Content for content's sake

Coffee talk.
User avatar
ChalkRocker
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 1:26 pm

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by ChalkRocker »

I don't know what to believe in anymore...
Please, I implore you to be reasonable...
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15179
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by TDub »

Just Ledoux it
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

Welp. Ous will be busy getting ready for the deposition now.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by ousdahl »

I heard about that, and it’s interesting, cuz normally ski resorts absolve themselves of any liability, and are quick to point that out if and when anyone is harmed.

In this case, though, the chair was not in normal functioning order...
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

Hope they have enough insurance.
Deleted User 62

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by Deleted User 62 »

They can always plead for a pardon.

What does their political donation ledger look like?
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 15179
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by TDub »

Wrong board. This one has content.
Just Ledoux it
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by ousdahl »

sooo what’s up everybody?

anyone have some good content to share?

cuz doing so would make me feel content today.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 34828
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by pdub »

I was having a debate over whether content placement on a web page affects SEO.

A particular client feels it doesn't matter and while Google has come out a few times recently to say it doesn't, ( and it definitely used to within the last few years ), they've also come out and said, 'but be sure to place your most useful content front and center'...so that kind of back peddling leads me to believe you should still place your most relevant content and keywords in the head tag and early on in the body.

I'm pretty positive that if I took the bottom footer content and swapped it with the first visible content of the page, my search rank would be affected.

Painter, you around, any thoughts?
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by ousdahl »

Just wait until OP realizes you’re posting work stuff in the content thread...
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 15684
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by Shirley »

pdub wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 7:55 am I was having a debate over whether content placement on a web page affects SEO.

A particular client feels it doesn't matter and while Google has come out a few times recently to say it doesn't, ( and it definitely used to within the last few years ), they've also come out and said, 'but be sure to place your most useful content front and center'...so that kind of back peddling leads me to believe you should still place your most relevant content and keywords in the head tag and early on in the body.

I'm pretty positive that if I took the bottom footer content and swapped it with the first visible content of the page, my search rank would be affected.

Painter, you around, any thoughts?
I don't know anything about this subject, (so this certainly doesn't deserve "content" status), but ain't nobody looking below the fold, pdub.



Can't believe you didn't know that.
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 34828
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Content for content's sake

Post by pdub »

The fold isn't real anymore.
Haven't you heard?
Post Reply