March Madness 23
- Back2Lawrence
- Posts: 3145
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Doherty was going to be a victim of the good ole boys club, regardless of what he did. (With almost zero chance of any other outcome).
Re: March Madness 23
KANSAS has not made a bad basketball hire in 125 years.
Re: March Madness 23
"Doherty was going to be a victim of the good ole boys club, regardless of what he did. (With almost zero chance of any other outcome)."
I disagree.
UNC was loving their hire that first year.
They just couldn't stand missing the tourney 2 years in a row.
Doherty needed to make the tourney and maybe win the first round -- and then I think he'd have been back with his keeds.
And i'm sure Dean was in roi's ear often after ( and during ) that 2nd year but I don't think he'd ( roi ) have stepped in if Doherty had just gotten back to the tourney.
I disagree.
UNC was loving their hire that first year.
They just couldn't stand missing the tourney 2 years in a row.
Doherty needed to make the tourney and maybe win the first round -- and then I think he'd have been back with his keeds.
And i'm sure Dean was in roi's ear often after ( and during ) that 2nd year but I don't think he'd ( roi ) have stepped in if Doherty had just gotten back to the tourney.
Re: March Madness 23
But there was never fifty years between titles Illy.Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 11:08 amOf course. Fish made statement its a stretch being a blue blood only having one title in fifty years. My comment simply a response to that. It’s just math based on what he said.randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:01 amEver heard of Danny manningBack2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:56 am
So, KU was out of the blue blood club from 2002-2008.
Y’all are funny.
- Back2Lawrence
- Posts: 3145
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Lol. His post says one in 50 years. Weird he understood the jest in my post and doesn’t feel the need to try to force bad math at me, as you are attempting Cunto.
Re: March Madness 23
UCLA won in 1995...which is more or less the same thing as us winning in 1988. It counts...but doesn't do enough to keep you there forever.Back2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 12:42 pm Lol. His post says one in 50 years. Weird he understood the jest in my post and doesn’t feel the need to try to force bad math at me, as you are attempting Cunto.
Re: March Madness 23
Bad math? There was 20 years between 88 and 08. And can the ad hominem. You can contort 1952 and years between championships a lot of ways if you want to denigrate fans and the team, but there were a lot of FFs and conference championships there too. And a math whiz would have defined the extreme as 1973-1988. A fan would say we have never gone more than 36-years without a championship throughout the history of organized basketball. But there was the Wilt triple OT game and Glory Road in there at leastBack2Lawrence wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 12:42 pm Lol. His post says one in 50 years. Weird he understood the jest in my post and doesn’t feel the need to try to force bad math at me, as you are attempting Cunto.
Re: March Madness 23
here....maybe this will help.
the initial statement was UCLA had 1 title in 50 years
1953 to 2003 is 50 years
how many titles did we have between 1953 and 2003?
the initial statement was UCLA had 1 title in 50 years
1953 to 2003 is 50 years
how many titles did we have between 1953 and 2003?
Just Ledoux it
Re: March Madness 23
UConn SDSU least watched NCAA final ever.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12427
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: March Madness 23
9.9 million for the ladies on a Sunday afternoon.
14.7 million for the mens on a Monday evening.
I wonder how many people who knew/know who Caitlin Clark is could name a single player on UConn or SDSU and how many people who knew/know who Adama Sanogo is could name a single player on Iowa or LSU.
Call me crazy (I am) but I seriously believe a standout NCAA female Basketball player is more "marketable" TODAY than a standout NCAA Basketball male player is.
The question is will NCAA women's basketball ever reach the popularity of NCAA men's basketball. Probably not but the 2012 and 2016 USA Olympic women's soccer teams say hello.
14.7 million for the mens on a Monday evening.
I wonder how many people who knew/know who Caitlin Clark is could name a single player on UConn or SDSU and how many people who knew/know who Adama Sanogo is could name a single player on Iowa or LSU.
Call me crazy (I am) but I seriously believe a standout NCAA female Basketball player is more "marketable" TODAY than a standout NCAA Basketball male player is.
The question is will NCAA women's basketball ever reach the popularity of NCAA men's basketball. Probably not but the 2012 and 2016 USA Olympic women's soccer teams say hello.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Lol my goodness. The things I see you post just blow my mind sometimesRainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:00 am 9.9 million for the ladies on a Sunday afternoon.
14.7 million for the mens on a Monday evening.
I wonder how many people who knew/know who Caitlin Clark is could name a single player on UConn or SDSU and how many people who knew/know who Adama Sanogo is could name a single player on Iowa or LSU.
Call me crazy (I am) but I seriously believe a standout NCAA female Basketball player is more "marketable" TODAY than a standout NCAA Basketball male player is.
The question is will NCAA women's basketball ever reach the popularity of NCAA men's basketball. Probably not but the 2012 and 2016 USA Olympic women's soccer teams say hello.
- Back2Lawrence
- Posts: 3145
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Thanks tdub. I think.
And Sparko, no one is denigrating any fan or team. But you seem to have a need for that narrative to play out, so have at it.
Re: March Madness 23
Where’s this year’s UConn fit on all time lists?
20 years from now on the “best teams of the last 20 years” articles, I bet they’re pretty high up, just cuz every tourney win was by like 15+, even tho they weren’t a big deal in the regular season
20 years from now on the “best teams of the last 20 years” articles, I bet they’re pretty high up, just cuz every tourney win was by like 15+, even tho they weren’t a big deal in the regular season
Re: March Madness 23
BWW Chad article.
Re: March Madness 23
The math, if we want to call it that was worse between 1923 and 1988. But those end points don't make sense if you are looking at the continuum. We are damned lucky. There was a huge gulf of years for UCLA before Wooden and the 60s.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12427
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: March Madness 23
Please share with me (and others) what I posted that blew your mind.randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:41 amLol my goodness. The things I see you post just blow my mind sometimesRainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:00 am 9.9 million for the ladies on a Sunday afternoon.
14.7 million for the mens on a Monday evening.
I wonder how many people who knew/know who Caitlin Clark is could name a single player on UConn or SDSU and how many people who knew/know who Adama Sanogo is could name a single player on Iowa or LSU.
Call me crazy (I am) but I seriously believe a standout NCAA female Basketball player is more "marketable" TODAY than a standout NCAA Basketball male player is.
The question is will NCAA women's basketball ever reach the popularity of NCAA men's basketball. Probably not but the 2012 and 2016 USA Olympic women's soccer teams say hello.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Women's basketball reaching the popularity of men's basketball
- randylahey
- Posts: 8970
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: March Madness 23
Thats not sexist either so don't pull that card. The truth of it is men tend to be a lot more interested in men's sports than women are in women sports
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12427
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: March Madness 23
Once again, my exact words - "The question is will NCAA women's basketball ever reach the popularity of NCAA men's basketball. Probably not".randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2023 1:10 pm Women's basketball reaching the popularity of men's basketball
I guess that's mind blowing to you.
I'm sorry? You're welcome? I'm not sure what to say.
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.