Page 6 of 84
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 7:37 am
by kubandalum
March 2000, The Independent (UK):
“According to Dr. David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, within a few years winter snowfall ‘will become a very rare and exciting event.’
“‘Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,’ he said.”
https://wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/ ... endent.pdf [.pdf of Independent article]
7 inches of snow this morning. I’m so excited.
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:01 am
by Deleted User 62
kubandalum wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 7:37 am
March 2000, The Independent (UK):
“According to Dr. David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, within a few years winter snowfall ‘will become a very rare and exciting event.’
“‘Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,’ he said.”
https://wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/ ... endent.pdf [.pdf of Independent article]
7 inches of snow this morning. I’m so excited.
JFC
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 6:55 pm
by dolomite
Been colder this winter than usual for us Arizonans. I wish Tradition would hurry up and get green as I’m getting sick of this shit.
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:31 am
by Deleted User 89
easy enough for high school science students to understand...
https://grist.org/article/8-percent-of- ... hat-gives/
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:26 am
by pdub
You're an idiot if you don't believe in global warming.
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:04 am
by PhDhawk
pdub wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:26 am
You're an idiot if you don't believe in global warming.
You're an idiot either way.
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:01 am
by Deleted User 62
But, is is colder in Arizona...
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 2:15 pm
by ousdahl
Man, a while back I went on a date with this babely brunette.
She took pride in her willpower or whatever. To prove so, the example she uses right out the gate was outing herself as a climate change denier. She just went on and on about how the scientific community’s consensus just wasn’t enough of a consensus, so short of that, were all better off keeping our heads in the sand.
I tried asking at what doubling down on skepticism was reckless given the consequences otherwise, to no avail.
I wish I could have figured out how to politely differentiate between will power and just willfully ignorant. She was so stubborn about so many dumb things, and her personality just generally ruined it.
It was a shame too, cuz she was otherwise such a babe.
(If we had hooked up I would make some joke about pounding her hole even harder than co2 pounding a hole in the ozone, but nope)
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 12:20 pm
by DCHawk1
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 21, 2018 2:13 pm
Nope.
And most importantly of all, the actual "science" of climate has long been overtaken by the politics of it, and the end goal of much of that politics is to control people's behavior, not save the world. (Which is why meat is the next target, and why I noted that it would be, as far back as the .commie days.)
/thread?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-world- ... d=62496460
A hamburger a week, but no more — that's about as much red meat people should eat to do what's best for their health and the planet, according to a report seeking to overhaul the world's diet.
Eggs should be limited to fewer than about four a week, the report says. Dairy foods should be about a serving a day, or less.
The report from a panel of nutrition, agriculture and environmental experts recommends a plant-based diet....
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 1:15 pm
by Deleted User 89
commercially produced meat, imo, is a major thing americans could change. and as suggested, such a change would help on numerous fronts
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 1:28 pm
by Leawood
The last steak I had was in October. I rarely eat beef anymore because, for me, it is difficult to digest. Mostly eat chicken and fish (not necessarily healthier). A close friend of mine had a heart attack, which caused me to reassess how I eat.
Still eat eggs, but soft boiled.
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 1:38 pm
by Deleted User 89
almost without fail i’d prefer venison, elk, or bison, over beef...bison for sure
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 7:15 pm
by DCHawk1
Doesn't matter what you prefer.
You don't tell me what to eat. I don't tell you.
It's that simple.
And yes, I try to eat about a pound of ground beef a day.
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 7:17 pm
by Deleted User 89
good for you?
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 7:20 pm
by DCHawk1
It is. Very.
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 8:01 pm
by Deleted User 62
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 19, 2019 7:15 pm
And yes, I try to eat about a pound of ground beef a day.
Fatty?
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 8:06 pm
by DCHawk1
I get it. You're old. But that's not how it works.
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2019 8:53 pm
by Deleted User 89
DC just hates his colon is all
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 6:40 pm
by Deleted User 89
Re: an even more frightening perspective
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 7:16 pm
by Deleted User 62
Maybe someone could read this toTrump...