It's also a moving target as to where you'll successfully get compliance with the recommendations, whatever they are. I'd imagine there's a sizable group of people who will follow 5-day guidance, but will not follow 10-day guidance.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Tue Dec 28, 2021 12:25 pmThe shorter incubation time is based largely on early data from group gatherings. And it appears the incubation time is shorter both for time until contagious and time until symptomatic. But in both cases you're thought to be most contagious two days prior to developing symptoms. (But both things happen a couple days sooner)ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Dec 28, 2021 12:16 pmWhat’s the data on contagious period after exposure or infection?
The radio said they found it was most contagious from like 2-5 days after symptoms (or was it exposure?), then got kinda vague like “and after 5 days it isn’t THAT contagious”
So what the science behind the 10 days suddenly now 5? Is there even science behind it, or did the CDC just give in to “the economy” or whatever, and slice that quarantine in half like it’s just another break room donut?
I believe the change in isolation time has more to do with reduced severity than with becoming less contagious more quickly.
So, if the research suggests that the risks of letting people out after five days are not significant, then the adoption benefits may well overwhelm the risk.