Page 64 of 70
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:04 am
by Qusdahl
Yeah, protestors had it coming for sure, and no doubt the cops aren’t just saying that to justify their own brutal power trips.
Hopefully the cops even remembered to turn off their body cams too, so as to avoid the indictments being bothered with any evidence….
…unless the evidence is of protestors throwing daisies, in which case let the body cams roll, cuz JK and Mich and Q would have feared for their lives too.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:21 am
by Mjl
I love how you three are able to just instinctively know for certain which side is lying here
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:22 am
by MICHHAWK
the spring/summer of 2020 reminded me very much of the summer of love in san fran circa 1967.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:36 am
by Qusdahl
Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:21 am
I love how you three are able to just instinctively know for certain which side is lying here
Yea!
As hard as it is to indict ONE cop in this country, let alone 18 of them, you think they’d think to actually weigh the evidence against the cops before indicting
but instead here we are with some rogue BLM prosecutor doing the dirty work for the antifa fascists.
Just for injuring a bunch of protestors who had it coming anyway!
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:46 am
by Cascadia
I wonder how many of the “Anti-Antifa/George Floyd Protest” people actually saw the protests in person.
Or, did they just get worked up watching Fox News reuse they same footage over and over again.
I have a crazy uncle who got all worked up about it and his understanding of what was actually happening in Portland was about as far from the truth as possible.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:49 am
by KUTradition
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:22 am
the spring/summer of 2020 reminded me very much of the summer of love in san fran circa 1967.
interesting
it reminded my 86 year old boss of the fire hoses and dogs that were used against the civil rights protesters of that era
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:02 pm
by Mjl
Qusdahl wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:36 am
Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:21 am
I love how you three are able to just instinctively know for certain which side is lying here
Yea!
As hard as it is to indict ONE cop in this country, let alone 18 of them, you think they’d think to actually weigh the evidence against the cops before indicting
but instead here we are with some rogue BLM prosecutor doing the dirty work for the antifa fascists.
Just for injuring a bunch of protestors who had it coming anyway!
So, guilty until proven innocent? No, wait, just guilty, no chance to show possible evidence of innocence.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:06 pm
by Qusdahl
That’s what I’m sayin! Once again you find yourself on the same side as Q.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:12 pm
by Mjl
Parody requires actually resembling the thing you're parodying. The sad part is I think you think that's what you're doing.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:18 pm
by MICHHAWK
the oushdale has been resembling concussion like symptoms for the last few weeks now. maybe he slipped on the ice and fell on his head.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:20 pm
by Qusdahl
Who?
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:25 pm
by KUTradition
mich is posting like he’s drunk (again)
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:32 pm
by Cascadia
KUTradition wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:25 pm
mich is posting like he’s drunk (again)
Which is normal, what is mjl’s excuse?
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:03 pm
by Mjl
I didn't realize innocent-until-proven-guilty was a wild idea.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:06 pm
by MICHHAWK
Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:03 pm
I didn't realize innocent-until-proven-guilty was a wild idea.
you must be new to this place.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:16 pm
by Qusdahl
Oh puh-lease, those BLM rioters are guilty as sin!
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:23 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:06 pm
Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:03 pm
I didn't realize innocent-until-proven-guilty was a wild idea.
you must be new to this place.
Is this you?
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:55 am
i wonder what the peaceful protesters were hurling at the peace officers to promote a reaction.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:28 pm
by JKLivin
Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:12 pm
Parody requires actually resembling the thing you're parodying. The sad part is I think you think that's what you're doing.
He’s under the impression that he is being really clever. No one else thinks that, but in his mind, he’s on a meta level that the rest of us can’t appreciate.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:34 pm
by MICHHAWK
concussions are not to be fooled with.
Re: Would you be on the Jury?
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:57 pm
by Qusdahl
Clever?
No not really. I’m more so just parroting the same old imperial capitalist propaganda and trite white nationalist bullshit and various other conspiracy theories, thinly disguised as credible right wing talking points. Not much original about it.
How can I be clever if I’m just one click away from getting banned for posting links to literal nazi message boreds?
Wait nm, I wouldn’t get banned for that, now would I.