They are like Cicadas that spring to life when there are no predators
March Madness 23
Re: March Madness 23
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Re: March Madness 23
uconn is more champions classic worthy than msu.
uconn is like villanova. they are not a blueblood. but their recent history says they are an elite basketball program. uconn is above villanova.
uconn is like villanova. they are not a blueblood. but their recent history says they are an elite basketball program. uconn is above villanova.
Re: March Madness 23
and yes. the only bluebloods in 2023 are KANSAS, unc, duke and kent.
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Their recent titles feel like good fortune. But they were dominant this year
And back in the day it felt like they had a really good team with Emeka okafor/ben gordon
And didn't the rip Hamilton squad upset a really dominant Duke team with Elton brand
And back in the day it felt like they had a really good team with Emeka okafor/ben gordon
And didn't the rip Hamilton squad upset a really dominant Duke team with Elton brand
Re: March Madness 23
Probably right but it's tough to say UConn is above Nova when UConn is only 7 years removed from back to back to back loosing seasons.
Take a look at 17, 18 and 19.
16 they just got in as a 9 seed and then got blown out by Perry Ellis.
Not so good.
Can you imagine 3 loosing seasons in a row at Kansas, Kentucky, UNC or Duke?
Take a look at 17, 18 and 19.
16 they just got in as a 9 seed and then got blown out by Perry Ellis.
Not so good.
Can you imagine 3 loosing seasons in a row at Kansas, Kentucky, UNC or Duke?
Re: March Madness 23
were gonna blame that on the aac.
Re: March Madness 23
i mean, dominant in the tourney, sure. they lost in the bigE semis, and 4th place in their conference, so not exactly a dominant team.randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:15 am Their recent titles feel like good fortune. But they were dominant this year
- Back2Lawrence
- Posts: 3151
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Of course. Fish made statement its a stretch being a blue blood only having one title in fifty years. My comment simply a response to that. It’s just math based on what he said.randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:01 amEver heard of Danny manningBack2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:56 amSo, KU was out of the blue blood club from 2002-2008.
Y’all are funny.
- Back2Lawrence
- Posts: 3151
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm
Re: March Madness 23
For the record, I’d we weee voting, I wouldn’t put UConn in Blue Blood category. And of course KU is.
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Ku won a title in 1988 thoBack2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 11:08 amOf course. Fish made statement its a stretch being a blue blood only having one title in fifty years. My comment simply a response to that. It’s just math based on what he said.randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:01 amEver heard of Danny manningBack2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:56 am
So, KU was out of the blue blood club from 2002-2008.
Y’all are funny.
Re: March Madness 23
In 2002 we were 50 years removed from 1952 so we only had the 1988 title.
However in 2002 and 2003 we went back to back Final Fours with a champ appearance.
However in 2002 and 2003 we went back to back Final Fours with a champ appearance.
- Back2Lawrence
- Posts: 3151
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Wrong banner for the argument made (not by me).
More reason to dislike McNamara!
I’d rather be a KU fan than any other. UNC would be ok, for the most part, too, although having lived out east for a while, ewww.
Re: March Madness 23
I think our grasp on a spot was tenuous for a while. Easy to forget now, but Bill being Bill was like a 99.994th percentile outcome. We very very very very easily could have gone down the UCLA/Indiana road.Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:56 amSo, KU was out of the blue blood club from 2002-2008.
- NewtonHawk11
- Posts: 12826
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: March Madness 23
And still very well could once Bill decides to be done. Much like UNC is trending downward at the moment, Duke is unsure of future status and success as well.jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 11:41 amI think our grasp on a spot was tenuous for a while. Easy to forget now, but Bill being Bill was like a 99.994th percentile outcome. We very very very very easily could have gone down the UCLA/Indiana road.Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:56 amSo, KU was out of the blue blood club from 2002-2008.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
Re: March Madness 23
Absolutely. But Bill gave us a lot of breathing room (really, our Indiana period was pre-Brown).NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 11:43 amAnd still very well could once Bill decides to be done. Much like UNC is trending downward at the moment, Duke is unsure of future status and success as well.jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 11:41 amI think our grasp on a spot was tenuous for a while. Easy to forget now, but Bill being Bill was like a 99.994th percentile outcome. We very very very very easily could have gone down the UCLA/Indiana road.Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:56 am
So, KU was out of the blue blood club from 2002-2008.
- Back2Lawrence
- Posts: 3151
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm
Re: March Madness 23
I’m in the group that thinks it will be easier in a couple years for the ‘established’ schools (lol, schools). With The portal and such. Right now we are still washing out 23rd year seniors and such. When those go away, talent going to be stacked more again, IMO.
Re: March Madness 23
It'll take a while to see how everything shakes out.Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 11:46 am I’m in the group that thinks it will be easier in a couple years for the ‘established’ schools (lol, schools). With The portal and such. Right now we are still washing out 23rd year seniors and such. When those go away, talent going to be stacked more again, IMO.
I think you could make a solid argument that NIL will be democratizing for talent, especially in basketball (where 2-3 guys on a roster can make an enormous difference).
I think you could also make a solid argument that NIL (plus the free transfer) will devastate smaller programs, because as soon as KU (for example) sees that a kid was overlooked and can play at this level, KU can run out and poach.
Re: March Madness 23
But if we're being revisionist, we could also point out if Matt Doherty had won 2 of his veryclose games that he lost at UNC in his final season, he gets into the NCAA tourney, saves his job and returns that stacked crew he recruited of May, McCants and Felton, which is good enough to keep him around longer.
Roi returns Simien, Langford, Miles and brings in Giddens, Padgett and Rodrick Stewart - his kinda dudes - is the 2 seed in St Louis, spits in the river, drinks some cokes - and gets over the hump at Kansas.
Roi returns Simien, Langford, Miles and brings in Giddens, Padgett and Rodrick Stewart - his kinda dudes - is the 2 seed in St Louis, spits in the river, drinks some cokes - and gets over the hump at Kansas.