Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:53 pm
My wife was supposed to reopen her labs Monday, now they are being told that date might move back significantly.
Some fairly good tax write offs there.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:51 pm It'll be interesting if there starts to be some push back to working from home. Mostly people have focused on the positives. But at some point there will be a realization that, a large chunk of square footage in my home is now dedicated to work, A large portion of my internet usage is now for work, How much am I paying for work equipment, hardware, desk, chairs, pens, etc. that used to be paid for by work.
In a town hall online meeting, the question was already asked about internet reimbursement since that's now a requirement...the administrators said that wasn't something they were prepared to do at this time. Wonder what will happen long term. It's not like commuting costs, where they can argue you choose where to live. If lots of people HAVE to work from home, what will become standard work contributions to do so. I mean, even if a company can now downsize to a smaller office building for example, are those savings going to be passed on to the employees?
I believe youve confused me with someone else. Ive been on the covid is bad, we need to do somethinf about it train since the beginning.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 11:59 amLike I said, perhaps the increased number of people gathered together gets offset by the decreased number of folks who ventured out during the protest. Our entire downtown area was closed during our protests. We had another group of a few hundred people who basically took over a main intersection in our midtown area. The result of all of this was that the vast majority of or city shut down for several days. Businesses closed. Shoppers and bar and restaurant visits ceased. Gatherings at parks ceased. All so a few thousand people could protest. Was the net result of those few thousand people gathering more or less than the net result of the tens of thousands of people who did not do what they would have done without the protests? I don't have access to any numbers to make an educated answer. I'd say only that it likely resulted in more cases of COVID than if the entire city was shut down and there WEREN'T any protests.
You seem to be perfectly fine assuming that those big crowds in the pictures mean an increased risk of COVID while ignoring any of the other factors because it fits your "protests = bad" narrative.
So yes, the protests impacted covid case numbers. But so did the number of people who sheltered at home during the protest when they wouldn't have ahd the protests not been happening.
Aren't the rules for a home office pretty strict though? Like, even if you work for 8 hours at your kitchen table it doesn't count if you also eat meals there? Which would make it a lot more likely for an employee to ask for money if say, he/she has to add a room/outbuilding/convert a spare bedroom, etc. in order to get said tax break.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:54 pmSome fairly good tax write offs there.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:51 pm It'll be interesting if there starts to be some push back to working from home. Mostly people have focused on the positives. But at some point there will be a realization that, a large chunk of square footage in my home is now dedicated to work, A large portion of my internet usage is now for work, How much am I paying for work equipment, hardware, desk, chairs, pens, etc. that used to be paid for by work.
In a town hall online meeting, the question was already asked about internet reimbursement since that's now a requirement...the administrators said that wasn't something they were prepared to do at this time. Wonder what will happen long term. It's not like commuting costs, where they can argue you choose where to live. If lots of people HAVE to work from home, what will become standard work contributions to do so. I mean, even if a company can now downsize to a smaller office building for example, are those savings going to be passed on to the employees?
Exactly. I've made it pretty clear I've been opposed to ALL protests everytime they've come up. I'd actually have more respect for someone who defended them all than I would the people trying to defend the protests they support after being opposed to the ones they didn's support. It's just hypocritical.TDub wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:57 pmI believe youve confused me with someone else. Ive been on the covid is bad, we need to do somethinf about it train since the beginning.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 11:59 amLike I said, perhaps the increased number of people gathered together gets offset by the decreased number of folks who ventured out during the protest. Our entire downtown area was closed during our protests. We had another group of a few hundred people who basically took over a main intersection in our midtown area. The result of all of this was that the vast majority of or city shut down for several days. Businesses closed. Shoppers and bar and restaurant visits ceased. Gatherings at parks ceased. All so a few thousand people could protest. Was the net result of those few thousand people gathering more or less than the net result of the tens of thousands of people who did not do what they would have done without the protests? I don't have access to any numbers to make an educated answer. I'd say only that it likely resulted in more cases of COVID than if the entire city was shut down and there WEREN'T any protests.
You seem to be perfectly fine assuming that those big crowds in the pictures mean an increased risk of COVID while ignoring any of the other factors because it fits your "protests = bad" narrative.
So yes, the protests impacted covid case numbers. But so did the number of people who sheltered at home during the protest when they wouldn't have ahd the protests not been happening.
Where have I been ok with other gatherings?
I asked a simple question. Do you believe the protests increase the chances of covid spread?
Agreed. Would my employer let me take my fancy electronic, adjustable work desk home? We arent allowed to log directly into our work network from home, instead we remote into our work PC's. Would they provide me a PC to use at home? If not, I need to upgrade my home PC. This whole single monitor thing isn't cutting it.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:51 pm It'll be interesting if there starts to be some push back to working from home. Mostly people have focused on the positives. But at some point there will be a realization that, a large chunk of square footage in my home is now dedicated to work, A large portion of my internet usage is now for work, How much am I paying for work equipment, hardware, desk, chairs, pens, etc. that used to be paid for by work.
In a town hall online meeting, the question was already asked about internet reimbursement since that's now a requirement...the administrators said that wasn't something they were prepared to do at this time. Wonder what will happen long term. It's not like commuting costs, where they can argue you choose where to live. If lots of people HAVE to work from home, what will become standard work contributions to do so. I mean, even if a company can now downsize to a smaller office building for example, are those savings going to be passed on to the employees?
Depends on how you set up your "office". unless things were changed by the latest tax bill (DON'T GET ME STARTED ON HOW THAT FUCKING THING HAS AFFECTED THE PLANO HOUSEHOLD)….you could deduct the square footage of your dedicated "office" space on the percentage of the total footage of your home.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:57 pmAren't the rules for a home office pretty strict though? Like, even if you work for 8 hours at your kitchen table it doesn't count if you also eat meals there? Which would make it a lot more likely for an employee to ask for money if say, he/she has to add a room/outbuilding/convert a spare bedroom, etc. in order to get said tax break.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:54 pmSome fairly good tax write offs there.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:51 pm It'll be interesting if there starts to be some push back to working from home. Mostly people have focused on the positives. But at some point there will be a realization that, a large chunk of square footage in my home is now dedicated to work, A large portion of my internet usage is now for work, How much am I paying for work equipment, hardware, desk, chairs, pens, etc. that used to be paid for by work.
In a town hall online meeting, the question was already asked about internet reimbursement since that's now a requirement...the administrators said that wasn't something they were prepared to do at this time. Wonder what will happen long term. It's not like commuting costs, where they can argue you choose where to live. If lots of people HAVE to work from home, what will become standard work contributions to do so. I mean, even if a company can now downsize to a smaller office building for example, are those savings going to be passed on to the employees?
More permissible? Are there still protests going on?PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:03 pmExactly. I've made it pretty clear I've been opposed to ALL protests everytime they've come up. I'd actually have more respect for someone who defended them all than I would the people trying to defend the protests they support after being opposed to the ones they didn's support. It's just hypocritical.TDub wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:57 pmI believe youve confused me with someone else. Ive been on the covid is bad, we need to do somethinf about it train since the beginning.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 11:59 am
Like I said, perhaps the increased number of people gathered together gets offset by the decreased number of folks who ventured out during the protest. Our entire downtown area was closed during our protests. We had another group of a few hundred people who basically took over a main intersection in our midtown area. The result of all of this was that the vast majority of or city shut down for several days. Businesses closed. Shoppers and bar and restaurant visits ceased. Gatherings at parks ceased. All so a few thousand people could protest. Was the net result of those few thousand people gathering more or less than the net result of the tens of thousands of people who did not do what they would have done without the protests? I don't have access to any numbers to make an educated answer. I'd say only that it likely resulted in more cases of COVID than if the entire city was shut down and there WEREN'T any protests.
You seem to be perfectly fine assuming that those big crowds in the pictures mean an increased risk of COVID while ignoring any of the other factors because it fits your "protests = bad" narrative.
So yes, the protests impacted covid case numbers. But so did the number of people who sheltered at home during the protest when they wouldn't have ahd the protests not been happening.
Where have I been ok with other gatherings?
I asked a simple question. Do you believe the protests increase the chances of covid spread?
For sure there's A LOT of social pressure to not blame the BLM protests for contributing to the spike in cases. I think that's why you're seeing a paper published online immediately without peer-review and also then being reported on by CNN.
For comparison, I submitted a paper, two months ago, it was sent out for review on May 12, and I still haven't gotten reviews back. The pace of this just doesn't happen normally. There's clearly a desire out there to make these protests more permissible in the current pandemic.
I need to get a new tax person.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:05 pmDepends on how you set up your "office". unless things were changed by the latest tax bill (DON'T GET ME STARTED ON HOW THAT FUCKING THING HAS AFFECTED THE PLANO HOUSEHOLD)….you could deduct the square footage of your dedicated "office" space on the percentage of the total footage of your home.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:57 pmAren't the rules for a home office pretty strict though? Like, even if you work for 8 hours at your kitchen table it doesn't count if you also eat meals there? Which would make it a lot more likely for an employee to ask for money if say, he/she has to add a room/outbuilding/convert a spare bedroom, etc. in order to get said tax break.
Who is to say that your home office shouldn't have a full bath as well as "Parking space".
How much cleaning supplies, paper, internet, phone, etc is utilized for strictly business purposes? Who could possibly know.
*** Talk to your tax person or accountant***
My best friend has a saying-"if you ain't cheatin'....you're cheatin' yourself."
If they're not going on in Omaha, then I guess not.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:05 pmMore permissible? Are there still protests going on?PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:03 pmExactly. I've made it pretty clear I've been opposed to ALL protests everytime they've come up. I'd actually have more respect for someone who defended them all than I would the people trying to defend the protests they support after being opposed to the ones they didn's support. It's just hypocritical.TDub wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:57 pm
I believe youve confused me with someone else. Ive been on the covid is bad, we need to do somethinf about it train since the beginning.
Where have I been ok with other gatherings?
I asked a simple question. Do you believe the protests increase the chances of covid spread?
For sure there's A LOT of social pressure to not blame the BLM protests for contributing to the spike in cases. I think that's why you're seeing a paper published online immediately without peer-review and also then being reported on by CNN.
For comparison, I submitted a paper, two months ago, it was sent out for review on May 12, and I still haven't gotten reviews back. The pace of this just doesn't happen normally. There's clearly a desire out there to make these protests more permissible in the current pandemic.
If you have a moment between smart-ass responses, that'd be great. I enjoy reading your actual adult responses.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:10 pmIf they're not going on in Omaha, then I guess not.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:05 pmMore permissible? Are there still protests going on?PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:03 pm
Exactly. I've made it pretty clear I've been opposed to ALL protests everytime they've come up. I'd actually have more respect for someone who defended them all than I would the people trying to defend the protests they support after being opposed to the ones they didn's support. It's just hypocritical.
For sure there's A LOT of social pressure to not blame the BLM protests for contributing to the spike in cases. I think that's why you're seeing a paper published online immediately without peer-review and also then being reported on by CNN.
For comparison, I submitted a paper, two months ago, it was sent out for review on May 12, and I still haven't gotten reviews back. The pace of this just doesn't happen normally. There's clearly a desire out there to make these protests more permissible in the current pandemic.
We have a dedicated office in the house but my wife is getting sick of working at the breakfast bar since I moved in here. If it looks like I am going to be WAH for a long time, I may need to carve out some space in my basement to put in a desk and move my PC down there. If I could get my employer to provide the desk, chair and PC equipment, that would be optimal. Maybe they'd spring for whatever it costs them to build out a new work PC and I put it towards building my own PC to remote in. I havent built a PC in a few years, that would be fun.jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:05 pmDepends on how you set up your "office". unless things were changed by the latest tax bill (DON'T GET ME STARTED ON HOW THAT FUCKING THING HAS AFFECTED THE PLANO HOUSEHOLD)….you could deduct the square footage of your dedicated "office" space on the percentage of the total footage of your home.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 1:57 pmAren't the rules for a home office pretty strict though? Like, even if you work for 8 hours at your kitchen table it doesn't count if you also eat meals there? Which would make it a lot more likely for an employee to ask for money if say, he/she has to add a room/outbuilding/convert a spare bedroom, etc. in order to get said tax break.
Who is to say that your home office shouldn't have a full bath as well as "Parking space".
How much cleaning supplies, paper, internet, phone, etc is utilized for strictly business purposes? Who could possibly know.
*** Talk to your tax person or accountant***
My best friend has a saying-"if you ain't cheatin'....you're cheatin' yourself."
Well, I think it's pretty irresponsible to report on a study that hasn't gone through peer-review, I don't think that's something CNN would normally do.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:19 pmIf you have a moment between smart-ass responses, that'd be great. I enjoy reading your actual adult responses.
I haven't been watching any national TV lately; my kids and I have a project going on. I just haven't seen that protests were still going so your comment stood out to me.
I thought this was a pretty measured, logical examination of the numbers. There is a difference between testing positive and being ill; there is a difference between being mildly symptomatic and gravely ill; there is a difference between a person younger than 60 being ill and one over 60 being ill.