ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:30 pm
If the press actively and purposefully covered for Kennedy, then what do you make of what fox and friends does for Trump?
Is it possible Trump appears more ridiculous and more vile simply because he is more ridiculous and more vile?
We can whatabout presidential rumors going back 50+ years, or we can watch this guy in real time.
if we’re really gonna compare the two, what would be Trump’s “ask not what your country can do” moment?
And finally, somebody put another nickel in the Clinton jar.
Fox News isn't the ENTIRE FUCKING WHITE HOUSE PRESS CORPS. You get that, right? THE ENTIRE FUCKING PRESS CORPS covered for Kennedy, who was either loaded or fucking or both almost ALL of the time.
Is Trump comparable to JFK? Nope. Not in any way. Kennedy's drug addiction -- which was an open secret, not a "rumor" -- started with his attempt to kill the literal pain he was in all of the time because of the injuries he suffered in the war. And we all know that Trump wouldn't allow his dainty bone-spurred feet touch a combat boot.
But here's the thing: if you're going to couch your criticism of Trump in the language of historical uniqueness -- "unlike any other," "destroying the dignity that existed," "first and worst" -- then you have to be ABLE to back that up. You can't get your panties in a twist if, after you declare "he's the only one evar to do this," someone responds with actual, factual, historical information demonstrating that you're wrong. Snowflake.
The rhetoric surrounding Trump is so absurd and hyperbolic, that even smart, sane people don't realize it.
Now,
to repeat myself, the history doesn't negate or legitimize Trump's actions. It's his own damn fault he got caught, and now he has to deal with it.
But it apparently never occurs to you that THE REASON THE GREAT UNWASHED MASSES DON'T BELIEVE WHAT YOU SAY ABOUT TRUMP IS BECAUSE SO MUCH OF IT EASILY DISPROVABLE NONSENSE. "Uhhh...wut the fuk is wrong with Republicans? They don't want to impeach trump, despite the fact that I've told them over and over that he grabbed Sally Hemings by the poosie!"
The facts are DAMNING ENOUGH. There's no reason to exaggerate them and undermine your case.