Page 6 of 94
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 8:43 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2023 7:33 am
I'm still waiting to see if Robert f Kennedy Jr actually runs. If so he might be the first Democrat candidate ive endorsed in awhile. If not vivek is probably the best candidate I've seen so far. Better than biden or Trump thats for sure
Why would you support RFKjr.?
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 10:38 am
by randylahey
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2023 8:43 am
randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2023 7:33 am
I'm still waiting to see if Robert f Kennedy Jr actually runs. If so he might be the first Democrat candidate ive endorsed in awhile. If not vivek is probably the best candidate I've seen so far. Better than biden or Trump thats for sure
Why would you support RFKjr.?
I agree with his mindset on a lot of things. If he actually runs, I'll give him his own thread and discuss it
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 10:53 am
by KUTradition
omg…his own thread
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 11:45 am
by randylahey
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 3:19 pm
by Overlander
I dunno.
I want to vote for Summer…she promised glitter dispensers in the girls restrooms
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 5:26 pm
by Mjl
We want to set a maximum of 8 years of service for the people who have jobs requiring expertise.
That's gotta be the stupidest idea I've ever heard. And I read KCrim.
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 7:28 pm
by randylahey
Mjl wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2023 5:26 pm
We want to set a maximum of 8 years of service for the people who have jobs requiring expertise.
That's gotta be the stupidest idea I've ever heard. And I read KCrim.
This is dumb. Career politicians... the longer they are around, the more corrupt they are. Look at the Pelosis, McConnells of the world. Thats what we wanna avoid
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 10:15 pm
by DCHawk1
Mjl wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2023 5:26 pm
We want to set a maximum of 8 years of service for the people who have jobs requiring expertise.
That's gotta be the stupidest idea I've ever heard. And I read KCrim.
Thank you President Wilson
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 1:27 am
by Mjl
randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2023 7:28 pm
Mjl wrote: ↑Tue Mar 21, 2023 5:26 pm
We want to set a maximum of 8 years of service for the people who have jobs requiring expertise.
That's gotta be the stupidest idea I've ever heard. And I read KCrim.
This is dumb. Career politicians... the longer they are around, the more corrupt they are. Look at the Pelosis, McConnells of the world. Thats what we wanna avoid
You do know the difference between bureaucrats and representatives... right?
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:42 am
by jfish26
I didn't have an issue with not having term limits on Congress...until Citizens United.
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:44 am
by KUTradition
the idea that it takes experience, particularly when running a country like the US (i mean, just foreign policy alone), appears to have been completely lost on some
but hey, #s of clicks/shares/views/likes rules the day
(or somethin)
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:26 am
by Mjl
I have no problem with congressional term limits.
That's not what he's talking about.
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:56 am
by DCHawk1
KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:44 am
the idea that it takes experience, particularly when running a country like the US (i mean, just foreign policy alone), appears to have been completely lost on some
but hey, #s of clicks/shares/views/likes rules the day
(or somethin)
lulz
Howz that foreign policy workin' out for the experts?
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:02 pm
by KUTradition
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:56 am
KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:44 am
the idea that it takes experience, particularly when running a country like the US (i mean, just foreign policy alone), appears to have been completely lost on some
but hey, #s of clicks/shares/views/likes rules the day
(or somethin)
lulz
Howz that foreign policy workin' out for the experts?
which foreign policy and which experts?
are you agreeing with the candidate’s premise, or just doing your best illy imitation?
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:02 pm
by Mjl
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:56 am
KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:44 am
the idea that it takes experience, particularly when running a country like the US (i mean, just foreign policy alone), appears to have been completely lost on some
but hey, #s of clicks/shares/views/likes rules the day
(or somethin)
lulz
Howz that foreign policy workin' out for the experts?
You want term limits for absolutely everyone working in government?
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:31 pm
by DCHawk1
KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:02 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:56 am
KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:44 am
the idea that it takes experience, particularly when running a country like the US (i mean, just foreign policy alone), appears to have been completely lost on some
but hey, #s of clicks/shares/views/likes rules the day
(or somethin)
lulz
Howz that foreign policy workin' out for the experts?
which foreign policy and which experts?
are you agreeing with the candidate’s premise, or just doing your best illy imitation?
Neither. I'm trying hard to come to grips with your scientistic embrace of the cult of expertise.
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:32 pm
by DCHawk1
Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:02 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:56 am
KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:44 am
the idea that it takes experience, particularly when running a country like the US (i mean, just foreign policy alone), appears to have been completely lost on some
but hey, #s of clicks/shares/views/likes rules the day
(or somethin)
lulz
Howz that foreign policy workin' out for the experts?
You want term limits for absolutely everyone working in government?
Me? No. But I do think that Vivek a substantive policy goal here, in addition to the obvious partisan red meat.
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:39 pm
by KUTradition
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:31 pm
KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:02 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:56 am
lulz
Howz that foreign policy workin' out for the experts?
which foreign policy and which experts?
are you agreeing with the candidate’s premise, or just doing your best illy imitation?
Neither. I'm trying hard to come to grips with your scientistic embrace of the cult of expertise.
lol
i just appreciate that it often takes a certain level of experience to get shit done
i’d think you of all people could appreciate such a stance when talking about the bloated bureaucracies that make up this fine nation
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 1:36 pm
by Mjl
Michael Lewis has written and spoke about this subject a ton in both his podcast and in The Fifth Risk. I found his pro-expertise arguments convincing.
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2023 7:50 am
by zsn
Come out and just say it. Vivek’s proposal (if can call it that) is just idiotic. So by extension academic bureaucracies are too bloated with entrenched (tenured) professors and thus all instructions will be conducted by term-limited teaching assistants? As we have said before, Vivek is a stupid person’s idea of a smart person sounds like.