What I mean is, if you wanted to fuck the Dems, you'd do this with obviously pro-Harris messaging. Get HARRIS voters to think they registered to vote (only to learn, too late, that it was a grift).KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 4:42 pmmaybe?jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 4:39 pmI mean, of course that's not ok.KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 4:37 pm not ok
Elon Musk’s new super PAC is collecting scores of voters’ personal information under the guise of inviting them to register to vote, as part of his effort to boost Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
Earlier this month, Musk denied reports that he would be donating $45 million a month to Trump’s campaign during an interview with right-wing commentator Jordan Peterson. Instead, the technocrat clarified that he had created a new super PAC, called the America PAC.
Musk’s America PAC is a door-to-door canvassing operation, which allows it to work in direct coordination with the Trump campaign, according to an FEC advisory from earlier this year. This allows Musk, and his fellow Silicon Valley donors, to stick their hands—and their cash—right into the presidential race on Trump’s behalf.
How exactly they plan to do this is even more disturbing.
The America PAC has launched a series of digital ads using the image of Trump’s assassination, to invite people browsing Google to “register to vote,” CNBC reported Friday. In states where the outcome is certain, such as California, the ads actually do direct them to a voter registration site.
But in key battleground states, users are directed to a very different page, which prompts them to enter their phone number, address, and age. Once complete, users are then greeted by a “Thank You” page, with no actual link to voter registration in sight.
Musk’s America PAC has poured $800,000 into digital advertisements to target voters in the key battleground states of Arizona, Michigan, Georgia, North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, according to AdImpact. The information collected from user responses to this ad campaign will inform the PAC’s canvassing efforts in those states...
(New Republic)
But that said - this particular grift would seem to skew unfavorable to Trump, right?
if those in swing states catch on
or, do you mean to suggest that more unregistered non-trump voters would be prompted to register in the non-swing states?
Evil Rich People
Re: Evil Rich People
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13617
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Evil Rich People
ah, i got youjfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 4:59 pmWhat I mean is, if you wanted to fuck the Dems, you'd do this with obviously pro-Harris messaging. Get HARRIS voters to think they registered to vote (only to learn, too late, that it was a grift).KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 4:42 pmmaybe?
if those in swing states catch on
or, do you mean to suggest that more unregistered non-trump voters would be prompted to register in the non-swing states?
i guess it depends then on what musk and his peeps end up doing with the swing state data. i would presume they plan for more intensive follow-ups to those deemed “worthy”
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13617
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Evil Rich People
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Evil Rich People
From Seeking Alpha:
Elon Musk's $13B Twitter buyout is worst deal for banks since financial crisis - report
Elon Musk's $44B acquisition of Twitter has become the worst merger-finance deal for banks since the 2008-'09 financial crisis, according to a media report.
A group of seven banks, including Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS), lent $13B to Musk to take Twitter private in October 2022. Usually, banks quickly sell such loans to get them off their balance sheets, generating money from fees in the process.
But Twitter, now named X, soon saw its financial performance falter. As a result, the banks that financed the deal were unable to sell the debt without racking up big losses. In industry jargon, the debt has become "hung."
The Wall Street Journal, citing data from PitchBook LCD, said the Twitter loans have been hung longer than every similar unsold deal for which the research firm had complete records since the financial crisis. While there were many more hung deals during the financial crisis, most were either sold or written off within about a year after the loans were issued, the newspaper said.
A professor of finance at the University of Chicago goes as far as to say that Twitter is the biggest hung deal by dollar amount of all time. "The loans have weighed on the banks for much longer than other hung deals we’ve seen," Steven Kaplan told the WSJ.
Other banks involved in the Twitter financing are Barclays (NYSE:BCS), Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (NYSE:MUFG), BNP Paribas (OTCQX:BNPQF) (OTCQX:BNPQY), Mizuho (NYSE:MFG), and Société Générale (OTCPK:SCGLF) (OTCPK:SCGLY).
X has been paying the interest on the loans, which are hefty because below investment-grade debt has wider rate spreads than investment-grade, the article said. The banks could still be made whole if X can cover its interest obligations and repay the principal when the loans mature. Such loans generally are for seven to eight years.
Elon Musk's $13B Twitter buyout is worst deal for banks since financial crisis - report
Elon Musk's $44B acquisition of Twitter has become the worst merger-finance deal for banks since the 2008-'09 financial crisis, according to a media report.
A group of seven banks, including Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS), lent $13B to Musk to take Twitter private in October 2022. Usually, banks quickly sell such loans to get them off their balance sheets, generating money from fees in the process.
But Twitter, now named X, soon saw its financial performance falter. As a result, the banks that financed the deal were unable to sell the debt without racking up big losses. In industry jargon, the debt has become "hung."
The Wall Street Journal, citing data from PitchBook LCD, said the Twitter loans have been hung longer than every similar unsold deal for which the research firm had complete records since the financial crisis. While there were many more hung deals during the financial crisis, most were either sold or written off within about a year after the loans were issued, the newspaper said.
A professor of finance at the University of Chicago goes as far as to say that Twitter is the biggest hung deal by dollar amount of all time. "The loans have weighed on the banks for much longer than other hung deals we’ve seen," Steven Kaplan told the WSJ.
Other banks involved in the Twitter financing are Barclays (NYSE:BCS), Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (NYSE:MUFG), BNP Paribas (OTCQX:BNPQF) (OTCQX:BNPQY), Mizuho (NYSE:MFG), and Société Générale (OTCPK:SCGLF) (OTCPK:SCGLY).
X has been paying the interest on the loans, which are hefty because below investment-grade debt has wider rate spreads than investment-grade, the article said. The banks could still be made whole if X can cover its interest obligations and repay the principal when the loans mature. Such loans generally are for seven to eight years.
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Derek Cressman
Re: Evil Rich People
Evil Rich People have bought and paid for enough SCOTUS justices to buy enough politicians to rig the tax system. Americans deserve better, vote for Democrats.
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Derek Cressman
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13617
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Evil Rich People
i’m gonna have to pay capital gains taxes next year
it’s shitty
it’s shitty
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
-
- Posts: 4850
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:35 pm
Re: Evil Rich People
They've got to adjust this somehow. Not necessarily taxing the unrealized gains, but something that limits their ability to essentially use them as currency. They shouldn't be allowed to use them as currency, trading between individuals to purchase goods or serviceds without being taxed in my opinion. That should trigger a taxable event.
Re: Evil Rich People
I don't have an issue with Biden's plan, which Harris is adopting, to tax unrealized capital gains (on liquid securities) for people with net worths of greater than $100,000,000.00.
There are 11,000 of those in the US, and the tax specifically would not be levied against illiquid securities (in other (and somewhat-oversimplifying) words, a startup founder would not be taxed on her stock that does not have a public market, even if that stock is worth a billion dollars).
What's more, I would guess that nearly every person in that 11,000 will be paying estimated taxes already anyway - and that's what these taxes would be, in effect.
In short, I view this plan as something with functional (deficit reduction) and policy (the ultra-rich bear the burden in measures to reduce wealth inequality) benefits that well exceed the detriments.
I do not for one second believe that this is a slippery slope to taxing even ordinary rich people's retirements, and nor do I for one second believe that this will discourage investment.
There are 11,000 of those in the US, and the tax specifically would not be levied against illiquid securities (in other (and somewhat-oversimplifying) words, a startup founder would not be taxed on her stock that does not have a public market, even if that stock is worth a billion dollars).
What's more, I would guess that nearly every person in that 11,000 will be paying estimated taxes already anyway - and that's what these taxes would be, in effect.
In short, I view this plan as something with functional (deficit reduction) and policy (the ultra-rich bear the burden in measures to reduce wealth inequality) benefits that well exceed the detriments.
I do not for one second believe that this is a slippery slope to taxing even ordinary rich people's retirements, and nor do I for one second believe that this will discourage investment.
Re: Evil Rich People
I've repeated: "If I'm paying taxes, that means I must be making money", so many times in my head for so many years, I've pretty much managed to convince myself it's a good problem to have. Because, it is. Taxes are immutable, anyway. I can't let immutables ruin my life.KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 8:43 am i’m gonna have to pay capital gains taxes next year
it’s shitty
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Derek Cressman
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13617
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Evil Rich People
yes…i know, i knowShirley wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 2:47 pmI've repeated: "If I'm paying taxes, that means I must be making money", so many times in my head for so many years, I've pretty much managed to convince myself it's a good problem to have. Because, it is. Taxes are immutable, anyway. I can't let immutables ruin my life.KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 8:43 am i’m gonna have to pay capital gains taxes next year
it’s shitty
it just feels different, having to plan to just hand thousands (if not tens of thousands) of dollars over to the IRS. i’m fortunate enough that i’ve never had massive tax bills; i’ve probably gotten a refund 90% of the time. and, i’m generally of the belief that it’s going to a worthy cause. i’m really just bitching to bitch
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 6020
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: Evil Rich People
I look forward to the year where I DON'T have to pay Capital Gains Texas.
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
Re: Evil Rich People
Be sure to wake me up when that happens.Overlander wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 3:32 pm I look forward to the year where I DON'T have to pay Capital Gains Texas.
“The Electoral College is DEI for rural white folks.”
Derek Cressman
Derek Cressman
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12257
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: Evil Rich People
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: Evil Rich People
I think all of the plastic surgery has damaged Cuban’s brain.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 6:21 pm Cuban asks Musk a good question.
https://twitter.com/mcuban/status/1830283465964859404
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12257
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: Evil Rich People
How much plastic surgery have you had?JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 9:13 pmI think all of the plastic surgery has damaged Cuban’s brain.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 6:21 pm Cuban asks Musk a good question.
https://twitter.com/mcuban/status/1830283465964859404
Help me out, why would/did you criticize Cuban for that post?
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
Re: Evil Rich People
None.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 6:15 amHow much plastic surgery have you had?JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 9:13 pmI think all of the plastic surgery has damaged Cuban’s brain.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 6:21 pm Cuban asks Musk a good question.
https://twitter.com/mcuban/status/1830283465964859404
Help me out, why would/did you criticize Cuban for that post?
I find him tiresome, combative, and self-righteous. Musk has the right to do with his money as he sees fit, just like anyone else. If Cuban doesn’t like the way X is being run, he can either buy it himself or create his own platform.
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13617
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Evil Rich People
oh, the irony
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Evil Rich People
You forgot the “fucktard.”
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13617
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Evil Rich People
you’re the one doing the talking
giggle
giggle
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Evil Rich People
I’m just saying, if I had your next-level rapier wit, I wouldn’t want to miss any opportunity to put it on display.
“I wouldn’t sleep with your wife because she would fall in love and your black little heart would be crushed again. And 100% I could beat your ass.” - Overlander