Kansas Crimson

Instead of being negative about Trump,maybe we should give him a chance to see how he and his cabinet can advance our country.

You're right Dolo. Let's focus on invading Greenland and Panama.

dolomite wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 12:35 pm Instead of being negative about Trump,maybe we should give him a chance to see how he and his cabinet can advance our country.

Agreed.
But, what happens when he says or does something completely ignorant and counter productive tomorrow?

I don't see myself pretending like Trump is normalcy. I amazed at those who can.

dolomite wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 12:35 pm Instead of being negative about Trump,maybe we should give him a chance to see how he and his cabinet can advance our country.

have you SEEN his cabinet?

dolomite wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 12:35 pm Instead of being negative about Trump,maybe we should give him a chance to see how he and his cabinet can advance our country.

This is basically DEI for MAGA. "Let's not hire the most competent, qualified candidates. Let's hire incompetent, unqualified rubes because we agree with their politics and sit back with our fingers crossed and pray".

Electoral College is DEI for MAGA. The Senate is DEI for MAGA.

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:40 pm

dolomite wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 12:35 pm Instead of being negative about Trump,maybe we should give him a chance to see how he and his cabinet can advance our country.

This is basically DEI for MAGA. "Let's not hire the most competent, qualified candidates. Let's hire incompetent, unqualified rubes because we agree with their politics and sit back with our fingers crossed and pray".

Um, did you see or hear Giggles? Incompetent and unqualified are the nicest adjectives one could use in reference to her.

JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:47 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:40 pm

dolomite wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 12:35 pm Instead of being negative about Trump,maybe we should give him a chance to see how he and his cabinet can advance our country.

This is basically DEI for MAGA. "Let's not hire the most competent, qualified candidates. Let's hire incompetent, unqualified rubes because we agree with their politics and sit back with our fingers crossed and pray".

Um, did you see or hear Giggles? Incompetent and unqualified are the nicest adjectives one could use in reference to her.

you’re obsessed and broken

KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 8:47 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:47 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:40 pm

This is basically DEI for MAGA. "Let's not hire the most competent, qualified candidates. Let's hire incompetent, unqualified rubes because we agree with their politics and sit back with our fingers crossed and pray".

Um, did you see or hear Giggles? Incompetent and unqualified are the nicest adjectives one could use in reference to her.

you’re obsessed and broken

Accomplished and powerful women make Psychs pussy hurt

Overlander wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:59 pm

KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 8:47 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:47 pm

Um, did you see or hear Giggles? Incompetent and unqualified are the nicest adjectives one could use in reference to her.

you’re obsessed and broken

Accomplished and powerful women make Psychs pussy hurt

Good one, bruh. You’re killing it - in life and in comedy.

Overlander wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:59 pm

KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 8:47 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:47 pm

Um, did you see or hear Giggles? Incompetent and unqualified are the nicest adjectives one could use in reference to her.

you’re obsessed and broken

Accomplished and powerful women make Psychs pussy hurt

Absolutely she's "accomplished and powerful", and I agree women who are probably make "Psych's pussy hurt", but..... Let's be honest, she was pretty much ASS as a Presidential Candidate, and I felt has/had close to zero "likability", and did have multiple significant flaws.
That's being said by someone (me) who fully admits I was ignorant and fooled 4+ years ago when she was running as VP, because I shamefully admit I was SOMEWHAT "enamored" with her.
The fact that I typically lean left when voting, and had an extremely difficult time deciding who to vote for when Donald Trump was one of my choices, sort of speaks volumes about how I felt/feel about her.

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 6:48 am

Overlander wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:59 pm

KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 8:47 pm
you’re obsessed and broken

Accomplished and powerful women make Psychs pussy hurt

Absolutely she's "accomplished and powerful", and I agree women who are probably make "Psych's pussy hurt", but..... Let's be honest, she was pretty much ASS as a Presidential Candidate, and I felt has/had close to zero "likability", and did have multiple significant flaws.
That's being said by someone (me) who fully admits I was ignorant and fooled 4+ years ago when she was running as VP, because I shamefully admit I was SOMEWHAT "enamored" with her.
The fact that I typically lean left when voting, and had an extremely difficult time deciding who to vote for when Donald Trump was one of my choices, sort of speaks volumes about how I felt/feel about her.

It "speaks volumes about" something.

JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:47 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:40 pm

dolomite wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 12:35 pm Instead of being negative about Trump,maybe we should give him a chance to see how he and his cabinet can advance our country.

This is basically DEI for MAGA. "Let's not hire the most competent, qualified candidates. Let's hire incompetent, unqualified rubes because we agree with their politics and sit back with our fingers crossed and pray".

Um, did you see or hear Giggles? Incompetent and unqualified are the nicest adjectives one could use in reference to her.

The only thing Republicans lie about more than what they are going to do is what Dems have done.

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:32 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:47 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:40 pm

This is basically DEI for MAGA. "Let's not hire the most competent, qualified candidates. Let's hire incompetent, unqualified rubes because we agree with their politics and sit back with our fingers crossed and pray".

Um, did you see or hear Giggles? Incompetent and unqualified are the nicest adjectives one could use in reference to her.

The only thing Republicans lie about more than what they are going to do is what Dems have done.

So, in your mind, Trump is an incompetent buffoon, and Giggles sounds like a Rhodes Scholar. Got it.

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 6:48 am

Overlander wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:59 pm

KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 8:47 pm
you’re obsessed and broken

Accomplished and powerful women make Psychs pussy hurt

Absolutely she's "accomplished and powerful", and I agree women who are probably make "Psych's pussy hurt", but..... Let's be honest, she was pretty much ASS as a Presidential Candidate, and I felt has/had close to zero "likability", and did have multiple significant flaws.
That's being said by someone (me) who fully admits I was ignorant and fooled 4+ years ago when she was running as VP, because I shamefully admit I was SOMEWHAT "enamored" with her.
The fact that I typically lean left when voting, and had an extremely difficult time deciding who to vote for when Donald Trump was one of my choices, sort of speaks volumes about how I felt/feel about her.

I have no problem admitting when people are accomplished and powerful. I can't stand Hillary Clinton as a person, but the whole Giggles debacle made me appreciate that she is at least intelligent and accomplished, albeit a very unpleasant individual.

Giggles, on the other hand, as you so eloquently put it, was "pretty much ASS" as a candidate, was unlikeable, and inspired zero confidence. And, yet, somehow it is the voter's fault that they held their nose and voted for the lesser of the evils.

Given a choice between Trump and Tulsi Gabbard, I wouldn't even have had to think about it. But your party had to prop up the DEI candidate and then double down when it became obvious that she was not up to the task. That's on you, not me.

JKLivin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:47 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:32 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:47 pm

Um, did you see or hear Giggles? Incompetent and unqualified are the nicest adjectives one could use in reference to her.

The only thing Republicans lie about more than what they are going to do is what Dems have done.

So, in your mind, Trump is an incompetent buffoon, and Giggles sounds like a Rhodes Scholar. Got it.

You do not need to be a Rhodes Scholar to be President but you need to be more competent than Trump has proven to be and Harris has proven to be both more competent and more qualified than Trump by far.

queue the snide, dishonest giggles comment in 3…2…1…

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:55 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:47 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:32 am

The only thing Republicans lie about more than what they are going to do is what Dems have done.

So, in your mind, Trump is an incompetent buffoon, and Giggles sounds like a Rhodes Scholar. Got it.

Harris has proven to be both more competent and more qualified than Trump by far.

And, with that statement, you have proven yourself either ignorant or delusional. Ridiculous.

KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:59 am queue the snide, dishonest giggles comment in 3…2…1…

The opinions of fools who support fools as to who is a fool and who isn't matter little to me.

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:14 am

KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:59 am queue the snide, dishonest giggles comment in 3…2…1…

The opinions of fools who support fools as to who is a fool and who isn't matter little to me.

Could not agree more. Glad we are in agreement, albeit not as to who the fools are in this scenario.