seahawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:24 am Read some interesting theorizing by an American who lives in Europe, who wondered if someone inside Iran wanted Soleimani gone, by sending him out of home territory where he would be untouchable, onto foreign soil. In some Iranian rival's eyes, would that make it easier for things like removing sanctions, getting rid of the gung-ho guy who was known for killing? Noted that it would have been easy for us to get the message to Soleimani to take the next plane home, where he would be untouchable, unlike being on foreign soil in Iraq.
But the bait offered to Trump was too tempting not to take, as those back in Iran would have known it would be.
Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
Just keep repeating "no matter how hard I try, I am still not DC."IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:33 pmSo it's only OK when you do it about republicans?twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:31 pmAh, the infamous "they".IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:12 pm Even aside from the Iran shit, daily hoping for disaster or for the economy to dip so they can come say "told you so".
Their hate for trump causes them to hope for bad stuff so they can blame trump.
We're talking about a specific group of YOU guys around here....so yes, "they" is an appropriate term to use.
Who goes to AFH and sits on their phone on a message board all day? You probably left with 2min to go too you POS.
They have these things called TV timeouts. And even after getting up at 6am to get out of town and drive through the snow to get to Lawrence, I stayed until the end as I always do.
Last edited by twocoach on Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
What?twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:36 pmSo should we kill all white gun owners who participate on 8chan and say "what about all the sons and daughters lives who were saved because one of these guys might commit a mass shooting at some point"?IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 11:22 am What about the sons and daughters lives who were saved by eliminating a dangerous threat who hates the United States and has been the brains of operations that facilitated the deaths of countless Americans? Those lives already lost and hypothetical (likely) future deaths matter also.
The fact that the Iranians (and other enemies) will respond to our actions doesn't mean we can never take action.
Iran is fully capable of not shooting down commercial airplanes. This isn't on the United States at all.
Preemptive murder is not OK unless there is a true threat of an imminent threat. If Trump had true evidence of that, he would have shared it in the briefings with Congress.
He didnt even mention a threat to our embassy (or is it 4?) in those briefings.
You just implied Soleimani had only thought about killing Americans and never actually done anything yet. JFC.
It gets weirder and weirder from the lefties.
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
Great post.twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:37 pmJust keep repeating "no matter how hard I try, I am still not DC."IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:33 pmSo it's only OK when you do it about republicans?
We're talking about a specific group of YOU guys around here....so yes, "they" is an appropriate term to use.
Who goes to AFH and sits on their phone on a message board all day? You probably left with 2min to go too you POS.
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
seahawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:49 amTrump is a Putin asset. The question might be what does Putin gain out of this? Having spent a good deal of my life living in oil states, I always look to where the Oil $$$ will flow. Does this mean an immediate hike in oil prices that eases Putin's economy?
Also, there've been demonstrations against the Iranian government, the people getting a little touchy. We know that Putin, from his early background in Germany, has a great fear of mobs and rowdy crowds of the citizenry. What could be better than to unite the Iranian people against a great foe?
And we know that Donald does whatever Putin says.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
Do you have to pay DC royalties for using all his stuff?IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:39 pmGreat post.twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:37 pmJust keep repeating "no matter how hard I try, I am still not DC."IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:33 pm
So it's only OK when you do it about republicans?
We're talking about a specific group of YOU guys around here....so yes, "they" is an appropriate term to use.
Who goes to AFH and sits on their phone on a message board all day? You probably left with 2min to go too you POS.
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
Pretty sure he says
Good job. Good post.
But keep trying.
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
Credit where it's due: that's my friend Japhy's line.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:42 pmPretty sure he says
Good job. Good post.
But keep trying.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
I'm bored, but I didn't even begin to scratch the surface.
Trump is one helluva ugly MFer, but the response to him is so emotive that it has turned many of the posters here into versions of him.
Trump is one helluva ugly MFer, but the response to him is so emotive that it has turned many of the posters here into versions of him.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:36 pmSo should we kill all white gun owners who participate on 8chan and say "what about all the sons and daughters lives who were saved because one of these guys might commit a mass shooting at some point"?IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 11:22 am What about the sons and daughters lives who were saved by eliminating a dangerous threat who hates the United States and has been the brains of operations that facilitated the deaths of countless Americans? Those lives already lost and hypothetical (likely) future deaths matter also.
The fact that the Iranians (and other enemies) will respond to our actions doesn't mean we can never take action.
Iran is fully capable of not shooting down commercial airplanes. This isn't on the United States at all.
Preemptive murder is not OK unless there is a true threat of an imminent threat. If Trump had true evidence of that, he would have shared it in the briefings with Congress.
He didnt even mention a threat to our embassy (or is it 4?) in those briefings.
This is one of the strangest posts ive seen in a while.
Just Ledoux it
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
Wow, that's quite a hissy fit, DC, Mr. Keyboard Warrior Extraordinare. Watching you pretend your usual superiority when it comes to something you know nothing about, the military, is certainly entertaining.
Don't inject Lysol.
Re: Iraqi militiamen breach U.S. embassy
If it's now OK to murder people (along with a little collateral damage) because we know they might do bad things to someone in the future then where do you draw the line? (Besides just being foreign and scary?)TDub wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:06 pmtwocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:36 pmSo should we kill all white gun owners who participate on 8chan and say "what about all the sons and daughters lives who were saved because one of these guys might commit a mass shooting at some point"?IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2020 11:22 am What about the sons and daughters lives who were saved by eliminating a dangerous threat who hates the United States and has been the brains of operations that facilitated the deaths of countless Americans? Those lives already lost and hypothetical (likely) future deaths matter also.
The fact that the Iranians (and other enemies) will respond to our actions doesn't mean we can never take action.
Iran is fully capable of not shooting down commercial airplanes. This isn't on the United States at all.
Preemptive murder is not OK unless there is a true threat of an imminent threat. If Trump had true evidence of that, he would have shared it in the briefings with Congress.
He didnt even mention a threat to our embassy (or is it 4?) in those briefings.
This is one of the strangest posts ive seen in a while.