Kansas Crimson

Yea.

Well, the thing is, if you actually spend time around the “pro-life” movement, they DO give lip service to things like anti-war and anti-capital punishment and anti-homicide, in instances such as this.

But the only issue that they actually get actually outraged about, and march in the streets about, and take to the ballot box, and stack the courts to impose, is telling wimmin what to do with yall’s uteruses.

So much dumb

Pdub’s anti-vax stance is so transparent

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:45 am Yea.

Well, the thing is, if you actually spend time around the “pro-life” movement, they DO give lip service to things like anti-war and anti-capital punishment and anti-homicide, in instances such as this.

But the only issue that they actually get actually outraged about, and march in the streets about, and take to the ballot box, and stack the courts to impose, is telling wimmin what to do with yall’s uteruses.

you forgot restricting voting rights…ya know, so the totality of American citizens can actually vote and have the freedom to choose

As soon as I asked does it not apply to all choices I thought, oh shit this is about to be about vaxxes again, ain’t it.

But it’s funny, cuz scotus just issued somewhat conflicting opinions on just that.

They ruled against vaccine mandates for large bidnesses, on the grounds that what huh let’s read the dissent; but then also upheld vaccine mandates for healthcare providers, on the grounds that the goal and purpose of healthcare providers is - wait for it - saving lives.

not a scintilla of hypocrisy there…like, at all

Cascadia wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:46 am Pdub’s anti-vax stance is so transparent

We get it.
You're better than the rest of us.

Getting back to the op, I think we should somehow generally make the burden greater if someone is killed in LEO custody, not lesser.

They’re supposed to protect and serve, not just be a bunch of state-sponsored bullies.

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:51 am

Cascadia wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:46 am Pdub’s anti-vax stance is so transparent

We get it.
You're better than the rest of us.

Us?

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=870&p=240656&hilit=trumpers#p240656

Yes.

But for reals, how long is this temper tantrum going to last?

I agree with the supreme court's ruling on that.
I think it should be mandated in places where people are more vulnerable - this would include, for me, health care establishments and public high schools on down.

That does not apply to most businesses.
But businesses should have the right to mandate it/enforce it how they choose.
The federal government should not step in here.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:54 am Getting back to the op, I think we should somehow generally make the burden greater if someone is killed in LEO custody, not lesser.

They’re supposed to protect and serve, not just be a bunch of state-sponsored bullies.

Fully agree.

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:56 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:54 am Getting back to the op, I think we should somehow generally make the burden greater if someone is killed in LEO custody, not lesser.

They’re supposed to protect and serve, not just be a bunch of state-sponsored bullies.

Fully agree.

Agree.

Now we're getting somewhere.

I think some 80 million Mericans were affected by the big bidness mandate, with another 10 million or so affected by the healthcare worker mandate.

And again, I’m surprised scotus even bothered with the healthcare worker mandate

They could have advanced some logic that the primary goal of healthcare is less about health and more about economic productivity too, and healthcare industry shareholders would rather maintain staffing, than avoid a buncha symptomatic nurses tending to patients.

Besides, how hard can nursing even be? So you brought some MFer a couple advil and took his temperature, even a high school kid could do that!

Take a breather bud, you're flailing.

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:57 am

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:56 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:54 am Getting back to the op, I think we should somehow generally make the burden greater if someone is killed in LEO custody, not lesser.

They’re supposed to protect and serve, not just be a bunch of state-sponsored bullies.

Fully agree.

Agree.

Now we're getting somewhere.

If only we had some passionate and organized movement who might take it to the ballot box, eh?

Now if a state votes to make big businesses have a mandate, I'd likely be in support.

state’s rights lulz

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:05 am

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:57 am

pdub wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:56 am

Fully agree.

Agree.

Now we're getting somewhere.

If only we had some passionate and organized movement who might take it to the ballot box, eh?

Most of us aren't single issue voters.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:07 am state’s rights lulz

Right?

Cascadia wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:08 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:07 am state’s rights lulz

Right?

We get it.
You're better than the rest of us.