilets. The headline was, ‘Trump with the toilets, toilets.’ That’s all they want. They don’t even mention the, so I didn’t mention that, okay? I go off the record.
But you know what, it’s terrible. You wanna wash your hands, you turn on the sink, no water comes out. So you leave the water, go ten times as long, it’s same thing. You have a shower. Drip. It’s no good for me, for me.
You know, the one thing that came out really good about being in this business, they used to say I wore a hairpiece...
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
There's some fascinating data at the linked site.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Tired of all the winning yet?
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Sounds like a horrible person. Why would Iran promote him? Hmmm.
Just Ledoux it
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Thanks for the demonstration of why we're talking about Iran instead of about the demented one musing about flushing the toilet and running water.
Don't inject Lysol.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
They have a long line of equally repugnant characters so killing QS seems to have accomplished nothing but provoke the crazies. Awesome.
Thank goodness the Trump administration has a solid plan in place to handle the backlash...
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Are you talking about his Heinz 57 approach?
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
So, we shouldnt eliminate evil people because they are going to be replaced by more evil people? So we should just let them be crazy and kill freely?
So, why did we kill Bin Laden? Or any other number of examples.
Just Ledoux it
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Cuz a democrat wuz president then. Pay attention!TDub wrote: ↑Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:45 amSo, we shouldnt eliminate evil people because they are going to be replaced by more evil people? So we should just let them be crazy and kill freely?
So, why did we kill Bin Laden?
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Well since it's how OK to drone strike anyone who has or might do something evil against US citizens, will US Intelligence be monitoring 8chan chat rooms and preemptively murdering via drone strike the next person who announces their plans there for a mass shooting?
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Hey! The goal posts used to be over here. Where'd they go?
Just Ledoux it
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Just going with your theme of overly dramatic what-if spiraling nonsense.
Last edited by twocoach on Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Anwar al-Awlaki says hi.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Jan 06, 2020 2:06 pm Well since it's how OK to drone strike anyone who has or might do something evil against US citizens, will US Intelligence be monitoring 8chan chat rooms and preemptively murdering via drone strike the next person who announces their plans there for a mass shooting?
Or he would, if he could.
Additionally, I won't assign the entirety of The City of God, but you could bother to read a little bit about the ideas about justice and war that were so much a part of Western culture by the 5th century that a guy from North Africa felt comfortable writing them down.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Today in "so much winning"!
Is this what you mean by "Heinz 57"? Because I said these folks were more incompetent than the Bushies, but I think that was maybe understated by about 1000%.defixione wrote: ↑Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:47 amAre you talking about his Heinz 57 approach?
Don't inject Lysol.