Dumbfuck in charge

Ugh.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21086
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by twocoach »

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:56 pm Nah. Condescending ass hat is par for the course. You can't be condescending in nearly 75% of your posts and not expect the same to be returned your way.

My advice is don't argue outside your tier. Stick to arguing with dummies from "hicksville" like me and you won't get made to look foolish like DC just did to your post by literally dissecting it down to its' true roots.

Just embrace the rudeness around here. It'll make it easier to enjoy. Most of the libs take it easy on you since you participate in the echo chamber, so it's not that bad for you.
There isnt a single person on this board that I am less likely to take advice from than you.

I dont mind DC shredding my posts. Always an opportunity to learn something I didnt think about if he actually provides more than just a condescending putdown. I have no issue with constructive criticism when I receive it.

The fact that I am even aware that this happened at all means I already know more than 90% of the general public about it. And I have discussed in great length here the fact that I am fully aware that others have more knowledge and a different opinion on things such as this. I respect that. The great thing about opinions is that they can always be changed with additional information.
Deleted User 62

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 62 »

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:56 pm Nah. Condescending ass hat is par for the course. You can't be condescending in nearly 75% of your posts and not expect the same to be returned your way.

My advice is don't argue outside your tier. Stick to arguing with dummies from "hicksville" like me and you won't get made to look foolish like DC just did to your post by literally dissecting it down to its' true roots.
Holy Fuck, do you actually read what you advise?

Also, does DC have grab handles installed on his hips...you know, for your safety?
Deleted User 295

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 295 »

twocoach wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 4:48 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:56 pm Nah. Condescending ass hat is par for the course. You can't be condescending in nearly 75% of your posts and not expect the same to be returned your way.

My advice is don't argue outside your tier. Stick to arguing with dummies from "hicksville" like me and you won't get made to look foolish like DC just did to your post by literally dissecting it down to its' true roots.

Just embrace the rudeness around here. It'll make it easier to enjoy. Most of the libs take it easy on you since you participate in the echo chamber, so it's not that bad for you.
There isnt a single person on this board that I am less likely to take advice from than you.
There should be 2 or 3 at minimum.
Deleted User 62

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 62 »

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:07 pm
twocoach wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 4:48 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:56 pm Nah. Condescending ass hat is par for the course. You can't be condescending in nearly 75% of your posts and not expect the same to be returned your way.

My advice is don't argue outside your tier. Stick to arguing with dummies from "hicksville" like me and you won't get made to look foolish like DC just did to your post by literally dissecting it down to its' true roots.

Just embrace the rudeness around here. It'll make it easier to enjoy. Most of the libs take it easy on you since you participate in the echo chamber, so it's not that bad for you.
There isnt a single person on this board that I am less likely to take advice from than you.
There should be 2 or 3 at minimum.
Haha, I am sure one of them would be you, right?
Deleted User 295

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 295 »

jeepinjayhawk wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 4:58 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:56 pm Nah. Condescending ass hat is par for the course. You can't be condescending in nearly 75% of your posts and not expect the same to be returned your way.

My advice is don't argue outside your tier. Stick to arguing with dummies from "hicksville" like me and you won't get made to look foolish like DC just did to your post by literally dissecting it down to its' true roots.
Holy Fuck, do you actually read what you advise?

Also, does DC have grab handles installed on his hips...you know, for your safety?
Of course I do.

And of course he does.
Deleted User 295

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 295 »

jeepinjayhawk wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:09 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:07 pm
twocoach wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 4:48 pm

There isnt a single person on this board that I am less likely to take advice from than you.
There should be 2 or 3 at minimum.
Haha, I am sure one of them would be you, right?
Reading comprehension is hard...

I was saying (responding), there should be 2 or 3 people at minimum that he should be less likely to take advice from than me (on this board).
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21086
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by twocoach »

If you have to explain your attempt at a joke then it failed.
seahawk
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 7:38 pm

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by seahawk »

japhy wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:57 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:47 pm
japhy wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:19 pm

Wrong?

He's infallible!

So of course he was right to insult and belittle the military leaders. It's how you motivate people, he showed us all how that works on his TV show for years. And him telling them they would all go bankrupt if they ran a business.....who better to explain fiscal responsibility to the generals than a super successful TV personality businessman like tiny.

I tell you DC, your ability to stifle your gag reflex as you suckle is most impressive. You have a future as professional toadie, my tax cuts are safe in your soft nimbly servicing hands.
So...wut yer sayin' is you luv war?

Cuz that's wut I'm hearin'.
I'm hearing pure emotive gibberish.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This
Don't inject Lysol.
Deleted User 89

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 89 »

DCHawk1 wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:49 pm
TraditionKU wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:01 pm
TDub wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:23 am

Im saying that racism and/or dislike of Obama are not the reasons Trump killed Soleimani. It would be outright silly to believe those were the driving factors.
you don’t think trump wanted his own “bin laden”?
He's broken so many of you.
if you don’t think his decision was at least in part made to ensure that he got HIS bad guy, then i’ve got some ocean front property in arizona for ya
Deleted User 89

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 89 »

chiknbut wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:22 pm I got my DC decoder ring in the mail a few days ago and, I have to admit, it's kinda confusing.
i’m sending mine back...i think it’s broken
japhy
Contributor
Posts: 4739
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:04 pm
Location: The Tartarian Empire

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by japhy »

TraditionKU wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:40 pm
chiknbut wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:22 pm I got my DC decoder ring in the mail a few days ago and, I have to admit, it's kinda confusing.
i’m sending mine back...i think it’s broken
Most everything associated with principled conservatism is these days, swallowing the trump juice as a form of tribute affects their brains. But they got their judges and I get my tax breaks, so as long as they can live with their self degradation, who am I to complain.

Keep swallowing trumpublicans, I wanna retire early.
Nero is an angler in the lake of darkness
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by DCHawk1 »

twocoach wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:49 pm But at the core of it, there isnt even a definition of what "winning" is. How do you win nothing?
I blame George W. Bush.


Cuz, you know, that's on him.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by DCHawk1 »

japhy wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:57 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:47 pm
japhy wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:19 pm

Wrong?

He's infallible!

So of course he was right to insult and belittle the military leaders. It's how you motivate people, he showed us all how that works on his TV show for years. And him telling them they would all go bankrupt if they ran a business.....who better to explain fiscal responsibility to the generals than a super successful TV personality businessman like tiny.

I tell you DC, your ability to stifle your gag reflex as you suckle is most impressive. You have a future as professional toadie, my tax cuts are safe in your soft nimbly servicing hands.
So...wut yer sayin' is you luv war?

Cuz that's wut I'm hearin'.
I'm hearing pure emotive gibberish.
You just don't like it when I start talking about opposition to empire. It cuts too close.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by DCHawk1 »

chiknbut wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:22 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:11 pm "nah" is a reply used to signify that you have fallen into the habit, so common here, of inventing explanations to fit your predispositions. There's no evidence whatsoever in the cited passage about Trump opposing Afghanistan for "purely transactional" reasons, much less that he insulted anyone other than those in the room with him. Moreover, these comments, which you interpret as purely ignorant and self-serving (but which are likely neither), wouldn't have been heard or even known by "those serving there bravely" if someone else hadn't leaked them.

Your entire response is pure emotive gibberish. There are plenty of reasons to think that Afghanistan has been an enormous failure, and yet you ignore all of them...cUZ TRUMp! That's...well...nah.
So "nah" isn't the same as "lulz?"

I got my DC decoder ring in the mail a few days ago and, I have to admit, it's kinda confusing.
Make sure to drink your ovaltine.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by DCHawk1 »

japhy wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:45 pm
TraditionKU wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:40 pm
chiknbut wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:22 pm I got my DC decoder ring in the mail a few days ago and, I have to admit, it's kinda confusing.
i’m sending mine back...i think it’s broken
Most everything associated with principled conservatism is these days, swallowing the trump juice as a form of tribute affects their brains. But they got their judges and I get my tax breaks, so as long as they can live with their self degradation, who am I to complain.

Keep swallowing trumpublicans, I wanna retire early.
I'm still thinking.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16592
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Shirley »

Tree camo in space because


forests:

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by DCHawk1 »

Rupar is, as always, right.

The Air Force's powder blue with white, fluffy polka dots uniform is pretty awesome. But not this one.
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Deleted User 89

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 89 »

maybe it’s for cost saving?
Deleted User 295

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by Deleted User 295 »

There is a game going on. Focus!

;-)
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Dumbfuck in charge

Post by DCHawk1 »

Feral wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2020 12:42 pm Tree camo in space because


forests:

Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
Post Reply