who ya got?

Ugh.
Deleted User 295

Re: who ya got?

Post by Deleted User 295 »

TraditionKU wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:56 pm i’d vote for pete
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Mjl »

ousdahl wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:51 pm More and more, I think dems are best to go all in on Pete.

He’s not over 70. He has that small town midwestern thing going for him. And if and when Trump’s campaign rhetoric turns to red meat for the base, that seems more likely to backfire than any other of the inevitable personal attacks.
It's crazy. It's so obvious. And they probably aren't going to do it.
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Mjl »

If they can isolate this to Pete vs Bernie, Pete will win. And he'll win the Presidency.

But Klobuchar, Biden, and Bloomberg may end up handing this to Bernie.
Deleted User 295

Re: who ya got?

Post by Deleted User 295 »

Pete is killing this town hall right now. He's so much better than any of the other front runners and it's not even close.
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15508
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by TDub »

Pete isnt a bad choice, I like Pete
Just Ledoux it
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Shirley »

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16584
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by Shirley »

Since the Iowa caucus, Pete's support in NH has increased significantly in this poll:

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21069
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by twocoach »

ousdahl wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:51 pm More and more, I think dems are best to go all in on Pete.

He’s not over 70. He has that small town midwestern thing going for him. And if and when Trump’s campaign rhetoric turns to red meat for the base, that seems more likely to backfire than any other of the inevitable personal attacks.
Well, I don't like Biden and both Warren and Sanders are too far left and too extreme financially for me so either Pete, Yang or Klobuchar are my only real option. By the time my primary gets here, others will have chosen who I get to "choose". We'll see.
Deleted User 295

Re: who ya got?

Post by Deleted User 295 »

Yang has 0% chance of beating the front runners.

Klobuchar might be wise to try to pair up with Pete, because I don't think she can catch up at this point. Those 2 together would pull enough of us reasonable middle of the road people to steal a few red states from trump and crush him.
Deleted User 289

Re: who ya got?

Post by Deleted User 289 »

twocoach wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 8:08 am
ousdahl wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:51 pm More and more, I think dems are best to go all in on Pete.

He’s not over 70. He has that small town midwestern thing going for him. And if and when Trump’s campaign rhetoric turns to red meat for the base, that seems more likely to backfire than any other of the inevitable personal attacks.
Well, I don't like Biden and both Warren and Sanders are too far left and too extreme financially for me so either Pete, Yang or Klobuchar are my only real option. By the time my primary gets here, others will have chosen who I get to "choose". We'll see.
You didn't mention Bloomberg. I could ask why - but it's really none of my business why.
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8563
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by DCHawk1 »

Sad.

Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
chiknbut
Posts: 1783
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 3:49 pm
Location: JRP Lunchroom

Re: who ya got?

Post by chiknbut »

DCHawk1 wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:51 am Sad.

Breaks my heart.

Fucking asshole.
User avatar
HouseDivided
Posts: 2930
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:24 pm

Re: who ya got?

Post by HouseDivided »

DCHawk1 wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:51 am Sad.

Is it weird that I wasn't even aware he was a challenger?
“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21069
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by twocoach »

Grandma wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:33 am
twocoach wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 8:08 am
ousdahl wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:51 pm More and more, I think dems are best to go all in on Pete.

He’s not over 70. He has that small town midwestern thing going for him. And if and when Trump’s campaign rhetoric turns to red meat for the base, that seems more likely to backfire than any other of the inevitable personal attacks.
Well, I don't like Biden and both Warren and Sanders are too far left and too extreme financially for me so either Pete, Yang or Klobuchar are my only real option. By the time my primary gets here, others will have chosen who I get to "choose". We'll see.
You didn't mention Bloomberg. I could ask why - but it's really none of my business why.
Too old. Too rich. Zero chance he is still in it by the time my primary comes around so no sense investing any time into studying his platform.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21069
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by twocoach »

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 8:16 am Yang has 0% chance of beating the front runners.

Klobuchar might be wise to try to pair up with Pete, because I don't think she can catch up at this point. Those 2 together would pull enough of us reasonable middle of the road people to steal a few red states from trump and crush him.
Doesnt feel like they need to pull middle of the road people. Not many middle of the road folks I know have any sort of interest in voting for Trump. Those that support him at this point are the diehards who will vote R no matter what.

Seems like the Dems just need to not ostracize the far left supporters. Warren and Sanders have tried to figure out a way to pitch their platforms as normal but I am not buying it. If someone more central like Pete or Biden win the nomination and the far left still shows up to vote, Trump is done.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by ousdahl »

Do dems really need to worry about not ostracizing far left supporters?

Are they really gonna loose the far left vote to anyone else? Third party nobody? Bloomberg? Trump??
User avatar
MICHHAWK
Posts: 6090
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:01 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by MICHHAWK »

twocoach wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:09 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 8:16 am Yang has 0% chance of beating the front runners.

Klobuchar might be wise to try to pair up with Pete, because I don't think she can catch up at this point. Those 2 together would pull enough of us reasonable middle of the road people to steal a few red states from trump and crush him.
Doesnt feel like they need to pull middle of the road people. Not many middle of the road folks I know have any sort of interest in voting for Trump. Those that support him at this point are the diehards who will vote R no matter what.
Not true. I am middle of the road. I have no interest in voting for dt. But I have even less interest in voting for bs or ew.

jb yes. mb yes. mayor pete yes. klubacher yes. bs or ew, hard no.
Deleted User 289

Re: who ya got?

Post by Deleted User 289 »

twocoach wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:02 pm
Grandma wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:33 am
twocoach wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 8:08 am
Well, I don't like Biden and both Warren and Sanders are too far left and too extreme financially for me so either Pete, Yang or Klobuchar are my only real option. By the time my primary gets here, others will have chosen who I get to "choose". We'll see.
You didn't mention Bloomberg. I could ask why - but it's really none of my business why.
Too old. Too rich. Zero chance he is still in it by the time my primary comes around so no sense investing any time into studying his platform.
Fair and honest answer. Thanks.
My worthless opinion, there is no one Trump would take more pleasure in beating and more pain in losing to. Like I said - worthless opinion.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21069
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by twocoach »

MICHHAWK wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:22 pm
twocoach wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:09 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 8:16 am Yang has 0% chance of beating the front runners.

Klobuchar might be wise to try to pair up with Pete, because I don't think she can catch up at this point. Those 2 together would pull enough of us reasonable middle of the road people to steal a few red states from trump and crush him.
Doesnt feel like they need to pull middle of the road people. Not many middle of the road folks I know have any sort of interest in voting for Trump. Those that support him at this point are the diehards who will vote R no matter what.
Not true. I am middle of the road. I have no interest in voting for dt. But I have even less interest in voting for bs or ew.

jb yes. mb yes. mayor pete yes. klubacher yes. bs or ew, hard no.
My "they" was Pete and his folks, not the DNC.

You seem to agree with me that Pete doesn't need to pair up with Klobuchar to win over the middle because he would already have your vote between Pete and Trump.

Sanders and Warren are the ones who need to worry about who they choose as their VP if they win the nomination. They are the ones who stand the furthest from the middle of the road folks and thus, would need a good VP choice, not Pete.
User avatar
MICHHAWK
Posts: 6090
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:01 am

Re: who ya got?

Post by MICHHAWK »

No matter who bs or ew select for a running mate, I could not vote for them.
Post Reply