Kansas Crimson

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 6:50 pm He's not fat, he's 70s big.

^^^^

I read Laurenson's thread on Twitter last night.

WTAF?

Anybody know what that protestor was shouting as police escorted him out of the hearing?

ousdahl wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:12 am Anybody know what that protestor was shouting as police escorted him out of the hearing?

He was merely pointing out that none of the democrats has thought for a second to reflect on why it was perfectly normal, i.e., perfect, for Trump to enlist the help of Putin in 2016 and Zelensky in 2020, to help him win the election.

Feral wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 10:11 am

If only one of Trump's personal attorneys, Rudy or William Barr, were presenting the minority's case to the Judiciary Committee.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2019 3:33 pm I read Laurenson's thread on Twitter last night.

WTAF?

Follow it up with some articles on the Panama Papers and top it off by researching Trump.org's questionable cash sales of properties to nefarious folks for decades and it's pretty mind boggling.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:12 am Anybody know what that protestor was shouting as police escorted him out of the hearing?

He was proclaiming Trumps innocence mainly. I noticed Adler's smirk as the protester was escorted out.
smh, very entertaining.

I listened for a couple of minutes while getting lunch. Little kids throwing caturds at each other in the sandbox.

dolomite wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 11:30 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:12 am Anybody know what that protestor was shouting as police escorted him out of the hearing?

He was proclaiming Trumps innocence mainly. I noticed Adler's smirk as the protester was escorted out.
smh, very entertaining.

Hey! look what the cat barfed up!

Everyone knew there were people like Trump amongst us, we just never imagined that the republican party was so devoid of principles that they would ardently enable them.

AG Barr and Durham instantly leaping to Trump's defense and bastardizing our DOJ into a public relations arm of the Trump Administration immediately after the IG report, which reveals all their "spying" and "witch hunt" conspiracy propaganda bullshit was nothing but lies.

smfh.

What's the over/under that Trump will fire the FBI Director today? After all, Lavrov's coming to town:

Because, wtaf!?

Is it just me, or is it reasonable to assume that "tough on communism" republicans would be apoplectic, if Obama or another democrat were doing something like this?



President Trump told two senior Russian officials in a 2017 Oval Office meeting that he was unconcerned about Moscow’s interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election because the United States did the same in other countries, an assertion that prompted alarmed White House officials to limit access to the remarks to an unusually small number of people, according to three former officials with knowledge of the matter.

The comments, which have not been previously reported, were part of a now-infamous meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, in which Trump revealed highly classified information that exposed a source of intelligence on the Islamic State. He also said during the meeting that firing FBI Director James B. Comey the previous day had relieved “great pressure” on him...[/url]

Lavrov is coming to town for the same reason he met with Trump earlier: Putin wants to know if Trump is as genuinely unhinged as he seems like from his recent discussions about light bulbs and toilets might indicate.

Speaking of "republican enablers":

Do I lulz?

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... peachment/

Or do I lulz?

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/1 ... ent-080311

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:30 pm Do I lulz?

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... peachment/

Or do I lulz?

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/1 ... ent-080311

It would be unreasonable to think that everyone would be on the exact same page and it would be absurd for all involved to not float out there all possible options to discuss the merits. This is a very serious matter and honestly, I would be disappointed if all options weren't discussed.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:30 pm Do I lulz?

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... peachment/

Or do I lulz?

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/1 ... ent-080311

Laughing at the only impediment to Trump being even more lawless?

Of course, makes sense.