I know you don't need to be told this, but: there are a lot of people out there with comprehension and discernment skills of children. Telling a sufficient number of people, over and over and over again, that certain groups are dangerous and the "enemy of the people" will result in things like this.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 1:42 pm. . . and that equates to planting bombs around peoples' homes and offices how, exactly? I mean, to anyone older than about ten?Gutter wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 1:31 pm “It’s okay to disagree in politics,” she said, “but it’s never okay to take action against another individual.”
She speaks for herself, the country, or the President?
The Donald has proven he doesn't believe that to be true.
“Any guy who can do a body slam, he is my type!”
Told audience members he would pay their legal fees if they engaged in violence against protesters at one of his (KKK?) rallies.
"If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them, would you? Seriously, OK? Just knock the hell ... I promise you I will pay for the legal fees. I promise, I promise,"
A different time, "He's walking out with big high-fives, smiling, laughing," Trump said. "I'd like to punch him in the face, I'll tell you."
"When you see these thugs being thrown into the back of a paddy wagon, you just seen them thrown in, rough. I said, 'Please don’t be too nice,'"
Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
- HouseDivided
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:24 pm
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
Taxi Driver caused John Hinkley to try to assassinate President Reagan. Was that Robert DeNiro's fault?jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 1:46 pmI know you don't need to be told this, but: there are a lot of people out there with comprehension and discernment skills of children. Telling a sufficient number of people, over and over and over again, that certain groups are dangerous and the "enemy of the people" will result in things like this.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 1:42 pm. . . and that equates to planting bombs around peoples' homes and offices how, exactly? I mean, to anyone older than about ten?Gutter wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 1:31 pm “It’s okay to disagree in politics,” she said, “but it’s never okay to take action against another individual.”
She speaks for herself, the country, or the President?
The Donald has proven he doesn't believe that to be true.
“Any guy who can do a body slam, he is my type!”
Told audience members he would pay their legal fees if they engaged in violence against protesters at one of his (KKK?) rallies.
"If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them, would you? Seriously, OK? Just knock the hell ... I promise you I will pay for the legal fees. I promise, I promise,"
A different time, "He's walking out with big high-fives, smiling, laughing," Trump said. "I'd like to punch him in the face, I'll tell you."
"When you see these thugs being thrown into the back of a paddy wagon, you just seen them thrown in, rough. I said, 'Please don’t be too nice,'"
“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” - Mark Twain
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
A fictional movie versus an actual national politician who incites his followers to violence, over and over.
Strange kind of whataboutism.
Strange kind of whataboutism.
Don't inject Lysol.
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
HD - Sorry! I didn't know we were playing the "equates" game.
My response was to what Sanders said - It’s okay to disagree in politics,” “but it’s never okay to take action against another individual.” Didn't know she was differentiating between bombs and any and every other type of "action".
HOLD ON!!!!! (Your guy?) President Fucknuts said today,
"We have to come together and send one very clear, strong, unmistakable message that acts or threats of political violence OF ANY KIND have no place in the United States of America".
I guess a man running for President and then who becomes President is exempt from his own exact words because.............
My response was to what Sanders said - It’s okay to disagree in politics,” “but it’s never okay to take action against another individual.” Didn't know she was differentiating between bombs and any and every other type of "action".
HOLD ON!!!!! (Your guy?) President Fucknuts said today,
"We have to come together and send one very clear, strong, unmistakable message that acts or threats of political violence OF ANY KIND have no place in the United States of America".
I guess a man running for President and then who becomes President is exempt from his own exact words because.............
- HouseDivided
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:24 pm
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
If you can't see the difference between rhetoric and the actual crafting, arming, and sending of bombs, then there's not much else I can say to help you understand.Gutter wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:26 pm HD - Sorry! I didn't know we were playing the "equates" game.
My response was to what Sanders said - It’s okay to disagree in politics,” “but it’s never okay to take action against another individual.” Didn't know she was differentiating between bombs and any and every other type of "action".
HOLD ON!!!!! (Your guy?) President Fucknuts said today,
"We have to come together and send one very clear, strong, unmistakable message that acts or threats of political violence OF ANY KIND have no place in the United States of America".
I guess a man running for President and then who becomes President is exempt from his own exact words because.............
“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” - Mark Twain
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
Don't inject Lysol.
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
Soros multi-tasking. Caravan moving too slow so he had to send phony bombs.
Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
Interesting to see who will be apprehended for the bombs. Is this an angry (insane) person(s) who just wants to sow discord before the mid-terms? Russians? Republicans? Democrats? The FBI has plenty of past serial bombers to interview:
https://www.npr.org/2018/03/21/59522557 ... al-bombers
https://www.npr.org/2018/03/21/59522557 ... al-bombers
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
It is NOT standard operating procedure to send out a press secretary to condemn attempted bombings of a previous President, a previous Secretary of State and Senator and First Lady, a sitting Senator, and a Congresswoman. His belated comments this afternoon, off a teleprompter, are a joke.
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
But Trump speaks his mind, Fish. That's what makes him so great!jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 1:46 pmI know you don't need to be told this, but: there are a lot of people out there with comprehension and discernment skills of children. Telling a sufficient number of people, over and over and over again, that certain groups are dangerous and the "enemy of the people" will result in things like this.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 1:42 pm. . . and that equates to planting bombs around peoples' homes and offices how, exactly? I mean, to anyone older than about ten?Gutter wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 1:31 pm “It’s okay to disagree in politics,” she said, “but it’s never okay to take action against another individual.”
She speaks for herself, the country, or the President?
The Donald has proven he doesn't believe that to be true.
“Any guy who can do a body slam, he is my type!”
Told audience members he would pay their legal fees if they engaged in violence against protesters at one of his (KKK?) rallies.
"If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them, would you? Seriously, OK? Just knock the hell ... I promise you I will pay for the legal fees. I promise, I promise,"
A different time, "He's walking out with big high-fives, smiling, laughing," Trump said. "I'd like to punch him in the face, I'll tell you."
"When you see these thugs being thrown into the back of a paddy wagon, you just seen them thrown in, rough. I said, 'Please don’t be too nice,'"
- HouseDivided
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:24 pm
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
Since this is a first, what is the SOP, then? A direct link to the text would be appreciated.Leawood wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 4:21 pm It is NOT standard operating procedure to send out a press secretary to condemn attempted bombings of a previous President, a previous Secretary of State and Senator and First Lady, a sitting Senator, and a Congresswoman. His belated comments this afternoon, off a teleprompter, are a joke.
“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” - Mark Twain
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
JFCHouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 5:23 pmSince this is a first, what is the SOP, then? A direct link to the text would be appreciated.Leawood wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 4:21 pm It is NOT standard operating procedure to send out a press secretary to condemn attempted bombings of a previous President, a previous Secretary of State and Senator and First Lady, a sitting Senator, and a Congresswoman. His belated comments this afternoon, off a teleprompter, are a joke.
- HouseDivided
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:24 pm
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
Hmmmm.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 6:11 pmJFCHouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 5:23 pmSince this is a first, what is the SOP, then? A direct link to the text would be appreciated.Leawood wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 4:21 pm It is NOT standard operating procedure to send out a press secretary to condemn attempted bombings of a previous President, a previous Secretary of State and Senator and First Lady, a sitting Senator, and a Congresswoman. His belated comments this afternoon, off a teleprompter, are a joke.
There either is or is not an SOP to be followed here. Leawood’s post seems to indicate that the President has failed to adhere to said policy, and I am seeking clarification.
Unless, of course, it is just a matter of opinion or preference, that is . . .
“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” - Mark Twain
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
So, President(?) Trump should just sit this one out?
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
Tell us what you believe the Donald should say.
Originally Imzcount (Why do politicians think “hope” is a plan ?)
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
“Avoid the foolish notion of hope. Hope is the surrender of authority to your fate and trusting it to the whims of the wind”.
Taylor Sheridan
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
I can see the difference.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:37 pmIf you can't see the difference between rhetoric and the actual crafting, arming, and sending of bombs, then there's not much else I can say to help you understand.Gutter wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:26 pm HD - Sorry! I didn't know we were playing the "equates" game.
My response was to what Sanders said - It’s okay to disagree in politics,” “but it’s never okay to take action against another individual.” Didn't know she was differentiating between bombs and any and every other type of "action".
HOLD ON!!!!! (Your guy?) President Fucknuts said today,
"We have to come together and send one very clear, strong, unmistakable message that acts or threats of political violence OF ANY KIND have no place in the United States of America".
I guess a man running for President and then who becomes President is exempt from his own exact words because.............
I can also see and am currently seeing (watching on TV) a guy (John Brennan) who is a whole shit ton more intelligent than I am (and my guess is somewhat more intelligent than you) in terms of what the heck happened today (and has been happening) and coincidently he hit on EXACTLY what I said.
The fuckwad who is our President has had rhetoric that incites violence.
I don't give a fuck if it's bombs, beating someone up, or whatever degree it may be, that he is "inciting".
I just give a damn that he incites it and the putz is too fucking clueless (or thinks others are) to realize he has done exactly what he is telling others not to do and has "no place in the United States of America". It makes me want to puke that I live in a country where there are so many asshhats who get off on him being our President.
- HouseDivided
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:24 pm
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
He didn’t, as was established above. An official statement was released, as was a tweet, as was a public statement this afternoon.
Admittedly, he did fail to burst into tears, rend his garments, put on sackcloth, or sit in an ash heap, but he didn’t say out loud what most of us were thinking, namely “Why do pipe bombs never work like they’re supposed to?!?”
“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” - Mark Twain
- HouseDivided
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:24 pm
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
John Brennan the Obama lapdog? Yeah, completely unbiased. Lulz.Gutter wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 6:27 pmI can see the difference.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:37 pmIf you can't see the difference between rhetoric and the actual crafting, arming, and sending of bombs, then there's not much else I can say to help you understand.Gutter wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:26 pm HD - Sorry! I didn't know we were playing the "equates" game.
My response was to what Sanders said - It’s okay to disagree in politics,” “but it’s never okay to take action against another individual.” Didn't know she was differentiating between bombs and any and every other type of "action".
HOLD ON!!!!! (Your guy?) President Fucknuts said today,
"We have to come together and send one very clear, strong, unmistakable message that acts or threats of political violence OF ANY KIND have no place in the United States of America".
I guess a man running for President and then who becomes President is exempt from his own exact words because.............
I can also see and am currently seeing (watching on TV) a guy (John Brennan) who is a whole shit ton more intelligent than I am (and my guess is somewhat more intelligent than you) in terms of what the heck happened today (and has been happening) and coincidently he hit on EXACTLY what I said.
The fuckwad who is our President has had rhetoric that incites violence.
I don't give a fuck if it's bombs, beating someone up, or whatever degree it may be, that he is "inciting".
I just give a damn that he incites it and the putz is too fucking clueless (or thinks others are) to realize he has done exactly what he is telling others not to do and has "no place in the United States of America". It makes me want to puke that I live in a country where there are so many asshhats who get off on him being our President.
“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” - Mark Twain
Re: Bombs sent to CNN and the Clintons
HD - Yes, that John Brennan. The guy who worked for the CIA under multiple Presidents. Biased or not, he was one of those who was sent a bomb. I think he has a right to state his opinion and facts. I stated facts in my posts. He alluded to those facts. These were actual things Trump said and did. FACT.
You're going to dispute that he hasn't/didn't incite violence? Ok.
Hey, for all I know the "packages" are some huge democratic ruse. According to some/many on the "right", of course it is. More division. Perfect. God Bless America. MAGA? More like make America a bigger divided shithole than it's ever been. Love thy neighbor - unless thy neighbor has different political beliefs. Then KILL thy neighbor. Fanfreakingtastic!
You're going to dispute that he hasn't/didn't incite violence? Ok.
Hey, for all I know the "packages" are some huge democratic ruse. According to some/many on the "right", of course it is. More division. Perfect. God Bless America. MAGA? More like make America a bigger divided shithole than it's ever been. Love thy neighbor - unless thy neighbor has different political beliefs. Then KILL thy neighbor. Fanfreakingtastic!