Kansas Crimson

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 7:30 am Musk and X are epicenter of US election misinformation, experts say

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/wrong- ... 024-11-04/

do better, randi

I think the Elon problem will be the most important item - and by a long ways - on Harris's desk.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022926

and…

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamane ... le/2779044


do better, randi

Bookmark this.

Sadly, but hilariously, probably need to bookmark this also.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 1:07 pm Sadly, but hilariously, probably need to bookmark this also.

Breaking news, signature matching is a dumb waste of time and resources and creates more problems than it solves.

twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 1:13 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 1:07 pm Sadly, but hilariously, probably need to bookmark this also.

Breaking news, signature matching is a dumb waste of time and resources and creates more problems than it solves.

As someone who has helped a teenager get a license and bank account recently, yep. Whatever he scribbled down won’t be what he signs checks and documents with when he’s a real person.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 1:15 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 1:13 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 1:07 pm Sadly, but hilariously, probably need to bookmark this also.

Breaking news, signature matching is a dumb waste of time and resources and creates more problems than it solves.

As someone who has helped a teenager get a license and bank account recently, yep. Whatever he scribbled down won’t be what he signs checks and documents with when he’s a real person.

I'm a grown ass adult and my signature changes every few years. We barely sign things any more other than a POS device that we sign with our finger to make some credit card purchases.

the ability to write your name is certainly too much to ask.

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 8:51 am https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022926

and…

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamane ... le/2779044


do better, randi

What, no Twitter posts?

My signature has always been a unique scribble. You may get the 1st letter of my 1st name but after that, good luck.

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 1:43 pm My signature has always been a unique scribble. You may get the 1st letter of my 1st name but after that, good luck.

Me too. First initial is literally the only thing halfway recognizable.

In my former career, there were instances where, if asked to sign something that I really didn't want to sign, I signed EDWARD V HALEN (very clearly). Never once got called out on it.

This is documented by the Georgia Sec of State:

https://www.rawstory.com/georgia-electi ... b-threats/

Russian origin bomb threats to black majority voting centers in Georgia.

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 1:18 pm the ability to write your name is certainly too much to ask.

The notion that some random employee at the election office visibly comparing two signatures taken years apart is some sort of "Validation" of anything is too absurd to be taken seriously.

musk amplifying Q-anon nonsense…even bringing back pizza-gate

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2024 3:13 pm musk amplifying Q-anon nonsense…even bringing back pizza-gate

I don't know if my dog recently pissed on the carpet under my desk or if Musk's desperation is just that strong.

the problem with information is, how self-fulfilling it still is no matter what.

no matter how reliably-sourced you think you are or you try to be, you're always gonna be prone to bias. You can find info out there to support damn near anything you want. Hell, twocoach even found a link that says Democrats provide universal healthcare!

The bias can be internal - like us individually leaning on sources and views that confirm our own opinions and values, and avoiding or dismissing sources and views that don't.

The bias can also be more external, so to speak. After all, so much of the media is owned by the exact same corporations and evil rich people that all have a very vested interest in advancing their own agendas. The government and the country and the western world all wants to maintain their own interests and views too.

I realize that sounds kinda deep state-y tho too but I think there's truth to it.

I mean, you ever pick some world event, and compare and contrast how western media vs. elsewhere covers it? Sheesh!

I think the counter to misinformation is not simply assuming there's a counter to misinformation out there. Some mis-misinformation silver bullet of a source. Sure, there's good information and bad information, and some information is better than others, but the more important thing is to just kinda take everything with a certain grain of salt.

That's hard tho, cuz it also means an openness to potentially changing one's own beliefs, and turns out that's an incredibly hairy thing to do.

nah, fuck it. Just assume this whole post is misinformation.

Lacks self-reflection too!

You should slow down a bit

I think we all should.

But some more than others.
You kinda just said you can make your own reality—which of course is true—but ultimately is at best counter productive and at worst extremely dangerous.