Shirley wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 3:14 pm
Wow, I didn't think it was a flagrant...
my only thought is that it’s because it was above the shoulders
yuge call regardless
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 3:18 pm
If I'm Jamie Dixon, I'm furious.
^^^
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
With the benefit of multiple angles on the replay, I think the hand came up after he passed the ball. I don’t think this one is as clear either way. Make up for the phantom call on KJ?
I don’t think it merited stopping the game and calling a flagrant on review, but it has to be a foul in real time, I would think. So many common fouls get called for minor contact, catching the guy in the face with an elbow to secure the ball has to be too.