PhDhawk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:42 pm
The primary goal of any vaccine is to prevent death and serious illness. The covid19 virus causes that. The vaccine prevents it.
You can increase immunity with boosters.
The people with the strongest immunity are those who are fully vaxxed, who then become exposed to the virus.
This is not a good argument against vaccination. People without any immunization are at the highest risk.
In one scenario, unvaxxed, you have no secondary immunity to your first exposure. In the other, vaccinated, you do. It's ALWAYS better to have some level of protection.
You've been wrong since 2020 and still wrong in 2022.
Everything I've posted is supported by the research. I stand by everything I've posted.
You continue to spread bullshit.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:56 pm
by PhDhawk
StayCurious wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:54 pm
Well, this would be partially true if the covid shots were actual vaccines. They are of course mRNA and not a real vaccine. It's now been proven they do nothing at all to protect you or stop spread.
They are vaccines.
They've been shown repeatedly to provide protection. Again and again and again.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:59 pm
by jhawks99
sQuirt knows more about immunology than a PhD in the field.
(S)He knows more about structural engineering than a leader in the field.
Like (s)he says with no sense of irony or self awareness, "It’s Easier To Fool People Than To Convince Them That They’ve Been Fooled"
StayCurious wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:54 pm
Well, this would be partially true if the covid shots were actual vaccines. They are of course mRNA and not a real vaccine. It's now been proven they do nothing at all to protect you or stop spread.
They are vaccines.
They've been shown repeatedly to provide protection. Again and again and again.
Hey PHd, Psych clearly has defeated you.
You obviously do not have the level of expertise that he does on this matter.
Hey Psych, can you give us your professional opinion on how an mRNA based vaccine can’t actually be a vaccine?
I asked my wife, and she said “don’t be stupid. Let us know so I can educate her as well.
StayCurious wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:54 pm
Well, this would be partially true if the covid shots were actual vaccines. They are of course mRNA and not a real vaccine. It's now been proven they do nothing at all to protect you or stop spread.
They are vaccines.
They've been shown repeatedly to provide protection. Again and again and again.
Hey PHd, Psych clearly has defeated you.
You obviously do not have the level of expertise that he does on this matter.
Hey Psych, can you give us your professional opinion on how an mRNA based vaccine can’t actually be a vaccine?
I asked my wife, and she said “don’t be stupid. Let us know so I can educate her as well.
I thought this was psych too, turns out lobster is back.
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 16, 2022 9:42 pm
The primary goal of any vaccine is to prevent death and serious illness. The covid19 virus causes that. The vaccine prevents it.
You can increase immunity with boosters.
The people with the strongest immunity are those who are fully vaxxed, who then become exposed to the virus.
This is not a good argument against vaccination. People without any immunization are at the highest risk.
In one scenario, unvaxxed, you have no secondary immunity to your first exposure. In the other, vaccinated, you do. It's ALWAYS better to have some level of protection.
You've been wrong since 2020 and still wrong in 2022.
I'll give you credit for knowing what year it is. That's one thing you haven't been wrong about on this thread.
I have stopped convincing myself you're a moron - on this site - by accepting you're an asshole - on this site.
Please give yourself a pat on the back for having that influence on me - and I assume some if not many others on this site.
Covid poses almost zero risk to college kids. Young healthy immune systems. If they all got it and passed it around they would be MUCH more resistant to reinfection than if they were all vaccinated and got it and passed it around (since we know vaccines don't prevent transmission)
So what point is there in requiring vaccinations on campuses?
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2022 10:34 am
by StayCurious
It's because the news or phd told them it's safe and effective. They can't evaluate things for themself.
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2022 4:40 pm
by randylahey
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2022 5:08 pm
by StayCurious
Well yeah, that's been pretty obvious since 2020. Simplest explanation is usually the real one.
What's going to come next is the gradual reporting on the vaccine not only being useless but potentially dangerous. England is now starting to discuss the dangers although the US news is still reluctant to because the news if largely funded by Pfizer.
I'm glad this is 2022, a time when this isn't "conspiracy" anymore.
"While evidence suggests there is some level of immunity for those who previously had COVID, it is not known how long you are protected from getting COVID-19 again. Plus, the level of immunity provided by the vaccines after having COVID-19 is higher than the level of immunity for those who had COVID but were not subsequently vaccinated."
Natural immunity + vaccination immunity is the best protection.
Throwback to when they wanted to cancel joe Rogan for being right
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 11:26 am
by KUTradition
i’m guessing tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber don’t think evolution happens either
Re: COVID-19 - On the Ground
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2022 11:26 am
by StayCurious
BIg pharma no likely someone getting in the way of their money. How many times have you heard a news channel say "brought to you by Pfizer"? Follow the money.
