You sure he isn't working to get on the ticket with Trump in the fall?
Down Ballot: Who You Got?
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
Don't inject Lysol.
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
I hadn't considered that, but now that he's becoming known as a habitual liar, too, it seems like a marriage made in evangelical "Christian" heaven.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/13/entertai ... index.html
Not sure where to put this. But this is certainly what we need.....
Not sure where to put this. But this is certainly what we need.....
Just Ledoux it
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
Haha....she's a national treasure. Okuurt?TDub wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2020 8:34 am https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/13/entertai ... index.html
Not sure where to put this. But this is certainly what we need.....
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
It's OK to ask a leader from another country to help investigate a politician as long as there is reasonable suspicion. The fact Biden is running for president doesn't mean he can't be investigated by anyone. Now, whether the suspicion is justified I honestly have no idea. I have my doubts, like with almost everything that Trump does.
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
Just curious, does withholding U.S. taxpayer's money in the form of aid appropriated by congress to pressure, i.e., extort*, the leader of "another country", figure into your opinion? Or does the fact that Trump was using our tax dollars for his own personal benefit, and not for America's benefit, not matter?IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:24 am It's OK to ask a leader from another country to help investigate a politician as long as there is reasonable suspicion. The fact Biden is running for president doesn't mean he can't be investigated by anyone. Now, whether the suspicion is justified I honestly have no idea. I have my doubts, like with almost everything that Trump does.
*Extort: obtain (something) by force, threats, or other unfair means:
force, obtain by force, obtain by threat(s), blackmail someone for, extract, exact, coerce, wring, wrest, screw, squeeze, milk, worm something out of someone; North American & Australian informal put the bite on someone for
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Frank Wilhoit
Frank Wilhoit
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
Damn feral, you’re really putting the bite on illy for this one!
And illy, once you’re done answering homegirl, would you mind offering a response to the question of precedent?
That is, if Trump’s actions regarding the Ukraine are tolerated, what precedent does that set for foreign policy? What if other countries start thinking their aid is contingent upon a favor? or, that a favor might even gain them aid they otherwise weren’t expecting, or that congress didn’t approve?
And illy, once you’re done answering homegirl, would you mind offering a response to the question of precedent?
That is, if Trump’s actions regarding the Ukraine are tolerated, what precedent does that set for foreign policy? What if other countries start thinking their aid is contingent upon a favor? or, that a favor might even gain them aid they otherwise weren’t expecting, or that congress didn’t approve?
- HouseDivided
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:24 pm
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
Stop asking questions and just accept that President Trump is evil, that everything he does is nefarious and malicious, destructive and underhanded. You know, become a Democrat.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:24 am It's OK to ask a leader from another country to help investigate a politician as long as there is reasonable suspicion. The fact Biden is running for president doesn't mean he can't be investigated by anyone. Now, whether the suspicion is justified I honestly have no idea. I have my doubts, like with almost everything that Trump does.
“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” - Mark Twain
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
Do you think that was an appropriate action by the President?
Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
No, it isn't.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:24 am It's OK to ask a leader from another country to help investigate a politician as long as there is reasonable suspicion.
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
Not bad advice.HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:01 amStop asking questions and just accept that President Trump is evil, that everything he does is nefarious and malicious, destructive and underhanded.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:24 am It's OK to ask a leader from another country to help investigate a politician as long as there is reasonable suspicion. The fact Biden is running for president doesn't mean he can't be investigated by anyone. Now, whether the suspicion is justified I honestly have no idea. I have my doubts, like with almost everything that Trump does.
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
We don't ever work together or share info with other countries to investigate individuals? I find that hard to believe.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:47 pmNo, it isn't.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:24 am It's OK to ask a leader from another country to help investigate a politician as long as there is reasonable suspicion.
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
Just curious, didn't we release the funds to them? Because it sure doesn't seem like we extorted them for information if we didn't get any information from them and they still got their aid...Feral wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:43 amJust curious, does withholding U.S. taxpayer's money in the form of aid appropriated by congress to pressure, i.e., extort*, the leader of "another country", figure into your opinion? Or does the fact that Trump was using our tax dollars for his own personal benefit, and not for America's benefit, not matter?IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:24 am It's OK to ask a leader from another country to help investigate a politician as long as there is reasonable suspicion. The fact Biden is running for president doesn't mean he can't be investigated by anyone. Now, whether the suspicion is justified I honestly have no idea. I have my doubts, like with almost everything that Trump does.
*Extort: obtain (something) by force, threats, or other unfair means:
force, obtain by force, obtain by threat(s), blackmail someone for, extract, exact, coerce, wring, wrest, screw, squeeze, milk, worm something out of someone; North American & Australian informal put the bite on someone for
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
The whistleblower story went public, then Ukraine got their money.
Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
Wow, the information about Parnas and the information he's shared about Yovanovitch. Remember what she testified in the hearings? No wonder they don't want her as a witness.
Don't inject Lysol.
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
What they did to her -- the "freelance" stalking -- is fucking creepy as hell.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Re: Down Ballot: Who You Got?
And this is why Trump will get re-elected.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:07 amJust curious, didn't we release the funds to them? Because it sure doesn't seem like we extorted them for information if we didn't get any information from them and they still got their aid...Feral wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:43 amJust curious, does withholding U.S. taxpayer's money in the form of aid appropriated by congress to pressure, i.e., extort*, the leader of "another country", figure into your opinion? Or does the fact that Trump was using our tax dollars for his own personal benefit, and not for America's benefit, not matter?IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:24 am It's OK to ask a leader from another country to help investigate a politician as long as there is reasonable suspicion. The fact Biden is running for president doesn't mean he can't be investigated by anyone. Now, whether the suspicion is justified I honestly have no idea. I have my doubts, like with almost everything that Trump does.
*Extort: obtain (something) by force, threats, or other unfair means:
force, obtain by force, obtain by threat(s), blackmail someone for, extract, exact, coerce, wring, wrest, screw, squeeze, milk, worm something out of someone; North American & Australian informal put the bite on someone for